Software Alternatives & Startups

CrossBrowserTesting VS TestMyApps.app

Compare CrossBrowserTesting VS TestMyApps.app and see what are their differences

CrossBrowserTesting

Browser Testing made simple! Run automated, visual, and manual tests on 1500+ real browsers and mobile devices. Test more browsers, in less time.

Rating
0 reviews
TestMyApps.app

Get 12 testers for 14 days on Google Play: 14 real Android testers for 16 days, from $15 one-time, plus free community testing.

Rating
0 reviews
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, CrossBrowserTesting should be more popular than TestMyApps.app. It has been mentioned 6 times since March 2021.

social mentions
6 vs 3
Website Testing popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
173 vs 14

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

CrossBrowserTesting
TestMyApps.app
Website crossbrowsertesting.com testmyapps.app
Pricing
Listed in

About CrossBrowserTesting and TestMyApps.app

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

CrossBrowserTesting
TestMyApps.app

No description of CrossBrowserTesting yet.

TestMyApps (by ClyroLabs) helps Android developers complete Google Play closed testing so they can apply for production access. For affected personal Play Console accounts, Google expects at least 12 testers opted in to a closed test continuously for 14 days. Friends, Discord swaps, and...

Read more about TestMyApps.app

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

CrossBrowserTesting 7 features
TestMyApps.app 5 features
  • Wide Range of Browsers and Devices
    CrossBrowserTesting offers a large selection of browsers and devices, allowing developers to test their applications in various environments to ensure compatibility.
  • Live Testing
    Users can perform live interactive testing on real devices, enabling them to manually verify the behavior of their application and catch issues that automated tests might miss.
  • Automated Testing Integration
    The platform provides integration with popular testing frameworks and tools such as Selenium, Appium, and others, facilitating automated testing workflows.
  • Visual Testing
    CrossBrowserTesting offers visual testing capabilities, allowing users to compare screenshots from different browsers to identify design inconsistencies.
  • Comprehensive Reports
    Detailed test reports with screenshots and logs are generated, helping users to quickly identify and address issues found during testing.
  • Parallel Testing
    The service supports parallel testing, enabling users to run multiple tests simultaneously, significantly reducing the overall testing time.
  • Easy-to-Use Interface
    The user interface is intuitive and user-friendly, making it easy for both beginners and experienced testers to navigate and utilize the platform effectively.

Possible disadvantages

  • Cost
    CrossBrowserTesting can be expensive, especially for small teams or individual developers who might find the subscription plans to be cost-prohibitive.
  • Performance
    Tests on real devices can sometimes be slow due to the availability and network constraints, which can affect the overall efficiency of the testing process.
  • Limited Mobile Devices
    While the platform includes a variety of devices, the selection might not cover all the latest models or less common devices, potentially limiting testing coverage.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    Some advanced features and integrations might require a learning curve, which could be challenging for users who are not familiar with automated testing or the specific tools supported.
  • Test Timeout Issues
    Occasional issues with test timeouts have been reported, which can disrupt the testing process and require reruns or additional troubleshooting.
  • Automated Testing
    TestMyApps.app offers automated testing capabilities that can help developers quickly identify bugs and issues in their applications without manual intervention, saving time in the QA process.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The platform is designed with an intuitive interface that makes it accessible for both technical and non-technical users to set up and run tests.
  • Cross-Platform Support
    The tool supports testing across multiple platforms, allowing developers to ensure their apps work correctly on various devices and operating systems.
  • Time Efficiency
    By automating repetitive testing tasks, the platform helps development teams save significant time compared to manual testing methods.
  • Integration Capabilities
    TestMyApps.app can integrate with existing development workflows and CI/CD pipelines, making it easier to incorporate into established development processes.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

CrossBrowserTesting
TestMyApps.app

Overall verdict

  • CrossBrowserTesting is generally regarded as a good solution for cross-browser testing needs, particularly for teams that require real-time testing and robust automation capabilities. Its ease of use, extensive browser/device coverage, and integration options make it a strong choice for many development and QA teams.

Why this product is good

  • CrossBrowserTesting is considered a valuable tool because it provides a cloud-based platform for testing websites and mobile applications across different browsers, devices, and operating systems. It enables developers and QA teams to ensure that their applications function correctly on various platforms without needing to maintain a complex setup of physical devices. The platform offers real-time debugging, automated screenshot testing, and integration with various CI/CD tools, which streamlines the testing process.

Recommended for

    This service is highly recommended for software development teams, QA engineers, and web developers who need to ensure compatibility and functionality of their web applications across multiple browsers and devices. It is particularly useful for organizations with a focus on maintaining high-quality user experiences across various platforms.

No analysis of TestMyApps.app yet.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

CrossBrowserTesting 1 video + Add
TestMyApps.app 0 videos + Add

Cross Browser Testing Tool Comparison – LambdaTest vs. CrossBrowserTesting

No TestMyApps.app videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
CrossBrowserTesting
TestMyApps.app
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

Questions & Answers

As answered by people managing CrossBrowserTesting and TestMyApps.app.

What's the story behind your product?

TestMyApps.app's answer:

Google Play’s closed-testing rule (roughly 12 testers for 14 days) became a real bottleneck for indie apps. Recruiting and keeping people active for two weeks is hard and expensive. We built TestMyApps.app so developers can meet that window with a managed service at a predictable price — $15 / $29 — instead of weeks of outreach or agency quotes. ClyroLabs runs it with an honest brief: we help you complete the testing period; Google still owns production access.

How would you describe the primary audience of your product?

TestMyApps.app's answer:

-Indie Android developers and small studios preparing a first Play production release -Solo founders and startups who need 12×14 closed testing without building a tester network -Teams stuck after DIY Fiverr/friends testing fell short on duration or retention -Agencies who want a simple closed-testing option for client apps (1–2 apps per plan)

What makes your product unique?

TestMyApps.app's answer:

Price and scope are transparent: $15 / $29, not opaque agency retainers Focused only on Play closed testing (12×14), not a bloated “app marketing” suite Managed end-to-end: you ship the build; we handle the tester side for the window Clearer than DIY (recruit + retain testers for 14 days) and usually cheaper than custom agency work We don’t overclaim: window

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

TestMyApps.app's answer:

Web app / SaaS dashboard for onboarding and tracking Google Play Console closed-testing workflows (managed on the customer’s behalf where applicable) Email and ops tooling for tester coordination and status updates (If you want exact stack names like Next.js / Stripe / etc., tell me and I’ll swap this in.)

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

TestMyApps.app's answer:

Indie Android developers and small studios preparing a first Play production release Solo founders and startups who need 12×14 closed testing without building a tester network Teams stuck after DIY Fiverr/friends testing fell short on duration or retention Agencies who want a simple closed-testing option for client apps (1–2 apps per plan)

User comments

Share your experience with using CrossBrowserTesting and TestMyApps.app. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

CrossBrowserTesting 6 mentions
TestMyApps.app 3 mentions
  • How can I test my site on safari if I don't have a Mac ?
    Yeah I moved on pretty quick from browserstack, but it seems to be the most popular. I've tried crossbrowsertesting.com but at the moment I really like app.lambdatest.com. Source: about 4 years ago
  • great list of "cool" sites from hnews
    Https://geizhals.de/ - this is a german site but the UI is nice and you can find a lot of stuff. Https://www.gsmarena.com/search.php3? - a phone search site. When I was at https://crossbrowsertesting.com we used this site a... - Source: dev.to / over 4 years ago
  • Learn How To Create, Test and Deploy a Single Page App with Vue 3 + Vite and Pinia
    Fortunately we don’t need to install, nor configure, any other tools, unless maybe some fancy reporters, but for now we can get everything we need in terms of end-to-end automated testing out of Nightwatch. Besides Chrome, Nightwatch has... - Source: dev.to / over 4 years ago

View more

  • Why Some of My Google Play Closed Testers Didn't Count (and How I Check Every Opt-In Before Day 1)
    All of this assumes you have people to audit. If finding them is where you're stuck, we run Google Play closed testing at TestMyApps: 14 testers for 16 days, which gives some room above Google's minimum, and testers join within 6 hours.... - Source: dev.to / about 6 hours ago
  • What I Fix in My Android Build Before Starting a 14-Day Google Play Closed Test
    The preflight gets your build ready. It doesn't give you Android app testers. If you're still working out how to get 12 testers for 14 days, TestMyApps runs 14 testers on real Android phones for 16 days, from $15, with testers joining... - Source: dev.to / 3 days ago
  • What Android App Testers Actually See in a Google Play Closed Test
    The message fixes confusion. It doesn't fix headcount. If how to get 12 testers for 14 days is the part you're stuck on, that's what we built TestMyApps for. - Source: dev.to / 10 days ago

Alternatives to CrossBrowserTesting and TestMyApps.app

When comparing CrossBrowserTesting and TestMyApps.app, you can also consider the following products.