
Blumira
Komodor
Google StackDriver
ALog ConVerter
CHAOSSEARCH
VirtualMetric
IIS Inspector
Devo delivers real-time operational & business value from analytics on streaming and historical data to operations.

Tantivy
Typesense
OpenSearch
ElasticSearch
Apache Solr
Algolia
Meilisearch
Open-source & cloud-native log management & analytics

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Quickwit seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 14 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | devo.com | github.com |
| Pricing | — | |
| Company | Startup from the United States · 250 - 499 employees · 2011 | — |
| Listed in |
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Devo is recommended for large enterprises, IT professionals, and security teams that require comprehensive log management and real-time data analysis. It's particularly suitable for organizations with extensive data handling needs, looking for reliable and efficient solutions to manage and analyze logs across various applications and systems.
No analysis of Quickwit yet.
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
Devo- Something For Everybody ALBUM REVIEW
More videos
No Quickwit videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


Share your experience with using Devo and Quickwit. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Tracking Devo since Mar 2021.
Nice... it's cool to see how different companies are putting together best fit solutions. I'm also glad that they at least started out with off the shelf apps instead of jumping to something like a bespoke solution early on. Quickwit[1]... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
Https://github.com/quickwit-oss/quickwit to_tsvector in PG never worked well for my use cases SELECT * FROM dump WHERE to_tsvector('english'::regconfig, hh_fullname) @@ to_tsquery('english'::regconfig, 'query'); Wish them to succeed.... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
We tested S3 Express for our search engine quickwit[0] a couple of weeks ago. While this was really satisfying on the performance side, we were a bit disappointed by the price, and I mostly agree with the article on this matter. I can... - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
When comparing Devo and Quickwit, you can also consider the following products.

Blumira's threat detection platform offers both automated threat detection and response, enabling organizations of any size to more efficiently defend against cybersecurity threats in near real-time.
Compare Blumira to Devo or Quickwit:

🐎 On average 2x faster than Lucene 🔎 Full-text search ⚙️ Configurable tokenizer (stemming available for 17 languages) 🚀 Tiny startup time (<10ms) ⌨️ Natural and Phrase Queries ䷴ Range Queries 🛠 Incremental Indexing 💨 Multi-threaded Indexing 🔩 JSON F…
Compare Tantivy to Devo or Quickwit:


Typo tolerant, delightfully simple, open source search 🔍
Compare Typesense to Devo or Quickwit:

Stackdriver provides monitoring services for cloud-powered applications.
Compare Google StackDriver to Devo or Quickwit:

OpenSearch is a community-driven, open source search and analytics suite derived from Apache 2.0 licensed Elasticsearch 7.10.2 & Kibana 7.10.2. It consists of a search engine daemon, and a visualization and user interface, OpenSearch Dashboards.
Compare OpenSearch to Devo or Quickwit: