Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

cvechecker VS snort

Compare cvechecker VS snort and see what are their differences

PlexTrac
PlexTrac is the #1 AI-powered platform for pentest reporting and threat exposure management, helping cybersecurity teams efficiently address the most critical threats and vulnerabilities. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

cvechecker logo cvechecker

The goal of cvechecker is to report about possible vulnerabilities on your system, by scanning the...

snort logo snort

Snort is a free and open source network intrusion prevention system.
  • cvechecker Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-25
  • snort Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-06-20

cvechecker features and specs

  • Open Source
    cvechecker is freely available and can be modified to suit specific needs, allowing for transparency and flexibility in its use.
  • Active Community Support
    Being hosted on GitHub, it benefits from community contributions, including bug fixes, features, and real-world use-case improvements.
  • Frequent Updates
    The tool is regularly updated with the latest CVE data, enabling users to stay informed about recent vulnerabilities.
  • Lightweight
    Designed to be lightweight, it doesn’t require significant system resources to run, making it suitable for a wide range of environments.
  • Easy Integration
    Can be easily integrated into existing systems and workflows with a straightforward setup process, making it accessible for various use cases.

Possible disadvantages of cvechecker

  • Limited Features
    Compared to some commercial alternatives, cvechecker may lack advanced features such as automated patching or deep analytics.
  • Command-Line Interface
    Requires familiarity with command-line operations, which may pose a challenge for users with limited technical expertise.
  • Manual Updates
    While frequent, updates generally need to be applied manually, requiring regular user intervention to ensure the tool remains current.
  • Potential for Incomplete Data
    Since it relies on publicly available CVE information, there may be instances of incomplete or missing data for newly discovered vulnerabilities.
  • Lack of Professional Support
    Being an open-source and community-driven project, it lacks dedicated professional support, which may be a downside for enterprise users requiring robust support services.

snort features and specs

  • Open Source
    Snort is open-source software, which means that it is free to use and has a community of developers who keep it updated and secure.
  • Real-time Traffic Analysis
    Snort provides real-time traffic analysis and packet logging capabilities, enabling quick detection and response to potential threats.
  • Flexibility
    The software supports a range of deployment options and can be customized to meet the specific security needs of an organization.
  • Signature-based Detection
    Snort uses a robust signature-based detection method to identify and respond to known threats based on rule sets.
  • Community Support
    There is a strong community of users and contributors who provide support, documentation, and regular updates to Snort.
  • Integration Capabilities
    Snort can be integrated with various other security tools and systems, enhancing its functionality and providing a comprehensive security solution.

Possible disadvantages of snort

  • Complex Setup
    Snort can be complex to configure and deploy, requiring a certain level of expertise in network security and intrusion detection systems.
  • High Resource Consumption
    The software can be resource-intensive, especially in large network environments, which may require significant hardware investments.
  • Signature Updates
    The effectiveness of Snort heavily depends on the timely updating of signatures to protect against new threats; failing to do so can leave vulnerabilities.
  • False Positives
    Like many IDS systems, Snort can generate false positives, which may lead to unnecessary alerts and the need for careful tuning to minimize them.
  • Limited Zero-Day Threat Detection
    While Snort is excellent at detecting known threats through its signatures, it is less effective against zero-day threats that are not yet documented.
  • Maintenance Burden
    Ongoing maintenance and monitoring are required to keep Snort effective, which can be time-consuming for security teams.

Analysis of snort

Overall verdict

  • Yes, Snort is generally regarded as a reliable and effective tool for network security.

Why this product is good

  • Snort is considered a good intrusion detection and prevention system (IDPS) because it is open-source, highly configurable, and widely used by both professionals and organizations. It offers real-time traffic analysis and packet logging, robust rule-based logging, and protocol analysis, making it effective for detecting various types of network attacks and misuse.

Recommended for

  • Network security professionals looking for a robust intrusion detection and prevention system.
  • Organizations needing a cost-effective and customizable security solution.
  • IT departments that require a well-documented and community-supported security tool.

cvechecker videos

No cvechecker videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

snort videos

+ Add

Network Intrusion Detection Systems (SNORT)

More videos:

  • Review - Intrusion Detection System for Windows (SNORT)
  • Review - Massive Beer Review 2692 Bolero Snort Brewing Crushable Hazie IPA

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to cvechecker and snort)

cvechecker

snort

Web Application Security
100 100%
Web Application Security
0% 0
Security & Privacy
0 0%
Security & Privacy
100% 100
Security
100 100%
Security
0% 0
Tool
0 0%
Tool
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using cvechecker and snort. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare cvechecker and snort

cvechecker Reviews

We have no reviews of cvechecker yet.
Be the first one to post

snort Reviews

8 Best Open Source SIEM Tools
Snort is an open-source intrusion detection and prevention system that you can use for real-time network traffic analysis and packet logging on IP networks. You can also use Snort to detect attacks or possible probes. You can configure Snort to work in three main modes:
Source: www.logiq.ai
The Top 14 Free and Open Source SIEM Tools For 2022
It is also equipped with log analysis capabilities and the ability to display traffic or dump streams of packets to log files. Users have access to a user manual, FAQ file and guides on how to locate and use Oinkcode. Snort has three great uses:
Source: logit.io

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, snort seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 7 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

cvechecker mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of cvechecker yet. Tracking of cvechecker recommendations started around Mar 2021.

snort mentions (7)

  • What is a Denial of Service (DoS) Attack? A Comprehensive Guide
    Snort - Open-source Intrusion Prevention System for network security. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • Who does check linux distros of malware - open source
    Linux has (free) tools to improve security and detect/remove malware: Lynis,Chkrootkit,Rkhunter,ClamAV,Vuls,LMD,radare2,Yara,ntopng,maltrail,Snort,Suricata... Source: almost 2 years ago
  • NETGATE 4100 - Snort Fatal Error on new install
    Okay I figured it out. The problem occurs when you're only using the community rules for Snort. If you go to snort.org and register for a free or subscriber "oink" code, enter the code in pfSense and update the rules then it magically works as expected. My best guess is that unicode information get's added when the new rules are updated. At any rate, this worked for me. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Trying to learn Rogue Device Detection
    Snort (not an insult) https://snort.org/. Source: about 3 years ago
  • Snort Subscriber Ruleset - Not Downloaded - error code 422 - md5 download failed
    422 supposedly means the requested file doesn't exist, and sure enough if you look on the snort.org rules downloads page there is no file for version 29180. Source: almost 4 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing cvechecker and snort, you can also consider the following products

Dependency-Check - Dependency-Check is a utility that identifies project dependencies and checks if there are any...

Suricata - Suricata is a high performance Network IDS, IPS and Network Security Monitoring engine.

Retire.js - Retire.js : What you require you must also retire

McAfee Network Security Platform - McAfee Network Security Platform guards all your network-connected devices from zero-day and other attacks, with a cost-effective network intrusion prevention system.

IVRE - Network recon framework, including a web interface to browse Nmap scan results.

Imunify360 - Imunify360 is a comprehensive security suite for Linux web servers. It includes antivirus, firewall, WAF, PHP Security Layers, Patch Management, Domain reputation with easy UI and advanced automation.

Loading...