Leader in data privacy software to automate privacy compliance requirements. Our team of privacy experts provide enterprise grade solutions at a mid-market price with white glove service to help with complex privacy requirements.
sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Which is more popular?
Based on our record, CrossBrowserTesting
should be more popular than Keycloak.
It has been mentioned 6 times since March 2021.
social mentions
6 vs 4
Website Testing popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
175 vs 193
Base details
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
Wide Range of Browsers and Devices CrossBrowserTesting offers a large selection of browsers and devices, allowing developers to test their applications in various environments to ensure compatibility.
Live Testing Users can perform live interactive testing on real devices, enabling them to manually verify the behavior of their application and catch issues that automated tests might miss.
Automated Testing Integration The platform provides integration with popular testing frameworks and tools such as Selenium, Appium, and others, facilitating automated testing workflows.
Visual Testing CrossBrowserTesting offers visual testing capabilities, allowing users to compare screenshots from different browsers to identify design inconsistencies.
Comprehensive Reports Detailed test reports with screenshots and logs are generated, helping users to quickly identify and address issues found during testing.
Parallel Testing The service supports parallel testing, enabling users to run multiple tests simultaneously, significantly reducing the overall testing time.
Easy-to-Use Interface The user interface is intuitive and user-friendly, making it easy for both beginners and experienced testers to navigate and utilize the platform effectively.
Possible disadvantages
Cost CrossBrowserTesting can be expensive, especially for small teams or individual developers who might find the subscription plans to be cost-prohibitive.
Performance Tests on real devices can sometimes be slow due to the availability and network constraints, which can affect the overall efficiency of the testing process.
Limited Mobile Devices While the platform includes a variety of devices, the selection might not cover all the latest models or less common devices, potentially limiting testing coverage.
Learning Curve for Advanced Features Some advanced features and integrations might require a learning curve, which could be challenging for users who are not familiar with automated testing or the specific tools supported.
Test Timeout Issues Occasional issues with test timeouts have been reported, which can disrupt the testing process and require reruns or additional troubleshooting.
Open-Source Keycloak is an open-source identity and access management solution, which means it is free to use and has a community-driven support system. This can lead to lower costs and more flexibility compared to proprietary solutions.
Feature-Rich Keycloak offers a comprehensive set of features including single sign-on (SSO), multi-factor authentication (MFA), user federation, identity brokering, and social login. This makes it suitable for a wide range of use cases.
Customizability With Keycloak, you can customize the authentication and authorization processes through its extensible architecture, allowing for the addition of custom features and integrations.
Integration Capability Keycloak supports integration with various protocols such as OAuth 2.0, OpenID Connect, and SAML, making it versatile for integrating with different platforms and services.
Active Community Keycloak has an active and growing community of developers and users who contribute to its improvement and provide support, resources, and shared knowledge.
Possible disadvantages
Complexity Keycloak can be complex to set up and configure, especially for users who are not familiar with identity and access management concepts. This may require additional time and expertise.
Resource-Intensive Running Keycloak can be resource-intensive, requiring more CPU and memory compared to simpler authentication solutions. This may necessitate higher infrastructure costs.
Learning Curve The learning curve for Keycloak can be steep for new users due to its wide range of features and configuration options. Ample time might be required to fully understand and utilize its capabilities.
Documentation Quality While Keycloak has extensive documentation, some users find it to be insufficiently detailed or difficult to navigate, which can impede the setup and troubleshooting process.
Maintenance Operating a Keycloak instance involves ongoing maintenance tasks such as updates, security patches, and backups, which can be time-consuming and require dedicated resources.
Analysis
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.
CrossBrowserTestingKeycloak
Overall verdict
CrossBrowserTesting is generally regarded as a good solution for cross-browser testing needs, particularly for teams that require real-time testing and robust automation capabilities. Its ease of use, extensive browser/device coverage, and integration options make it a strong choice for many development and QA teams.
Why this product is good
CrossBrowserTesting is considered a valuable tool because it provides a cloud-based platform for testing websites and mobile applications across different browsers, devices, and operating systems. It enables developers and QA teams to ensure that their applications function correctly on various platforms without needing to maintain a complex setup of physical devices. The platform offers real-time debugging, automated screenshot testing, and integration with various CI/CD tools, which streamlines the testing process.
Recommended for
This service is highly recommended for software development teams, QA engineers, and web developers who need to ensure compatibility and functionality of their web applications across multiple browsers and devices. It is particularly useful for organizations with a focus on maintaining high-quality user experiences across various platforms.
Overall verdict
Overall, Keycloak is widely regarded as a good choice for organizations looking for a comprehensive and flexible identity management solution. It is especially praised in environments where open-source software is preferred or where customization and scalability are important.
Why this product is good
Keycloak is considered a robust open-source identity and access management solution that provides features like single sign-on (SSO), user federation, identity brokering, and social login. It is designed to secure applications and services with minimum effort and supports various standard protocols, such as OAuth 2.0, OpenID Connect, and SAML 2.0. It also offers a customizable interface and extensive integration capabilities, making it a versatile choice across different industries.
Recommended for
Organizations in need of a scalable identity and access management solution
Developers seeking an open-source, customizable platform
Businesses looking to implement SSO and secure applications quickly
Enterprises requiring integration with various identity providers and social media networks
Teams preferring a solution that supports industry-standard authentication protocols
You can integrate Keycloak with your applications to have a single-sign-in and single-sign-out experience. Moreover, one can activate social logins without any modification in code. Additionally, it allows user...
Keycloak may be quite beneficial because it provides a built-in method for syncing with databases, such as LDAP or Active Directory, when your users already are registered on. If you use Social Login for social...
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.
CrossBrowserTesting6 mentionsKeycloak4 mentions
How can I test my site on safari if I don't have a Mac ?
Yeah I moved on pretty quick from browserstack, but it seems to be the most popular. I've tried crossbrowsertesting.com but at the moment I really like app.lambdatest.com.
Source:
about 4 years ago
great list of "cool" sites from hnews
Https://geizhals.de/ - this is a german site but the UI is nice and you can find a lot of stuff.
Https://www.gsmarena.com/search.php3? - a phone search site. When I was at https://crossbrowsertesting.com we used this site a...
- Source: dev.to
/
over 4 years ago
Fortunately we don’t need to install, nor configure, any other tools, unless maybe some fancy reporters, but for now we can get everything we need in terms of end-to-end automated testing out of Nightwatch. Besides Chrome, Nightwatch has...
- Source: dev.to
/
almost 5 years ago
Most of the time nowadays, I prefer offloading this to an identity provider, using OpenID Connect or soon Federated Credential Management (FedCM), even if that means shipping an identity provider as part of the deliverables (I generally...
- Source: dev.to
/
almost 3 years ago
Okta Says Hackers Stole Data for All Customer Support Users
Yet another breach of Okta... Why are companies not running something like keycloak [1] themselves? Are administrative/maintenance costs too high or is it plausible deniability? [1] https://keycloak.org.
- Source: Hacker News
/
almost 3 years ago
I built a ready-to-use auth server with TypeScript and Express.js
I'd stick with a solution like https://keycloak.org in that instance.
Source:
over 3 years ago
BrowserStack
Sauce Labs
browserling
TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)
Browsershots
Litmus
MultiBrowser
Auth0
OneLogin
Okta
AuthAnvil
TeamPassword
WebTitan
Teramind
