
ClaudeUsageBar
Magic Flow
ilha
Lancetta
AgentPeek
whoburnedmore
Conductor for Coding Agents
Never hit limit unexpectedly again - on macOS, iOS, Android

Automated software dependency project health tracking

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Deadpendency seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 2 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | custats.info | deadpendency.com |
| Pricing | — | |
| Listed in |
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


No features have been listed yet.
Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


No analysis of CUStats yet.
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


Share your experience with using CUStats and Deadpendency. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Tracking CUStats since Oct 2026.
I created a tiny startup in Haskell which failed RIP. I decided to open source the code though. Source: over 3 years ago
I sometimes stream my Haskell work on deadpendency - https://www.twitch.tv/alistairbuzz. Source: over 5 years ago
When comparing CUStats and Deadpendency, you can also consider the following products.

Know exactly how much Claude you have left at a glance
Compare ClaudeUsageBar to CUStats or Deadpendency:

Generate high-converting landing page copy using GPT-3
Compare Magic Flow to CUStats or Deadpendency:


Know when to push your coding agents, and when to ease off
Compare Lancetta to CUStats or Deadpendency:


Spotify Wrapped for Claude, Codex & a Public leaderboard.
Compare whoburnedmore to CUStats or Deadpendency: