CrossBrowserTesting VS Quickly

• Wide Range of Browsers and Devices
  CrossBrowserTesting offers a large selection of browsers and devices, allowing developers to test their applications in various environments to ensure compatibility.
• Live Testing
  Users can perform live interactive testing on real devices, enabling them to manually verify the behavior of their application and catch issues that automated tests might miss.
• Automated Testing Integration
  The platform provides integration with popular testing frameworks and tools such as Selenium, Appium, and others, facilitating automated testing workflows.
• Visual Testing
  CrossBrowserTesting offers visual testing capabilities, allowing users to compare screenshots from different browsers to identify design inconsistencies.
• Comprehensive Reports
  Detailed test reports with screenshots and logs are generated, helping users to quickly identify and address issues found during testing.
• Parallel Testing
  The service supports parallel testing, enabling users to run multiple tests simultaneously, significantly reducing the overall testing time.
• Easy-to-Use Interface
  The user interface is intuitive and user-friendly, making it easy for both beginners and experienced testers to navigate and utilize the platform effectively.

Possible disadvantages

• Cost
  CrossBrowserTesting can be expensive, especially for small teams or individual developers who might find the subscription plans to be cost-prohibitive.
• Performance
  Tests on real devices can sometimes be slow due to the availability and network constraints, which can affect the overall efficiency of the testing process.
• Limited Mobile Devices
  While the platform includes a variety of devices, the selection might not cover all the latest models or less common devices, potentially limiting testing coverage.
• Learning Curve for Advanced Features
  Some advanced features and integrations might require a learning curve, which could be challenging for users who are not familiar with automated testing or the specific tools supported.
• Test Timeout Issues
  Occasional issues with test timeouts have been reported, which can disrupt the testing process and require reruns or additional troubleshooting.

• Speed of Development
  Quickly is designed to help users build and launch websites or web applications rapidly, significantly reducing the time from concept to deployment compared to traditional development approaches.
• No-Code/Low-Code Approach
  The platform enables users without extensive programming knowledge to create functional web projects, making web development accessible to entrepreneurs, marketers, and non-technical founders.
• Simplified Workflow
  Quickly streamlines the development process by providing intuitive tools and templates that reduce complexity, allowing users to focus on their business logic rather than technical infrastructure.
• Cost-Effective
  By reducing the need for hiring dedicated developers or development agencies, Quickly can help startups and small businesses save significant costs on building their digital products.
• All-in-One Platform
  Quickly aims to consolidate multiple tools and services into a single platform, reducing the need to juggle between different services for hosting, design, and deployment.

Possible disadvantages

• Limited Customization
  As with many no-code/low-code platforms, Quickly may have limitations in terms of deep customization, making it challenging to implement highly unique or complex features that fall outside its built-in capabilities.
• Platform Dependency
  Users building on Quickly become dependent on the platform's continued existence and pricing model, which creates vendor lock-in risk if the company changes direction or shuts down.
• Scalability Concerns
  Projects built on Quickly may face scalability challenges as they grow, potentially requiring migration to custom-built solutions when the application outgrows the platform's capabilities.
• Limited Community and Ecosystem
  Being a relatively niche product, Quickly may have a smaller community compared to established platforms, meaning fewer third-party resources, tutorials, and community support are available.
• Learning Curve for Platform-Specific Features
  While designed to be simple, users still need to learn Quickly's specific interface, conventions, and limitations, which represents a time investment that doesn't transfer to other development tools.

Cross Browser Testing Tool Comparison – LambdaTest vs. CrossBrowserTesting

No Quickly videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

• How can I test my site on safari if I don't have a Mac ?

  Yeah I moved on pretty quick from browserstack, but it seems to be the most popular. I've tried crossbrowsertesting.com but at the moment I really like app.lambdatest.com. Source: about 4 years ago

• great list of "cool" sites from hnews

  Https://geizhals.de/ - this is a german site but the UI is nice and you can find a lot of stuff. Https://www.gsmarena.com/search.php3? - a phone search site. When I was at https://crossbrowsertesting.com we used this site a... - Source: dev.to / over 4 years ago

• Learn How To Create, Test and Deploy a Single Page App with Vue 3 + Vite and Pinia

  Fortunately we don’t need to install, nor configure, any other tools, unless maybe some fancy reporters, but for now we can get everything we need in terms of end-to-end automated testing out of Nightwatch. Besides Chrome, Nightwatch has... - Source: dev.to / over 4 years ago

View more

Tracking Quickly since Jul 2025.