Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

DefenseCode ThunderScan® VS Polyspace

Compare DefenseCode ThunderScan® VS Polyspace and see what are their differences

DefenseCode ThunderScan® logo DefenseCode ThunderScan®

DefenseCode ThunderScan® is a SAST (Static Application Security Testing, WhiteBox Testing) solution for performing deep and extensive security analysis of application source code.

Polyspace logo Polyspace

Polyspace is a suite of static code analysis products developed by Matlab to help software developers, QA Testers, and engineers find critical problems in their code and fix them before they become a serious threat.
  • DefenseCode ThunderScan® Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-07-16
  • Polyspace Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-12-01

DefenseCode ThunderScan® features and specs

  • Comprehensive Analysis
    ThunderScan® provides thorough static application security testing (SAST), allowing for detailed analysis of source code and detection of vulnerabilities.
  • Language Support
    The tool supports a wide range of programming languages, making it versatile and adaptable for different development environments.
  • Integration
    It integrates well with various CI/CD pipelines, enhancing continuous development workflows by providing automated security checks.
  • User Interface
    ThunderScan® features an intuitive and user-friendly interface, making it accessible for users with varying levels of technical expertise.
  • Comprehensive Reporting
    The tool offers detailed reports with insights into identified vulnerabilities, including potential impacts and remediation advice.

Possible disadvantages of DefenseCode ThunderScan®

  • Resource Intensive
    The scanning process can be resource-heavy, potentially affecting the performance of other applications running on the same system.
  • Initial Setup
    The initial setup and configuration of ThunderScan® can be time-consuming, requiring a significant investment of time and expertise.
  • False Positives
    Like many SAST tools, ThunderScan® may generate false positives, requiring manual review to distinguish genuine issues from non-issues.
  • License Cost
    The licensing cost for ThunderScan® can be high, which might be prohibitive for smaller organizations or projects with limited budgets.
  • Dependency Limitations
    The tool may have limitations in scanning certain complex dependencies or legacy systems, potentially missing vulnerabilities in those areas.

Polyspace features and specs

  • Static Code Analysis
    Polyspace offers advanced static code analysis which helps in detecting run-time errors, integer overflow, division by zero, and other issues without executing the program.
  • MISRA Compliance
    It provides checking for compliance with coding standards such as MISRA, making it easier to adhere to industry standards.
  • Automatic Bug Detection
    Polyspace automatically identifies potential bugs and vulnerabilities in the code, which can significantly reduce debugging time during development.
  • Concurrency Analysis
    The tool checks for potential issues in concurrent executions, like data races and deadlocks, enhancing the reliability of multi-threaded applications.
  • Extensive Language Support
    It supports multiple programming languages such as C, C++, and Ada, making it versatile for various types of software projects.

Possible disadvantages of Polyspace

  • Cost
    Polyspace is a commercial tool, which can be expensive for small businesses or individual developers with limited budgets.
  • Complexity
    The extensive features and capabilities can result in a steep learning curve, requiring significant time to master effectively.
  • Resource Intensive
    Static code analysis can be resource-intensive, potentially slowing down the development process, particularly for larger codebases.
  • Integration Challenges
    Integrating Polyspace with existing development workflows and IDEs may pose challenges, especially if teams use heterogeneous toolchains.
  • False Positives
    Like many static analysis tools, Polyspace can generate false positives, which require manual review to discern true issues from noise.

Analysis of DefenseCode ThunderScan®

Overall verdict

  • DefenseCode ThunderScan is a solid, mature Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solution well-regarded for its accuracy and broad language support, making it a good choice for organizations focused on securing their source code.

Why this product is good

  • Comprehensive Static Application Security Testing (SAST) that analyzes source code without needing to execute it
  • Supports a wide range of programming languages including Java, C/C++, C#, PHP, JavaScript, Python, Ruby, and more
  • Detects common and complex vulnerabilities aligned with standards like OWASP Top 10, SANS Top 25, PCI DSS, and HIPAA
  • Integrates into the software development lifecycle (SDLC) and CI/CD pipelines for early detection of security flaws
  • Provides detailed reports with vulnerability descriptions, severity levels, and remediation guidance
  • Established vendor with a focus on application security and reasonable pricing compared to some larger competitors

Recommended for

  • Development teams wanting to integrate security testing into their CI/CD pipelines
  • Organizations that need to scan large codebases across multiple programming languages
  • Companies needing to meet compliance requirements such as PCI DSS, HIPAA, or OWASP standards
  • Security teams and DevSecOps practitioners seeking early detection of code-level vulnerabilities
  • Enterprises and mid-sized businesses building or maintaining custom software applications

DefenseCode ThunderScan® videos

No DefenseCode ThunderScan® videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Polyspace videos

What is Polyspace Bug Finder? - Polyspace Bug Finder Overview

More videos:

  • Review - Shift Left with Polyspace: Find Bugs as You Code

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to DefenseCode ThunderScan® and Polyspace)
Code Analysis
25 25%
75% 75
Code Coverage
43 43%
57% 57
Tool
0 0%
100% 100
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using DefenseCode ThunderScan® and Polyspace. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare DefenseCode ThunderScan® and Polyspace

DefenseCode ThunderScan® Reviews

We have no reviews of DefenseCode ThunderScan® yet.
Be the first one to post

Polyspace Reviews

Top 9 C++ Static Code Analysis Tools
Polyspace is a static analysis tool that identifies and fixes, or proves the absence of, potential run-time errors (such as divide-by-zero) and checks if the source code follows code standards like MISRA C, MISRA C++, and JSF++. In addition, it highlights unproven checks that must be reviewed manually. It is commonly used in the embedded software arena (especially in...

What are some alternatives?

When comparing DefenseCode ThunderScan® and Polyspace, you can also consider the following products

SonarQube - SonarQube, a core component of the Sonar solution, is an open source, self-managed tool that systematically helps developers and organizations deliver Clean Code.

Cppcheck - Cppcheck is an analysis tool for C/C++ code. It detects the types of bugs that the compilers normally fail to detect. The goal is no false positives. CppCheckDownload cppcheck for free.

Kiuwan Application Security - Kiuwan Application Security is an end-to-end Appsec platform.

lgtm.com - lgtm.com is a platform for code analytics.

Codacy - Automatically reviews code style, security, duplication, complexity, and coverage on every change while tracking code quality throughout your sprints.

Clang Static Analyzer - The Clang Static Analyzer is a source code analysis tool that finds bugs in C, C++, and Objective-C...