Software Alternatives & Startups

Deadpendency VS Phishtime

Compare Deadpendency VS Phishtime and see what are their differences

Deadpendency

Automated software dependency project health tracking

Rating
0 reviews
Phishtime

Phishtime runs realistic phishing simulations and security awareness training to reduce employees' susceptibility to phishing attacks.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Freemium Free trial €24.5 / Monthly (Min 25 users - Starter plan)
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Deadpendency seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 2 times since March 2021.

social mentions
2 vs 0
Software Development popularity
100% vs 0%

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Deadpendency
Phishtime
Website deadpendency.com phishtime.com
Pricing
Freemium Free trial €24.5 / Monthly (Min 25 users - Starter plan) Official pricing
Listed in

About Deadpendency and Phishtime

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

Deadpendency
Phishtime

No description of Deadpendency yet.

Phishtime is a phishing simulation and security awareness training platform that helps small to mid-sized businesses and enterprises across industries reduce human-layer cybersecurity risk. The software is cloud-based, making it accessible without on-premises installation and includes a free plan...

Read more about Phishtime

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Deadpendency 5 features
Phishtime 5 features
  • Automated Dependency Monitoring
    Deadpendency automatically checks your project's dependencies for signs of being dead, unmaintained, or deprecated, saving developers from manually tracking the health of each dependency.
  • GitHub Integration
    Deadpendency integrates directly with GitHub as a GitHub App, making it easy to set up and run as part of your existing pull request and CI workflow without requiring additional infrastructure.
  • Early Warning System
    By catching dead or unmaintained dependencies early, Deadpendency helps teams avoid security risks and technical debt that come from relying on abandoned libraries.
  • Multi-Language Support
    Deadpendency supports a wide range of programming languages and package ecosystems, making it useful for polyglot projects and diverse development teams.
  • Low Configuration Overhead
    The tool is designed to work out of the box with minimal configuration, allowing teams to get value quickly without spending significant time on setup and customization.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited to GitHub
    Deadpendency is primarily a GitHub App, which means teams using other platforms like GitLab or Bitbucket cannot easily use the service without switching or mirroring their repositories.
  • Potential False Positives
    The tool may flag dependencies as dead or unmaintained based on activity metrics, even when a library is stable and simply mature, leading to unnecessary concern or migration efforts.
  • Niche Use Case
    Dependency health checking is a relatively narrow function. Teams may prefer more comprehensive dependency management tools that also handle vulnerability scanning, license compliance, and version updates in one solution.
  • Reliance on External Signals
    Deadpendency relies on external signals like repository activity and release frequency to determine dependency health, which may not always accurately reflect the true maintenance status of a project.
  • Limited Community and Ecosystem
    As a relatively niche tool, Deadpendency has a smaller user community compared to alternatives like Dependabot or Renovate, which can mean fewer resources, community support, and third-party integrations.
  • Focused on phishing protection
    Phishtime specializes in detecting and blocking phishing threats rather than being a general security suite. This can mean more targeted detection of fake login pages, credential-harvesting sites and deceptive links.
  • Real-time, proactive detection
    The service is positioned as detecting phishing sites as users encounter them, rather than relying only on static blocklists. That approach can help catch newly created or zero-day phishing pages that traditional lists miss.
  • Lightweight deployment
    Protection of this kind is typically delivered through a browser extension or similar lightweight integration. That makes it easy to roll out to individuals or small teams without heavy infrastructure or IT overhead.
  • Reduces risk of credential theft
    By warning users or blocking access to suspicious pages before credentials are entered, it addresses one of the most common causes of account compromise and data breaches. It adds a safety net for human error.
  • Useful complement to existing defenses
    It can work alongside email gateways, antivirus and security awareness training, adding a layer at the point where users click. This is helpful for catching phishing that arrives via channels other than email, such as SMS, chat or social media.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Deadpendency
Phishtime

Overall verdict

  • Deadpendency is a solid choice for teams needing automated dependency health monitoring, particularly for tracking deprecated, unmaintained, or archived packages that traditional vulnerability scanners often miss, integrating cleanly into CI workflows via GitHub Actions.

Why this product is good

  • Focuses specifically on dependency 'deadness' (deprecated, archived, unmaintained packages) rather than just security vulnerabilities, filling a gap left by tools like Dependabot
  • Simple integration as a GitHub Action, making it easy to add to existing CI/CD pipelines without heavy configuration
  • Provides clear, actionable reports that help developers proactively address technical debt before it becomes a security or maintenance liability
  • Supports multiple language ecosystems, offering broad applicability across different tech stacks
  • Lightweight and automated approach reduces manual auditing effort for dependency health

Recommended for

  • Development teams wanting to proactively manage technical debt in their dependency trees
  • Open source maintainers looking to keep their projects' dependencies healthy and current
  • Organizations using GitHub Actions for CI/CD who want an easy-to-integrate dependency health check
  • Security-conscious teams who want visibility into unmaintained packages that could pose future risks
  • Projects with many dependencies where manual tracking of deprecation status is impractical

No analysis of Phishtime yet.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Deadpendency
Phishtime
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using Deadpendency and Phishtime. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Deadpendency 2 mentions
Phishtime 0 mentions
  • Deadpendency Open Sourced
    I created a tiny startup in Haskell which failed RIP. I decided to open source the code though. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Twitch Streamers?
    I sometimes stream my Haskell work on deadpendency - https://www.twitch.tv/alistairbuzz. Source: over 5 years ago

Tracking Phishtime since Sep 2026.