
BlueOptima
GitClear
Waydev
CodeClimate
Git analytics
GitPrime
LinearB
Developer productivity and engineering analytics from Git changes. Estimate development effort against a consistent baseline, compare developer, team and contractor contributions, and track trends. Cloud, local and on-premises deployment options.

Waydev
GitPrime
Git analytics
GitClear
Tiempo
SonarQube
Codacy
VS Code extension for automatic programming metrics

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Code Time seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 1 time since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | devghost.pro | software.com |
| Pricing | ||
| Platforms | — | |
| Company | Startup from Portugal · 1 - 9 employees · 2026 | — |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


DevGhost is a developer productivity and engineering analytics platform that helps founders, CTOs, and engineering managers understand work delivered by their teams and development contractors. Git-based effort estimation DevGhost analyzes code changes to estimate development work. Its reference...
No description of Code Time yet.
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing DevGhost.pro and Code Time.
DevGhost.pro's answer
DevGhost estimates the substantive work behind Git changes using a consistent reference: a mid-level developer who knows the codebase and works without AI. This makes contributions comparable beyond commit counts and lines of code. Teams can explore individual output, repository-wide trends, and changes in productivity as development workflows evolve. DevGhost also offers fully local analysis: both code processing and analytics run on your machine, with source code and results staying local.
DevGhost.pro's answer
Choose DevGhost when you need to understand the work delivered by a development team or contractor and compare contributions on a shared scale. It combines effort estimates, developer breakdowns, and productivity timelines in an interactive report. This helps founders and engineering leaders connect progress discussions to actual code changes. With cloud, local, and on-premises options, you can choose a deployment model that fits your workflow and confidentiality requirements.
DevGhost.pro's answer
DevGhost is built for founders, CTOs, engineering managers, and product owners who need visibility into software development. It is especially useful for organizations working with outsourced development teams, agencies, or freelancers, and for leaders trying to understand how AI-assisted development is changing their team's output.
DevGhost.pro's answer
DevGhost is built around a simple question: how much substantive work is actually being delivered? Busy teams, frequent commits, and detailed status reports do not always make that clear. AI-assisted development makes the question even more important, as one developer's output can change dramatically. DevGhost brings code changes onto a common reference scale so founders and engineering leaders can see contributions, follow trends, and have more concrete conversations about delivery.
DevGhost.pro's answer
We do not publish customer names. Engineering productivity and team contribution data can be sensitive, particularly when it involves individual developers or external contractors. We respect the confidentiality of these assessments and the reputations of the people and organizations involved.
DevGhost.pro's answer
DevGhost is built with TypeScript, React, Next.js, and Node.js. Its Python analysis engine uses Git, Tree-sitter, NumPy, and scikit-learn to process and analyze code changes. The web platform uses PostgreSQL with Prisma, while the local edition uses SQLite. The VS Code and Cursor extension combines TypeScript with React-based webviews. The Windows desktop application is built with Electron and shares the local analysis engine. Cloud and on-premises deployment options are supported through Modal and Docker-based infrastructure.
Share your experience with using DevGhost.pro and Code Time. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Tracking DevGhost.pro since Oct 2026.
There are some tools like software.com's devtools suite. It can surface all your throughput metrics as well as give you a "pending reviews" view to see what's waiting. You can also set it up to ping you with things sit around for too long. Source: almost 4 years ago
When comparing DevGhost.pro and Code Time, you can also consider the following products.

BlueOptima introduces transparent metrics to manage software development resources with automation, standardisation and objectivity for the first time.
Compare BlueOptima to DevGhost.pro or Code Time:

Waydev analyzes your codebase from Github, Gitlab, Azure DevOps & Bitbucket to help you bring out the best in your engineers work.
Compare Waydev to DevGhost.pro or Code Time:

Data-driven insight for developer impact and code review
Compare GitClear to DevGhost.pro or Code Time:

GitPrime uses data from any Git based code repository to give management the software engineering metrics needed to move faster and optimize work patterns.
Compare GitPrime to DevGhost.pro or Code Time:
for software developers, teams, and open-source communities
Compare Git analytics to DevGhost.pro or Code Time:

Code Climate provides automated code review for your apps, letting you fix quality and security issues before they hit production. We check every commit, branch and pull request for changes in quality and potential vulnerabilities.
Compare CodeClimate to DevGhost.pro or Code Time: