
Devise
Auth0
Okta
OneLogin
Atlassian Crowd
Amazon Cognito
Google Cloud IAM
Ping Identity
GitBook
Mintlify
Docusaurus
ReadMe
Archbee.io
Confluence
Git
Atlassian Bitbucket Server
Devise is recommended for Ruby on Rails developers looking for a well-established and comprehensive authentication library. It's suitable for projects of various sizes, from startups to enterprise-level applications, particularly when rapid development with standard authentication features is desired.
Based on our record, Devise should be more popular than GitBook. It has been mentiond 47 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
ActiveRubyist is now a Progressive Web App (PWA) with Hotwire-based interactivity. For authentication, I use devise, and for real-time notifications, noticed. Where possible, I lean into default Rails features: for background jobs, I use Solid Queue instead of Sidekiq, keeping everything aligned with the Rails way. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Assume we use devise for authentication. We need to subscribe user for personal notifications channel. Add this line to app/views/layouts/application/_flash_container.html.erb. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
If you like to know how to implement Devise for user authentication, here's the link- Devise. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
Use devise gem, which is probably the most famous rails authentication system. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
IMHO the stateful opaque token approach is simple enough that it can (and often does) get baked into whatever language/framework you’re using to write your app. In addition, the very nature of session tokens is such that the logic for what the token actually means/represents lives in your app, on the server. So, that may be why we don’t see more “opaque session token” standards/libraries out there as an... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
GitBook is simple and clean, and sometimes that’s exactly what you need. I like it for early-stage products or teams with lighter documentation. You’ll eventually hit limits if your structure gets more complex, but if simplicity is your priority, it’s a solid choice. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
TL,DR: LaunchDarkly is great for B2C companies. Bucket is for B2B SaaS products, like GitBook — a modern, AI-integrated documentation platform. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Addison Schultz, Developer Relations Lead at GitBook, puts it simply:. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Good question that led to insightful responses. I would like to bring GitBook (https://gitbook.com) too to the comparison notes (no affiliation). They, too, focus on the collaborative, 'similar-to-git-workflow', and versioned approach towards documentation. Happy to see variety in the 'docs' tools area, and really appreciate it being FOSS. Looking forward to trying out Kalmia on some project soon. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
You can have both a landing page (e.g.: www.your-project.dev) and a documentation website (e.g.: docs.your-project.dev). For creating documentation website GitBook is better fit than Gitlanding. GitBook is free for open source Projects (you just need to issue a request). - Source: dev.to / over 4 years ago
Auth0 - Auth0 is a program for people to get authentication and authorization services for their own business use.
Mintlify - The AI-powered documentation writer. It's documentation that just appears as you build
Okta - Enterprise-grade identity management for all your apps, users & devices
Docusaurus - Easy to maintain open source documentation websites
OneLogin - On-demand SSO, directory integration, user provisioning and more
ReadMe - A collaborative developer hub for your API or code.