Software Alternatives & Startups

deverywhere VS ccusage

Compare deverywhere VS ccusage and see what are their differences

deverywhere

Control Claude Code, Codex, or any other CLI running on your PC - from your phone. Full terminal. Session resume. Port forwarding. ADB over web.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Freemium Free trial $14.99 / Monthly
ccusage

Usage analysis tool for coding (agent) CLIs

Rating
0 reviews

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, ccusage seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 1 time since March 2021.

social mentions
0 vs 1
Terminal Tools popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
3 vs 32

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

deverywhere
ccusage
Website deverywhere.io ccusage.com
Pricing
Freemium Free trial $14.99 / Monthly Official pricing
Platforms
Android Windows
—
Listed in

About deverywhere and ccusage

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

deverywhere
ccusage

Control Claude Code, Codex terminals running on your PC, right from your phone - via web relay. Keep developing anywhere you are. Receive notifications when your coding agent asks a question or finishes a task. Connect to local dev server on your PC via port forwarding, and even debug your phone...

Read more about deverywhere

No description of ccusage yet.

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

deverywhere 3 features
ccusage 5 features
  • Control PC Terminals From Your PHone
    Actual terminal, right on your phone. Colors, slash commands, fully in sync with your PC
  • Port Forwarding
    Running a dev server on your PC? Connect to it from your phone, from anywhere - via deverywhere port forwarding over web
  • Android Debug Over Web
    Develop your Android app on your PC - and upload it to your phone via web, even when you are away
  • Easy to use CLI
    ccusage provides a simple command-line interface for analyzing Claude Code usage from local JSONL files, making it quick to get started without complex setup.
  • Detailed cost breakdown
    It offers detailed reports on token usage and costs broken down by day, month, session, or billing blocks, helping users understand exactly where their usage and spending are going.
  • No API key required
    Since it reads local usage data files directly rather than calling an API, it doesn't require additional API keys or credentials to generate reports.
  • Open source and free
    ccusage is an open-source tool, allowing users to inspect, modify, and contribute to the codebase, and use it without licensing costs.
  • Multiple output formats
    It supports various output formats including tables and JSON, making it flexible for both human review and integration into other scripts or dashboards.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited to Claude Code
    ccusage is specifically designed for analyzing Claude Code usage data, so it isn't useful for tracking usage of other AI tools or platforms.
  • Depends on local data files
    The tool relies on local JSONL log files generated by Claude Code, so if those files are missing, corrupted, or in an unexpected format, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate.
  • Requires Node.js environment
    Since it's a CLI tool typically run via Node.js or npm/npx, users need to have a compatible JavaScript runtime installed, which may be a barrier for non-developers.
  • Manual updates needed
    As Claude Code's data format or features evolve, ccusage may require manual updates to stay compatible, and users need to keep the tool updated themselves.
  • Limited visualization options
    The tool primarily focuses on text-based or tabular output, lacking built-in rich graphical visualizations that some users might want for deeper analysis.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

deverywhere
ccusage

Overall verdict

  • I don't have verified, specific information about deverywhere.io in my training data, so I can't confirm its features, pricing, reliability, or user reviews with confidence. I'd recommend checking recent third-party reviews, its official website, and user communities (like Reddit, Twitter/X, or G2/Capterra if listed) before forming a judgment.

Why this product is good

  • Insufficient verified data available to confirm specific strengths or unique selling points
  • Unable to validate claims about performance, pricing, or reliability without direct or updated sources
  • Recommend consulting the official site, changelogs, or independent reviews for accurate, up-to-date details

Recommended for

  • Users who can independently verify legitimacy and reviews before committing
  • Those comfortable testing new or niche tools with limited public track record
  • Early adopters interested in evaluating unproven services firsthand

No analysis of ccusage yet.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
deverywhere
ccusage
100% 100%
0% 0%
22% 22%
78% 78%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
AI
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using deverywhere and ccusage. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

deverywhere 0 mentions
ccusage 1 mention

Tracking deverywhere since Jun 2026.

  • tokenmaxxing: track AI coding usage across tools and devices
    Tokenmaxxing is our open-source CLI and public leaderboard for bringing those daily totals together. It builds on ccusage and syncs usage to one public profile. - Source: dev.to / 2 days ago

Alternatives to deverywhere and ccusage

When comparing deverywhere and ccusage, you can also consider the following products.