Software Alternatives & Startups

CrossBrowserTesting VS Cursion

Compare CrossBrowserTesting VS Cursion and see what are their differences

CrossBrowserTesting

Browser Testing made simple! Run automated, visual, and manual tests on 1500+ real browsers and mobile devices. Test more browsers, in less time.

CrossBrowserTesting Landing page
Rating
0 reviews
Cursion

The Ultimate Regression Testing Platform. Never deploy without it. Track, Test, and Identify exactly what's plaguing site performance.

Cursion LANDING
Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Freemium $0.1 (Per extra task (Test, CaseRun, Scan etc))
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, CrossBrowserTesting seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 6 times since March 2021.

social mentions
6 vs 0
Website Testing popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
182 vs 5

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

CrossBrowserTesting
Cursion
Website crossbrowsertesting.com cursion.dev
Pricing
Freemium $0.1 (Per extra task (Test, CaseRun, Scan etc)) Official pricing
Platforms
Web
Company 2023
Listed in

About CrossBrowserTesting and Cursion

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

CrossBrowserTesting
Cursion

No description of CrossBrowserTesting yet.

We began working on Cursion to help our fellow developers understand how their sites and web apps change after deployments. The platform specifically aims to discover the small differences a human might otherwise miss by painstakingly comparing Megabytes of data collected on each site. Notable...

Read more about Cursion

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

CrossBrowserTesting 7 features
Cursion 5 features
  • Wide Range of Browsers and Devices
    CrossBrowserTesting offers a large selection of browsers and devices, allowing developers to test their applications in various environments to ensure compatibility.
  • Live Testing
    Users can perform live interactive testing on real devices, enabling them to manually verify the behavior of their application and catch issues that automated tests might miss.
  • Automated Testing Integration
    The platform provides integration with popular testing frameworks and tools such as Selenium, Appium, and others, facilitating automated testing workflows.
  • Visual Testing
    CrossBrowserTesting offers visual testing capabilities, allowing users to compare screenshots from different browsers to identify design inconsistencies.
  • Comprehensive Reports
    Detailed test reports with screenshots and logs are generated, helping users to quickly identify and address issues found during testing.
  • Parallel Testing
    The service supports parallel testing, enabling users to run multiple tests simultaneously, significantly reducing the overall testing time.
  • Easy-to-Use Interface
    The user interface is intuitive and user-friendly, making it easy for both beginners and experienced testers to navigate and utilize the platform effectively.

Possible disadvantages

  • Cost
    CrossBrowserTesting can be expensive, especially for small teams or individual developers who might find the subscription plans to be cost-prohibitive.
  • Performance
    Tests on real devices can sometimes be slow due to the availability and network constraints, which can affect the overall efficiency of the testing process.
  • Limited Mobile Devices
    While the platform includes a variety of devices, the selection might not cover all the latest models or less common devices, potentially limiting testing coverage.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    Some advanced features and integrations might require a learning curve, which could be challenging for users who are not familiar with automated testing or the specific tools supported.
  • Test Timeout Issues
    Occasional issues with test timeouts have been reported, which can disrupt the testing process and require reruns or additional troubleshooting.
  • Web Metrics
  • Visual Regression Testing
  • Unit Testing
  • Open API
  • Integrations

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

CrossBrowserTesting
Cursion

Overall verdict

  • CrossBrowserTesting is generally regarded as a good solution for cross-browser testing needs, particularly for teams that require real-time testing and robust automation capabilities. Its ease of use, extensive browser/device coverage, and integration options make it a strong choice for many development and QA teams.

Why this product is good

  • CrossBrowserTesting is considered a valuable tool because it provides a cloud-based platform for testing websites and mobile applications across different browsers, devices, and operating systems. It enables developers and QA teams to ensure that their applications function correctly on various platforms without needing to maintain a complex setup of physical devices. The platform offers real-time debugging, automated screenshot testing, and integration with various CI/CD tools, which streamlines the testing process.

Recommended for

    This service is highly recommended for software development teams, QA engineers, and web developers who need to ensure compatibility and functionality of their web applications across multiple browsers and devices. It is particularly useful for organizations with a focus on maintaining high-quality user experiences across various platforms.

No analysis of Cursion yet.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

CrossBrowserTesting 1 video + Add
Cursion 1 video + Add

Cross Browser Testing Tool Comparison – LambdaTest vs. CrossBrowserTesting

Scanerr Showcase

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
CrossBrowserTesting
Cursion
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

Questions & Answers

As answered by people managing CrossBrowserTesting and Cursion.

Who are some of the biggest customers of your product?

Cursion's answer:

  • Digital Ocean, Inc
  • Clerky, Inc
  • Mindgruve Holdings, Inc
  • Swade Technologies, Inc
  • Stache Spaces, Inc
  • Smart Innovation

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

Cursion's answer:

  • Python
  • JavaScript
  • Django
  • React

What's the story behind your product?

Cursion's answer:

Scanerr began like so many other software tools, the founder solving their own problems.

The first iteration of Scanerr was a simple Python script used to ensure the founder's websites didn't break after updates.

Not long after, a few companies reached out and wanted to use the technology for their own processes - and Scanerr was born!

How would you describe the primary audience of your product?

Cursion's answer:

We're fortunate to serve companies of all sizes. From the enterprise to the startup, Scanerr is constantly helping developers and teams uncover bugs, bottlenecks, and breaking changes to their web apps.

Most of our customers are from the web development, hosting, and digital marketing industries.

What makes your product unique?

Cursion's answer:

Scanerr provides a comprehensive assessment of your website by collecting and analyzing the Page Source, Console Errors/Warnings, Screenshots, and over 70 Performance Metrics. Scanerr also uses an Advanced, Proprietary Algorithm for detecting visual changes on a website in real-time.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

Cursion's answer:

Unlike its competitors, Scanerr performs Regression Testing by comparing more than just screenshots. By combining our Advanced, Proprietary Visual Regression Algorithm, and over 70 Performance Metrics with Browser data - Scanerr provides a holistic assessment of your site's health and stability.

User comments

Share your experience with using CrossBrowserTesting and Cursion. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

CrossBrowserTesting 6 mentions
Cursion 0 mentions
  • How can I test my site on safari if I don't have a Mac ?
    Yeah I moved on pretty quick from browserstack, but it seems to be the most popular. I've tried crossbrowsertesting.com but at the moment I really like app.lambdatest.com. Source: almost 4 years ago
  • great list of "cool" sites from hnews
    Https://geizhals.de/ - this is a german site but the UI is nice and you can find a lot of stuff. Https://www.gsmarena.com/search.php3? - a phone search site. When I was at https://crossbrowsertesting.com we used this site a... - Source: dev.to / about 4 years ago
  • Learn How To Create, Test and Deploy a Single Page App with Vue 3 + Vite and Pinia
    Fortunately we don’t need to install, nor configure, any other tools, unless maybe some fancy reporters, but for now we can get everything we need in terms of end-to-end automated testing out of Nightwatch. Besides Chrome, Nightwatch has... - Source: dev.to / over 4 years ago

View more

Tracking Cursion since Mar 2023.

Alternatives to CrossBrowserTesting and Cursion

When comparing CrossBrowserTesting and Cursion, you can also consider the following products.