Software Alternatives & Startups

Dgraph VS PostgreSQL

Compare Dgraph VS PostgreSQL and see what are their differences

Dgraph

A fast, distributed graph database with ACID transactions.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is a powerful, open source object-relational database system.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source

Which is more popular?

Dgraph might be a bit more popular than PostgreSQL. We know about 21 links to it since March 2021 and only 19 links to PostgreSQL.

social mentions
21 vs 19
Graph Databases popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
62 vs 239

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Dgraph
PostgreSQL
Website docs.dgraph.io postgresql.org
Pricing
Open source Official pricing
Open source Official pricing
Company — Startup from the United States
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Dgraph 5 features
PostgreSQL 7 features
  • High Performance
    Dgraph is optimized for high-throughput and low-latency scenarios, making it suitable for real-time applications with large datasets.
  • Horizontal Scalability
    Dgraph offers seamless horizontal scalability, allowing the system to expand across multiple nodes to handle increased workloads.
  • GraphQL Compatibility
    Dgraph provides native support for GraphQL, allowing developers to use a widely accepted query language with their graph database.
  • Distributed Architecture
    Being a distributed graph database, Dgraph ensures data replication and high availability across different geographical locations.
  • Strong Consistency
    Dgraph offers strong consistency guarantees, ensuring that all nodes see the same data at the same time, which is crucial for many applications.

Possible disadvantages

  • Complex Setup
    Setting up and managing Dgraph can be complex, especially for users not familiar with distributed systems.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running Dgraph in a production environment can be resource-intensive, requiring significant computational resources and memory.
  • Learning Curve
    For developers new to graph databases, there may be a steep learning curve compared to more traditional relational databases.
  • Limited Tooling Ecosystem
    Compared to some older graph databases, Dgraph's ecosystem, in terms of third-party tools and integrations, is not as mature.
  • Community Support
    As a relatively newer entrant in the database market, Dgraph may have less community-driven support compared to more established databases.
  • Open Source
    PostgreSQL is an open-source database management system, which means it is free to use, modify, and distribute. This reduces the cost of database management for individuals and organizations.
  • ACID Compliance
    PostgreSQL is fully ACID (Atomicity, Consistency, Isolation, Durability) compliant, ensuring reliable transactions and data integrity.
  • Extensible
    PostgreSQL is highly extensible, allowing users to add custom functions, data types, and operators. This enables tailored solutions to specific requirements.
  • Advanced SQL Features
    PostgreSQL supports advanced SQL features like full-text search, JSON and XML data types, and complex queries, providing powerful tools for database operations.
  • Community Support
    There is a strong and active community around PostgreSQL, offering extensive documentation, forums, and collaborative support, which aids troubleshooting and development.
  • Multiple Indexing Techniques
    PostgreSQL offers a variety of indexing techniques such as B-tree, GIN, GiST, and BRIN, allowing for optimized query performance on various data types.
  • Cross-Platform Availability
    PostgreSQL runs on all major operating systems (Windows, MacOS, Linux, Unix), giving flexibility in deployment and development environments.

Possible disadvantages

  • Complex Configuration
    Setting up and configuring PostgreSQL can be complex and time-consuming, especially for beginners, requiring a good understanding of its parameters and best practices.
  • Heavy Resource Consumption
    PostgreSQL can be resource-intensive, consuming significant CPU and memory compared to other database systems, which may affect performance on lower-end hardware.
  • Backup and Restore Process
    The backup and restore process in PostgreSQL is not as straightforward as in some other database systems, requiring more manual intervention and understanding of tools like pg_dump and pg_restore.
  • Replication Complexity
    While PostgreSQL supports replication, setting it up can be more complex than some other databases. Advanced configurations like multi-master replication can be particularly challenging.
  • Steeper Learning Curve
    Due to its advanced features and extensive capabilities, PostgreSQL can have a steeper learning curve, making it harder for new users to get started compared to simpler database systems.
  • Less Third-Party Tool Support
    PostgreSQL has less support from third-party tools compared to more widely adopted databases like MySQL, which can limit options for auxiliary functions like administration, monitoring, and development.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Dgraph
PostgreSQL

No analysis of Dgraph yet.

Overall verdict

  • Yes, PostgreSQL is considered a high-quality and reliable database management system, suitable for a wide range of applications, from small-scale personal projects to large enterprise systems.

Why this product is good

  • PostgreSQL is known for its strong support of SQL standards and excellent documentation, making it reliable for complex database requirements.
  • It provides advanced features such as multi-version concurrency control (MVCC), point-in-time recovery, and support for advanced indexing techniques.
  • PostgreSQL offers robust performance optimization options, powerful extensions, and a highly customizable platform.
  • It has a strong open-source community, ensuring ongoing improvements and support.
  • PostgreSQL is compatible with popular development frameworks and languages, enhancing its versatility.

Recommended for

  • Organizations seeking a scalable and stable database solution with strong compliance with SQL standards.
  • Developers who need advanced features like custom data types and indexing capabilities.
  • Projects requiring robust transactional integrity and data consistency.
  • Businesses looking for a cost-effective open-source database solution with active community support.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Dgraph 3 videos + Add
PostgreSQL 3 videos + Add

Intro to Slash GraphQL from Dgraph

More videos

  • - Getting started with Dgraph #5: Tweet graph, string indices, and keyword-based searching
  • - Graph Database: Intro to Dgraph's Query Language (2017)

Comparison of PostgreSQL and MongoDB

More videos

  • - PostgreSQL Review
  • - MySQL vs PostgreSQL - Why you shouldn't use MySQL

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Dgraph
PostgreSQL
100% 100%
0% 0%
7% 7%
93% 93%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%

User comments

Share your experience with using Dgraph and PostgreSQL. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

Dgraph no reviews yet
PostgreSQL no reviews yet

We have no reviews of Dgraph yet. Be the first one to post

View more

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Dgraph 21 mentions
PostgreSQL 19 mentions

View more

View more

Alternatives to Dgraph and PostgreSQL

When comparing Dgraph and PostgreSQL, you can also consider the following products.