Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

DevExpress XPO VS RedBeanPHP

Compare DevExpress XPO VS RedBeanPHP and see what are their differences

DevExpress XPO logo DevExpress XPO

Free-of-Charge (without Technical Support), also see GitHub and Benchmarks.

RedBeanPHP logo RedBeanPHP

Backend Development, Databases, and ORMs
  • DevExpress XPO Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-01-04
  • RedBeanPHP Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-19

DevExpress XPO features and specs

  • Integrated Suite
    DevExpress XPO is part of a larger suite of tools offered by DevExpress, allowing for seamless integration and a cohesive development experience with other DevExpress products.
  • Cross-Platform Development
    XPO supports multiple platforms including .NET Core, ASP.NET, and Xamarin, making it a versatile choice for cross-platform database applications.
  • Database Agnostic
    XPO is designed to work with a variety of database systems such as MS SQL Server, MySQL, Oracle, and more, providing flexibility in database management and deployment.
  • Advanced Caching
    Offers efficient data caching mechanisms which can significantly optimize performance and reduce database load during data retrieval operations.
  • LINQ Support
    Supports LINQ queries, enabling developers to write queries in a more readable and maintainable way with strong compile-time type checking.

Possible disadvantages of DevExpress XPO

  • Steep Learning Curve
    For developers not familiar with DevExpress tools, XPO's rich set of features and functionalities can be overwhelming, requiring significant time investment to master.
  • Cost
    XPO is a commercial product, and acquiring a license for it (and possibly the entire DevExpress suite) may not be cost-effective for small teams or independent developers.
  • Overhead
    The abstraction and features provided by XPO can introduce additional overhead, potentially impacting performance if not managed properly.
  • Limited Documentation
    While DevExpress provides documentation, it may not be as extensive or as community-driven as more widely-used ORM tools, limiting learning resources and community support.
  • Vendor Lock-in
    Using XPO ties your development to DevExpress technology stack, which can complicate moving away to other ORM solutions in the future if needed.

RedBeanPHP features and specs

  • Simplicity
    RedBeanPHP offers a very simple and straightforward API for database interactions, which makes it easy to learn and use for beginners and those who want to quickly implement basic CRUD operations without extensive configuration.
  • No Configuration Required
    It requires no configuration or set-up files, allowing developers to create models and persist data without any initial setup, which can significantly reduce development time.
  • Automatic Schema Generation
    RedBeanPHP automatically creates and modifies database schemas based on the code usage, which helps in rapid prototyping and reducing the overhead of managing database changes manually.
  • Flexibility
    It allows developers to work without predefined models, enabling dynamic and flexible data modeling that can adapt as requirements change.
  • Community and Documentation
    RedBeanPHP has a supportive community and extensive documentation that can help resolve issues quickly and understand the framework deeply.

Possible disadvantages of RedBeanPHP

  • Performance Overhead
    Because of its on-the-fly schema generation and dynamic nature, RedBeanPHP can lead to performance overhead compared to more traditional ORMs with predefined schemas and models.
  • Limited Control
    The automatic handling of database schemas means less control for developers over the database structure, which can be a downside for projects requiring highly optimized and finely-tuned databases.
  • Not Suited for Large Projects
    RedBeanPHP is generally not recommended for very large projects where precise control over database schema and query optimization is crucial due to its dynamic nature.
  • Feature Limitations
    While suitable for CRUD operations, RedBeanPHP might lack advanced features and fine-grained control found in more established ORMs or database abstraction layers.
  • Complex Relational Mapping
    Handling complex relational database designs might be cumbersome as RedBeanPHP is more geared towards straightforward use cases.

DevExpress XPO videos

No DevExpress XPO videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

RedBeanPHP videos

ะกะพะทะดะฐะฝะธะต ัะพะฑัั‚ะฒะตะฝะฝะพะณะพ ั„ั€ะตะนะผะฒะพั€ะบะฐ. ORM ะฑะธะฑะปะธะพั‚ะตะบะฐ RedBeanPHP. ะฃั€ะพะบ 7

More videos:

  • Review - RedBeanPHP ะดะปั ัะฐะผั‹ั… ะผะฐะปะตะฝัŒะบะธั… ะธ ั‚ัƒะฟั‹ั… | ะฃั€ะพะบ ะฟะพ ORM RedBeanPHP

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to DevExpress XPO and RedBeanPHP)
Databases
56 56%
44% 44
Web Frameworks
57 57%
43% 43
Backend Development
50 50%
50% 50
Custom Search Engine
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using DevExpress XPO and RedBeanPHP. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing DevExpress XPO and RedBeanPHP, you can also consider the following products

LLBLGen Pro - LLBLGen Pro: Using databases in your .NET code made easy. The entity modeling solution for Entity Framework, LLBLGen Pro Runtime Framework, NHibernate and Linq to SQL.

Eloquent ORM - [READ ONLY] Subtree split of the Illuminate Database component (see laravel/framework) - illuminate/database

Hibernate ORM - Hibernate team account. Hibernate is a suite of open source projects around domain models. The flagship project is Hibernate ORM, the Object Relational Mapper.

Nette - Home Page. Let's create the home page displaying your recent posts. Before we start, you should know at least some basics about Model-View-Presenter design pattern (similar to MVC ):. Model โ€“ data manipulation layer.

Entity Framework - See Comparison of Entity Framework vs NHibernate.

JDBI - See this.