Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

CrossBrowserTesting VS FixMyWeb.dev

Compare CrossBrowserTesting VS FixMyWeb.dev and see what are their differences

CrossBrowserTesting

Browser Testing made simple! Run automated, visual, and manual tests on 1500+ real browsers and mobile devices. Test more browsers, in less time.

Rating
0 reviews
Promote on VibeVoted
Alternatives Is it good?
FixMyWeb.dev

Accessibility scanner for EU EAA + WCAG 2.2

Rating
0 reviews
Promote on VibeVoted
Alternatives Is it good?
HTMLCSS to Image API
Capture website screenshots, render HTML/CSS, or create templated graphics. Render images or PDFs. Use MCP with AI, no-code automation, or the REST API. No browsers needed. sponsored

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, CrossBrowserTesting should be more popular than FixMyWeb.dev. It has been mentioned 6 times since March 2021.

social mentions
6 vs 4
Website Testing popularity
98% vs 2%
alternatives listed
175 vs 19

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

CrossBrowserTesting
FixMyWeb.dev
Website crossbrowsertesting.com fixmyweb.dev
Pricing
Official pricing
Official pricing
Listed in
Browser Testing Website Testing Automated Testing Software Testing +1
Web Accessibility User Experience Web Development Tools Website Testing +1

About CrossBrowserTesting and FixMyWeb.dev

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

CrossBrowserTesting
FixMyWeb.dev

No description of CrossBrowserTesting yet.

Automated accessibility scanner covering the EU Accessibility Act (EAA) and WCAG 2.2. Runs 201 checks across 4 WCAG principles (Perceivable, Operable, Understandable, Robust). A free scan returns a score out of 100, issues grouped by severity, a PDF report and an embeddable accessibility badge....

Read more about FixMyWeb.dev

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

CrossBrowserTesting 7 features
FixMyWeb.dev 5 features
  • Wide Range of Browsers and Devices
    CrossBrowserTesting offers a large selection of browsers and devices, allowing developers to test their applications in various environments to ensure compatibility.
  • Live Testing
    Users can perform live interactive testing on real devices, enabling them to manually verify the behavior of their application and catch issues that automated tests might miss.
  • Automated Testing Integration
    The platform provides integration with popular testing frameworks and tools such as Selenium, Appium, and others, facilitating automated testing workflows.
  • Visual Testing
    CrossBrowserTesting offers visual testing capabilities, allowing users to compare screenshots from different browsers to identify design inconsistencies.
  • Comprehensive Reports
    Detailed test reports with screenshots and logs are generated, helping users to quickly identify and address issues found during testing.
  • Parallel Testing
    The service supports parallel testing, enabling users to run multiple tests simultaneously, significantly reducing the overall testing time.
  • Easy-to-Use Interface
    The user interface is intuitive and user-friendly, making it easy for both beginners and experienced testers to navigate and utilize the platform effectively.

Possible disadvantages

  • Cost
    CrossBrowserTesting can be expensive, especially for small teams or individual developers who might find the subscription plans to be cost-prohibitive.
  • Performance
    Tests on real devices can sometimes be slow due to the availability and network constraints, which can affect the overall efficiency of the testing process.
  • Limited Mobile Devices
    While the platform includes a variety of devices, the selection might not cover all the latest models or less common devices, potentially limiting testing coverage.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    Some advanced features and integrations might require a learning curve, which could be challenging for users who are not familiar with automated testing or the specific tools supported.
  • Test Timeout Issues
    Occasional issues with test timeouts have been reported, which can disrupt the testing process and require reruns or additional troubleshooting.
  • 201 WCAG 2.2 Checks
    All 4 principles (Perceivable, Operable, Understandable, Robust)
  • EU EAA Coverage
    Covers the European Accessibility Act and EN 301 549
  • PDF Audit Report
    Remediation code snippets per violation
  • 6 Languages UI
    EN, ES, FR, DE, PT-BR, JA
  • Free Tier
    3 scans/month, no credit card required

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

CrossBrowserTesting
FixMyWeb.dev

Overall verdict

  • CrossBrowserTesting is generally regarded as a good solution for cross-browser testing needs, particularly for teams that require real-time testing and robust automation capabilities. Its ease of use, extensive browser/device coverage, and integration options make it a strong choice for many development and QA teams.

Why this product is good

  • CrossBrowserTesting is considered a valuable tool because it provides a cloud-based platform for testing websites and mobile applications across different browsers, devices, and operating systems. It enables developers and QA teams to ensure that their applications function correctly on various platforms without needing to maintain a complex setup of physical devices. The platform offers real-time debugging, automated screenshot testing, and integration with various CI/CD tools, which streamlines the testing process.

Recommended for

    This service is highly recommended for software development teams, QA engineers, and web developers who need to ensure compatibility and functionality of their web applications across multiple browsers and devices. It is particularly useful for organizations with a focus on maintaining high-quality user experiences across various platforms.

Overall verdict

  • I don't have verified information about FixMyWeb.dev in my knowledge base, so I can't confirm its quality, features, pricing, or reputation. I'd be fabricating details if I described specific pros or cons.

Why this product is good

  • I have no reliable data on this specific domain/service to evaluate its claims
  • No verifiable user reviews, ratings, or independent reports are available to me for this product
  • Without confirmed information, any 'why' points would be speculative and potentially misleading

Recommended for

  • Before relying on this service, check its official website for details on features, pricing, and support
  • Look for independent reviews on trusted platforms like Trustpilot, G2, or Reddit
  • Verify company legitimacy via domain age, business registration, or LinkedIn presence
  • Consider reaching out directly to request references or case studies
  • Test with a small project first if possible before committing fully

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

CrossBrowserTesting 1 video + Add
FixMyWeb.dev 0 videos + Add

Cross Browser Testing Tool Comparison – LambdaTest vs. CrossBrowserTesting

No FixMyWeb.dev videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
CrossBrowserTesting
FixMyWeb.dev
98% 98%
Website Testing
2% 2%
0% 0%
Web Accessibility
100% 100%
100% 100%
Browser Testing
0% 0%
0% 0%
Accessibility Testing
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using CrossBrowserTesting and FixMyWeb.dev. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

CrossBrowserTesting 6 mentions
FixMyWeb.dev 4 mentions
  • How can I test my site on safari if I don't have a Mac ?
    Yeah I moved on pretty quick from browserstack, but it seems to be the most popular. I've tried crossbrowsertesting.com but at the moment I really like app.lambdatest.com. Source: about 4 years ago
  • great list of "cool" sites from hnews
    Https://geizhals.de/ - this is a german site but the UI is nice and you can find a lot of stuff. Https://www.gsmarena.com/search.php3? - a phone search site. When I was at https://crossbrowsertesting.com we used this site a... - Source: dev.to / over 4 years ago
  • Learn How To Create, Test and Deploy a Single Page App with Vue 3 + Vite and Pinia
    Fortunately we don’t need to install, nor configure, any other tools, unless maybe some fancy reporters, but for now we can get everything we need in terms of end-to-end automated testing out of Nightwatch. Besides Chrome, Nightwatch has... - Source: dev.to / almost 5 years ago

View more

  • Keyboard Navigation Testing: A Developer Complete Guide to WCAG Operability
    Automated scanners can catch about 40% of keyboard accessibility issues — primarily missing tabindex, incorrect roles, and missing focus styles. Tools like AccessiScan provide a starting point with 201 automated checks, but the... - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • How to Pass the EAA 2025 Accessibility Audit — A Step-by-Step WCAG Checklist
    This guide is the practical checklist I wish I had when I built FixMyWeb — a free WCAG scanner I now use myself to keep our own pages clean. Run through it once, and you will know exactly which 20% of changes get you to 80% conformance. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • Color Contrast Failures: The Number One Accessibility Issue and How to Fix It
    Checking contrast manually across every combination of text and background in your app is impractical. Automated tools like AccessiScan scan your entire page across 201 WCAG 2.2 checks — including contrast — and generate a prioritised... - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago

View more

Alternatives to CrossBrowserTesting and FixMyWeb.dev

When comparing CrossBrowserTesting and FixMyWeb.dev, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...