
Claude Code
GitHub Copilot
Windsurf Editor
Google Antigravity
warp by spolu
Lovable
Codex 3.0 by OpenAI
The AI-first Code Editor. Build software faster in an editor designed for pair-programming with AI.

Flexjobs
Jobicy
Breezy.hr
WeWorkRemotely
Workable
Remote OK
Remotive
AI training and a human-graded certification, plus a screened board of AI jobs, gigs and paid AI training programmes. The board is free and public with no signup; training and certification are the paid membership.

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Cursor seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 12 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | cursor.com | getaiwork.com |
| Pricing | — | |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


No description of Cursor yet.
getAIwork is a membership for people who want to work with AI. It combines bite-size AI training in 20-minute daily lessons, a certification graded by a human on real project work, and a jobs board where an AI pipeline has screened 39,389 postings to date, with every live listing approved by hand...
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Cursor is recommended for small to medium-sized businesses looking for an efficient customer relationship management (CRM) solution. It's ideal for teams that need an integrated system to manage customer interactions, support operations, and sales tracking.
No analysis of getAIwork yet.
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
Why I QUIT VS Code for Cursor AI (Honest Review + Beginner Tutorial)
More videos
No getAIwork videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing Cursor and getAIwork.
getAIwork's answer:
The published articles run on WordPress.
The Work Board and the pipeline behind it are custom built. Listings are ingested from multiple job sources several times a day, passed through an automated screening and de-duplication pass, then queued for human approval before anything appears publicly. Filled and expired roles are removed on the same daily cycle.
Aggregate statistics are generated from that pipeline and published as static JSON at getaiwork.com/stats.json under an open attribution licence, alongside a human-readable version at getaiwork.com/stats.
getAIwork's answer:
It started from screening job postings in bulk and noticing how much of what circulates about AI work is either out of date or simply invented. Boards were full of roles that had closed weeks earlier, and articles quoted earnings figures nobody could source.
The response was to build the boring version. Screen everything, have a human approve what goes live, delete listings the day they are filled, quote pay only as the posting states it, and publish the underlying counts openly so anyone can check them.
The training and certification grew out of the same work. Screening tens of thousands of postings shows you fairly clearly what employers actually ask for, which turns out to be a better curriculum than guessing.
getAIwork's answer:
Only if the screening is what you care about. If you want maximum volume, a large aggregator will always list more roles. getAIwork deliberately lists fewer, because a person removes the ones that are filled, duplicated or not genuine.
The Work Board is also free and public, with no signup and nothing to buy. That is unusual in this category, where screening is normally the thing kept behind the paywall. The paid membership is the training and the human-graded certification, not access to the listings.
And pay is shown exactly as each posting states it, never estimated or modelled. There are no income claims anywhere on the site, which rules getAIwork out for anyone looking to be told what they will earn.
getAIwork's answer:
Two things, both fairly unglamorous.
First, every listing on the Work Board is approved by a person before it goes live, and listings are deleted the day the role is filled rather than left to decay. Most boards in this space aggregate automatically and let expired postings pile up, which is the standing complaint readers have about nearly all of them. Removing listings is the unglamorous, permanent job that makes the board worth trusting.
Second, the underlying market data is published openly instead of being kept as a marketing asset. 39,389 postings screened to date, roughly 1,363 live at any one time, and listed pay aggregated into percentile bands by field. It is published at getaiwork.com/stats and as machine-readable JSON at getaiwork.com/stats.json, free to reuse with attribution, so everything claimed above is checkable rather than asserted.
getAIwork's answer:
People trying to get into AI work, rather than people already established in it. Roughly three groups.
Career changers with no AI background looking for a realistic entry point. Freelancers and contractors adding AI work to what they already do. And people looking specifically for recurring paid platform programmes, meaning annotation, evaluation and model-training work, which is now close to half of everything open on the board.
The audience is global rather than US-centric, and a meaningful share are non-coders: writing-centred work is about 27% of currently open listings, against 68% technical.
On remote, the honest figure is that 564 of 1,351 currently open listings are tagged remote, about 42%. That share has drifted down slightly since late August rather than up, so this is not the remote-only market it is often described as.
Share your experience with using Cursor and getAIwork. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.


Cursor AI integrates advanced AI capabilities through OpenAI’s ChatGPT and Claude. This integration allows Cursor AI to offer intelligent code suggestions, automated error detection, and dynamic code optimization.
The gap between Cursor and Windsurf is narrow and closing fast. While Cursor wins for now based on slightly better overall results and stability, Windsurf's rapid development and polished experience make it a...
Cursor's tab completion is pretty wild. It'll suggest multiple lines of code, and it's looking at your whole project to make those suggestions. For TypeScript and Python files - when Tab suggests an unimported symbol,...
We have no reviews of getAIwork yet. Be the first one to post
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


TL;DR: I built a USD/MXN tip calculator with Cursor for the Build a Mini App challenge during Hacktoberfest and MLH Global Hack Week. One prompt, one commit, no corrections, and the site was live on GitHub Pages eight minutes after I... - Source: dev.to / about 23 hours ago
Quick answer: Yes — you can build with free cloud LLM APIs in 2026 without installing models on your laptop. Start with Google AI Studio (Gemini) + Groq + OpenRouter (:free models). Paste keys into Cursor BYOK or VS Code + Cline, then... - Source: dev.to / 18 days ago
Bifrost acts as both an MCP client and an MCP server in a single deployment. It connects out to your filesystem, database, search and custom API servers, discovers their tools automatically, and exposes everything back through one... - Source: dev.to / 25 days ago
Tracking getAIwork since Aug 2026.
When comparing Cursor and getAIwork, you can also consider the following products.

Transform hours of debugging into seconds with a single command. Experience coding at thought-speed with Claude's AI that understands your entire codebase—no more context switching, just breakthrough results.
Compare Claude Code to Cursor or getAIwork:

Find the best telecommuting jobs, part-time professional jobs and other flexible jobs in over 100...
Compare Flexjobs to Cursor or getAIwork:

Your AI pair programmer. With GitHub Copilot, get suggestions for whole lines or entire functions right inside your editor.
Compare GitHub Copilot to Cursor or getAIwork:

Jobicy is a career-education platform, offering remote job listings, comprehensive career advice and support to empower individuals in their remote work journey.
Compare Jobicy to Cursor or getAIwork:

Tomorrow's editor, today. Windsurf Editor is the first AI agent-powered IDE that keeps developers in the flow. Available today on Mac, Windows, and Linux.
Compare Windsurf Editor to Cursor or getAIwork:

A Modern Hiring Tool for the Entire Team. A uniquely simple, visual hiring tool you and your team will love.
Compare Breezy.hr to Cursor or getAIwork: