Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

CrateDB VS Google Cloud Datastore

Compare CrateDB VS Google Cloud Datastore and see what are their differences

CrateDB logo CrateDB

The Hyper-Fast Database that Truly Scales

Google Cloud Datastore logo Google Cloud Datastore

Cloud Datastore is a NoSQL database for your web and mobile applications.
  • CrateDB Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-28

Store any type of data and combine the simplicity of SQL with the scalability of NoSQL. CrateDB is an open source distributed database running queries in milliseconds, whatever the complexity, volume and velocity of data.

  • Google Cloud Datastore Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-12

CrateDB features and specs

  • Scalability
    CrateDB is designed to handle large volumes of data and can easily scale horizontally by adding more nodes to a cluster, which helps in achieving high availability and load distribution.
  • Real-time SQL Queries
    It supports real-time SQL queries on structured and unstructured data, allowing users to perform powerful analytics with familiar SQL syntax.
  • Ease of Use
    CrateDB provides an approachable interface for developers and data scientists, combining NoSQL and SQL benefits, including full-text search and time series data handling.
  • Distributed Architecture
    Its distributed architecture ensures high fault tolerance and resilience, as data is replicated across nodes.
  • Dynamic Schema
    The support for dynamic schema makes it easier for applications to evolve without the need for expensive schema migrations.

Possible disadvantages of CrateDB

  • Limited Ecosystem
    Compared to more established databases like PostgreSQL or MySQL, CrateDB has a smaller ecosystem of third-party tools and community support.
  • Complexity of Management
    Managing a distributed database system like CrateDB can be complex, requiring a good understanding of its architecture and deployment processes.
  • Memory Usage
    CrateDB can be memory-intensive, especially under high load or with complex queries, potentially necessitating significant hardware resources.
  • Maturity
    As a relatively newer database technology, CrateDB might lack some of the maturity and battle-tested features found in older, more established databases.
  • Advanced Features
    While CrateDB covers many use cases well, certain advanced database features present in specialized databases might be less optimized or absent.

Google Cloud Datastore features and specs

  • Scalability
    Google Cloud Datastore can automatically scale to handle large amounts of data and high read/write loads, making it suitable for applications with growing data needs.
  • Fully Managed
    As a fully managed service, Google Cloud Datastore eliminates the need for managing servers, software patches, and replication, allowing developers to focus on building applications.
  • High Availability
    Datastore provides strong consistency for reads and writes and is designed to maintain availability even in case of entire data center outages.
  • Flexible Data Model
    The schemaless nature of Datastore allows for a flexible data model that can easily adapt to changes in application requirements.
  • Integration with Google Cloud Platform
    Datastore seamlessly integrates with other Google Cloud Platform services, which simplifies the process of building end-to-end solutions.

Possible disadvantages of Google Cloud Datastore

  • Complex Query Language
    Datastore Query Language (GQL) can be less intuitive compared to SQL, which may pose a learning curve for developers accustomed to traditional relational databases.
  • Eventual Consistency for Queries
    While Datastore offers strong consistency for entity lookups by key, queries must be specifically configured for strong consistency, otherwise they might return eventually consistent data.
  • Cost
    As usage scales, costs can increase, particularly for applications with high write loads or those requiring many transactional operations, which might be a consideration for budget-conscious projects.
  • Limited Relational Capabilities
    Datastore is a NoSQL database, which means it lacks some of the relational features like joins and complex transactions that developers might expect from a SQL database.
  • Index Management
    Managing indexes can become complex, as every query in Datastore requires a corresponding index, and poorly planned indexes can lead to increased storage costs and slower query performance.

CrateDB videos

CrateDB is the ideal database for IoT solutions

More videos:

  • Review - Getting started with CrateDB Cloud on Azure

Google Cloud Datastore videos

No Google Cloud Datastore videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to CrateDB and Google Cloud Datastore)
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Databases
17 17%
83% 83
Tech
100 100%
0% 0
Network & Admin
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using CrateDB and Google Cloud Datastore. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Google Cloud Datastore should be more popular than CrateDB. It has been mentiond 7 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

CrateDB mentions (1)

  • Build a data ingestion pipeline using Kafka, Flink, and CrateDB
    Kafka is the front line of the stack, used to queue messages received from (for example) IoT sensors and devices. CrateDB will query and store the data. And between CrateDB and Kafka, it lives Apache Flink, a data processing engine. These three tools are all distributed systems that provide elastic scaling, fault tolerance, high-throughput, and low-latency performance via parallel processing. - Source: dev.to / over 4 years ago

Google Cloud Datastore mentions (7)

  • Using Google Cloud Firestore with Django's ORM
    A long time ago, a fork of Django called โ€œDjango-nonrelโ€ experimented with the idea of using Djangoโ€™s ORM with a non-relational database; what was then called the App Engine Datastore, but is now known as Google Cloud Datastore (or technically, Google Cloud Firestore in Datastore Mode). Since then a more recent project called "django-gcloud-connectors" has been developed by Potato to allow seamless ORM integration... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • How to deploy flask app with sqlite on google cloud ?
    In that case use Cloud Datastore (aka Firestore in Datastore Mode). It's a NoSQL db that was initially targeted just for GAE (you needed to have a GAE App even if empty to use it) but that requirement has been relaxed. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Is Cloud Run a good choice for a portfolio website?
    As u/SierraBravoLima said - If you don't really need containerization, you can go with Google App Engine (Standard). If you need to store data, GAE will work with cloud datastore which has a large enough free tier. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Help! Difference between native and datastore
    Datastore mode had its start in App Engine's early days (launched in 2008), where its Datastore was the original scalable NoSQL database provided for all App Engine apps. In 2013, Datastore was made available all developers outside of App Engine, and "re-launched" as Cloud Datastore. In 2014, Google acquired Firebase for its RTDB (real-time database). Both teams worked together for the next 4 years, and in 2017,... Source: over 3 years ago
  • I'm a dev ID 10 T please help me
    Database: datastore should be very cheap, or you could just output as csv text and copy into Google Sheets (free!). Source: almost 4 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing CrateDB and Google Cloud Datastore, you can also consider the following products

Arctype - Free SQL Client for developers and teams. Available for Mac, Windows, Linux, and Web.

MarkLogic Server - MarkLogic Server is a multi-model database that has both NoSQL and trusted enterprise data management capabilities.

Supabase - An open source Firebase alternative

Valentina Server - Valentina Server is 3 in 1: Valentina DB Server / SQLite Server / Report Server

BayesDB - Infer new data from existing sql datasets

Datahike - A durable datalog database adaptable for distribution.