CrossBrowserTesting VS Construct 2

• Wide Range of Browsers and Devices
  CrossBrowserTesting offers a large selection of browsers and devices, allowing developers to test their applications in various environments to ensure compatibility.
• Live Testing
  Users can perform live interactive testing on real devices, enabling them to manually verify the behavior of their application and catch issues that automated tests might miss.
• Automated Testing Integration
  The platform provides integration with popular testing frameworks and tools such as Selenium, Appium, and others, facilitating automated testing workflows.
• Visual Testing
  CrossBrowserTesting offers visual testing capabilities, allowing users to compare screenshots from different browsers to identify design inconsistencies.
• Comprehensive Reports
  Detailed test reports with screenshots and logs are generated, helping users to quickly identify and address issues found during testing.
• Parallel Testing
  The service supports parallel testing, enabling users to run multiple tests simultaneously, significantly reducing the overall testing time.
• Easy-to-Use Interface
  The user interface is intuitive and user-friendly, making it easy for both beginners and experienced testers to navigate and utilize the platform effectively.

Possible disadvantages

• Cost
  CrossBrowserTesting can be expensive, especially for small teams or individual developers who might find the subscription plans to be cost-prohibitive.
• Performance
  Tests on real devices can sometimes be slow due to the availability and network constraints, which can affect the overall efficiency of the testing process.
• Limited Mobile Devices
  While the platform includes a variety of devices, the selection might not cover all the latest models or less common devices, potentially limiting testing coverage.
• Learning Curve for Advanced Features
  Some advanced features and integrations might require a learning curve, which could be challenging for users who are not familiar with automated testing or the specific tools supported.
• Test Timeout Issues
  Occasional issues with test timeouts have been reported, which can disrupt the testing process and require reruns or additional troubleshooting.

• User-Friendly Interface
  Construct 2 offers a drag-and-drop interface, making it accessible for users without programming skills to create games.
• Fast Prototyping
  The visual scripting system allows for quick iteration and experimentation, enabling rapid development and testing of game concepts.
• Cross-Platform Export
  Games developed in Construct 2 can be exported to multiple platforms including HTML5, Android, iOS, Windows, and more.
• Extensive Documentation and Community Support
  Construct 2 has comprehensive documentation and an active community, which provides tutorials, forums, and asset stores that help in learning and improving game development skills.
• Performance Optimization
  Construct 2 is built to optimize the performance of games running on various devices, ensuring smoother gameplay experience.

Possible disadvantages

• Limited 3D Support
  Construct 2 is primarily a 2D game engine and lacks the capability to handle 3D game development efficiently.
• Licensing Cost
  While there is a free version, more advanced features and export options require purchasing a license, which can be costly for some users.
• Performance Overhead
  Games built with Construct 2 can have performance overhead compared to those developed with native code, which can affect the performance on less powerful devices.
• Limited Customization
  While the visual scripting language is powerful, it can be restrictive for advanced users who need more control and customization over their game logic and performance.
• Dependency on HTML5
  Construct 2’s primary export format is HTML5, which may not be suitable for all types of games, particularly those that require high-performance or native features.
• Secondary Focus on Newer Engine
  Construct 2 is not the latest engine from Scirra; Construct 3 is its successor. Newer updates and features are likely to prioritize Construct 3, potentially slowing down the development and support for Construct 2.

No analysis of Construct 2 yet.

Cross Browser Testing Tool Comparison – LambdaTest vs. CrossBrowserTesting

Construct 2 - How To Make a Game - Review

More videos

We have no reviews of CrossBrowserTesting yet. Be the first one to post

• The Top 10 Video Game Engines
  www.gamedesigning.org · Sep 2020

  What better than an HTML-based engine to wrap up the list? Construct 2 doesn’t hinge on your ability to code. Sign me up!

• The Best 15 Mobile Game Engines / Development Platforms & Tools in 2020
  thetool.io · Apr 2018

  Construct 2 is a HTML5 platform for creating 2D games. It is very easy to use as coding is not required and it has many features that will help you in developing visually appealing games in a short time. It also...

• How can I test my site on safari if I don't have a Mac ?

  Yeah I moved on pretty quick from browserstack, but it seems to be the most popular. I've tried crossbrowsertesting.com but at the moment I really like app.lambdatest.com. Source: about 4 years ago

• great list of "cool" sites from hnews

  Https://geizhals.de/ - this is a german site but the UI is nice and you can find a lot of stuff. Https://www.gsmarena.com/search.php3? - a phone search site. When I was at https://crossbrowsertesting.com we used this site a... - Source: dev.to / over 4 years ago

• Learn How To Create, Test and Deploy a Single Page App with Vue 3 + Vite and Pinia

  Fortunately we don’t need to install, nor configure, any other tools, unless maybe some fancy reporters, but for now we can get everything we need in terms of end-to-end automated testing out of Nightwatch. Besides Chrome, Nightwatch has... - Source: dev.to / over 4 years ago

View more

Tracking Construct 2 since Mar 2021.