Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Datomic VS SST

Compare Datomic VS SST and see what are their differences

RepDB
Exercise dataset for fitness apps: transparent background, animations, no subscription featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. ยป Base Details
  2. ยป Videos
  3. ยป Reviews
  4. ยป Alternatives

Datomic logo Datomic

The fully transactional, cloud-ready, distributed database

SST logo SST

Work on your serverless apps live
  • Datomic Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-14
  • SST Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-27

Datomic features and specs

  • Immutability
    Datomic employs an append-only data model where data is never overwritten but instead appended, ensuring historical data is always available and providing strong consistency.
  • Time Travel Queries
    Datomic allows you to query the database as of any point in time, facilitating auditing and debugging by allowing easy access to historical data states.
  • Rich Data Model
    Supports complex data types like maps and sets directly within its schema, providing a flexible way to represent data.
  • ACID Transactions
    Datomic supports fully ACID-compliant transactions, ensuring reliable and predictable database operations.
  • Scalability
    Separates storage and compute, allowing for horizontal scaling of read operations, making it suitable for handling large datasets.
  • Query Flexibility
    Offers a powerful query language that supports recursive queries, making it suitable for complex data retrieval needs.

Possible disadvantages of Datomic

  • Complexity
    The architecture of Datomic can be complex to understand and implement, particularly for teams unfamiliar with its design principles.
  • Cost
    Can be expensive to operate, especially in a cloud environment, where costs increase with the amount of data stored and the compute resources required.
  • Limited Write Throughput
    Due to its append-only design, Datomic can have limited write throughput, which may not be suitable for applications with heavy write requirements.
  • Closed Source
    Datomic is a proprietary database system, which may not appeal to organizations that prefer open-source solutions.
  • Learning Curve
    Requires a learning curve as its conceptual model and query language are different from traditional databases, potentially requiring additional training.
  • Dependency on AWS
    Relying on AWS ecosystem for the storage backend can limit choices for deployment environments, impacting flexibility.

SST features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    SST is designed to simplify the process of building serverless applications, providing developers with higher-level abstractions and tools that streamline development.
  • Integration with AWS
    SST is well-integrated with AWS services, allowing developers to leverage the full power of AWS infrastructure while maintaining a focus on serverless architecture.
  • Live Lambda Development
    SST supports live Lambda development, enabling developers to make real-time changes and see them reflected immediately without the need for lengthy deployment processes.
  • Infrastructure as Code
    With SST, developers can define their infrastructure programmatically, which promotes version control, scalability, and collaboration among team members.
  • Flexibility
    SST provides flexibility to developers, allowing them to use popular libraries and frameworks alongside serverless components, thus accommodating various use cases.

Possible disadvantages of SST

  • Learning Curve
    Developers unfamiliar with SST and its abstractions may face a learning curve in understanding how to effectively use the toolkit and take full advantage of its features.
  • AWS Lock-in
    As SST is tightly integrated with AWS services, it can lead to vendor lock-in, making it challenging for organizations to switch to other cloud providers in the future.
  • Complexity for Small Projects
    For smaller projects, the overhead introduced by SST's abstractions and tooling might be unnecessary, adding complexity without significant benefits.
  • Dependency on Community Support
    SST relies on community support for maintenance and feature development, which could pose a risk if the community's interest wanes or if support does not keep pace with AWS innovations.

Datomic videos

+ Add

KotlinConf 2018 - Datomic: The Most Innovative DB You've Never Heard Of by August Lilleaas

More videos:

  • Review - "Real-World Datomic: An Experience Report" by Craig Andera (2013)
  • Review - Rich Hickey on Datomic Ions, September 12, 2018

SST videos

+ Add

Performix sst review fat burner

More videos:

  • Review - Hornady 129gr SST Recovered Bullet Review: 6.5 Creedmoor Deer Load ๐ŸฆŒ
  • Review - SST Energy Seltzer Review; The Energy Drink by Performix.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Datomic and SST)

Datomic

SST

Databases
100 100%
Databases
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
Developer Tools
100% 100
NoSQL Databases
100 100%
NoSQL Databases
0% 0
Open Source
0 0%
Open Source
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Datomic and SST. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, SST seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 31 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Datomic mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Datomic yet. Tracking of Datomic recommendations started around Mar 2021.

SST mentions (31)

  • Best/low maintenance devops toolchain for basic sass?
    After researching all night, https://github.com/serverless-stack/sst seems like a good trade off between flexibility, simplicity and features. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Dynamodb design with Appsync
    I use https://github.com/serverless-stack/serverless-stack โ€” not the serverless project. This one is far better. Source: over 4 years ago
  • A magical AWS serverless developer experience
    That said: SST is open source, so you could maybe somehow reimplement their debug stack which is the websockets magic + the Lambda shim in terraform to get it working... Source: over 4 years ago
  • Anti-Patterns to Avoid in Lambda Based Apps
    If you are using CDK then check out SST: https://github.com/serverless-stack/serverless-stack It's based on CDK and has a great local development environment for Lambda. It allows you to set breakpoints and test it locally: https://serverless-stack.com/examples/how-to-debug-lambda-functions-with-visual-studio-code.html. - Source: Hacker News / almost 5 years ago
  • Introducing Serverless Cloud: AWS Serverless Power for Back-Endsโ€”Without the Complexity
    I'll just plug what we built, SST: https://github.com/serverless-stack/serverless-stack. Source: almost 5 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Datomic and SST, you can also consider the following products

MySQL - The world's most popular open source database

Netlify - Build, deploy and host your static site or app with a drag and drop interface and automatic delpoys from GitHub or Bitbucket

MarkLogic Server - MarkLogic Server is a multi-model database that has both NoSQL and trusted enterprise data management capabilities.

Coolify - An open-source, hassle-free, self-hostable Heroku & Netlify alternative.

Valentina Server - Valentina Server is 3 in 1: Valentina DB Server / SQLite Server / Report Server

Vercel - Vercel is the platform for frontend developers, providing the speed and reliability innovators need to create at the moment of inspiration.

Loading...