Cloud printing without VPN or drivers: print from anywhere to any printer through a printer URL, and get documents signed electronically on the way.
sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Which is more popular?
Based on our record, pghoard
seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned
2 times
since March 2021.
social mentions
0 vs 2
WordPress popularity
100% vs 0%
Base details
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
Multi-cloud object storage support pghoard supports backing up to multiple cloud storage providers including AWS S3, Google Cloud Storage, Azure Blob Storage, Swift, and local filesystem, giving flexibility in choosing or switching backup destinations.
Streaming WAL archiving and compression It supports continuous WAL streaming and archiving with built-in compression (using algorithms like Snappy, LZMA, or zstd) and encryption, reducing storage costs and improving backup transfer efficiency.
Point-in-time recovery (PITR) pghoard enables point-in-time recovery by combining base backups with WAL segments, allowing restoration of a PostgreSQL database to any specific moment, which is critical for disaster recovery scenarios.
Open source and actively maintained by Aiven Being maintained by Aiven, a company specializing in managed database services, pghoard benefits from real-world production use, ongoing updates, and community contributions, ensuring reliability and continued support.
REST API and monitoring integration It provides a REST API for managing and monitoring backup operations, and can integrate with monitoring systems, making it easier to automate backup workflows and track backup health in production environments.
Possible disadvantages
PostgreSQL-specific tool pghoard is designed exclusively for PostgreSQL, so organizations using multiple database systems would need separate backup solutions for other databases, increasing operational complexity.
Complex initial setup and configuration Setting up pghoard requires careful configuration of cloud storage credentials, encryption keys, and WAL-G-like settings, which can be complex for users unfamiliar with PostgreSQL internals or cloud storage APIs.
Limited GUI or dashboard pghoard primarily operates via command-line and configuration files with a basic REST API, lacking a polished web-based dashboard for easier visualization and management compared to some commercial backup solutions.
Documentation gaps for edge cases While basic documentation exists, users have reported that some advanced use cases, troubleshooting steps, and edge-case scenarios are not thoroughly documented, requiring deeper investigation into the source code.
Smaller community compared to alternatives Compared to more widely adopted tools like pgBackRest or Barman, pghoard has a smaller user community and fewer third-party resources, tutorials, or plugins, which may limit support options for troubleshooting.
Analysis
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.
Diffeepghoard
No analysis of Diffee yet.
Overall verdict
pghoard is a solid, mature open-source backup and restore solution for PostgreSQL, developed by Aiven and used in production for managing cloud-based PostgreSQL backups. It's well-suited for teams needing reliable, automated backup management with cloud storage integration, though it requires some setup and PostgreSQL administration knowledge to use effectively.
Why this product is good
Supports multiple cloud storage backends including AWS S3, Google Cloud Storage, and Azure Blob Storage
Provides continuous WAL archiving and base backups for point-in-time recovery
Battle-tested in production by Aiven for their managed PostgreSQL service
Open source with an active development history and community support
Handles backup compression and encryption out of the box
Supports multiple PostgreSQL versions and can manage backups for multiple clusters
Written in Python, making it relatively easy to extend or customize
Recommended for
Organizations running self-hosted PostgreSQL databases who need robust backup solutions
DevOps teams looking for cloud-native backup tooling with multi-provider storage support
Companies requiring point-in-time recovery capabilities for compliance or disaster recovery
Users already familiar with Aiven's ecosystem or seeking battle-tested tools from a managed database provider
Teams needing to manage backups across multiple PostgreSQL instances or clusters
Users comfortable with Python-based tooling and command-line configuration
Share your experience with using Diffee and pghoard.
For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Social recommendations and mentions
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.
Diffee0 mentionspghoard2 mentions
Tracking Diffee since Mar 2021.
Pgbackrest is no longer being maintained
The "closest" would be using Barman with hook scripts (https://docs.pgbarman.org/release/3.18.0/user_guide/hook_scripts.html#hook-scripts-using-barman-cloud-scripts-as-hooks-in-barman) if you rely on cloud storage for storing backups....
- Source: Hacker News
/
6 months ago
Future PostgreSQL: improvement to the replication protocol
This story starts with our own PgHoard, a PITR backup tool for PostgreSQL. PgHoard offers several methods to archive the WAL (Write Ahead Log), including pg_receivewal, a small application shipping with PostgreSQL which connects to a...
- Source: dev.to
/
almost 5 years ago
