Software Alternatives & Startups

Cozystack VS Embedportal

Compare Cozystack VS Embedportal and see what are their differences

Cozystack

With Cozystack, you can transform your bunch of servers into an intelligent system with a simple REST API for spawning Kubernetes clusters, Database-as-a-Service, virtual machines, load balancers, HTTP caching services, and other services with ease.

No screenshot yet
Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
Embedportal

◎ Embedded analytics, distilled Embed your entire BI stack inside one branded portal. EmbedPortal lets any team ship a white labeled analytics experience in

Embedportal Integrations
Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Paid Free trial $240 / Monthly ("Unlimited users", "Unlimited Dashboards", "BI Integrations")
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Cozystack
Embedportal
Website cozystack.io embedportal.com
Pricing
Open source
Paid Free trial $240 / Monthly ("Unlimited users", "Unlimited Dashboards", "BI Integrations") Official pricing
Platforms
All Google Chrome Firefox Safari Opera Windows MacOS iOS Android Linux +7
Company Startup from the United States · 1 - 9 employees
Listed in

About Cozystack and Embedportal

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

Cozystack
Embedportal

No description of Cozystack yet.

embedportal is embedded analytics, distilled: it lets B2B SaaS companies deliver live BI dashboards to customers, partners, or franchisees — each seeing only their own data, in the company's own branding — by embedding the BI tool they already use (Power BI, Tableau, QuickSight, Metabase) rather...

Read more about Embedportal

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Cozystack 5 features
Embedportal 6 features
  • Free and Open Source
    Cozystack is a fully open-source platform (under Apache 2.0 license) built on top of proven open-source technologies like Kubernetes, Talos Linux, and FluxCD, allowing users to inspect, modify, and contribute to the codebase without vendor lock-in.
  • All-in-One PaaS/IaaS Platform
    Cozystack provides a comprehensive platform that combines PaaS and IaaS capabilities, offering managed Kubernetes clusters, databases (PostgreSQL, MySQL, Redis, etc.), virtual machines, load balancers, and monitoring out of the box, reducing the need for multiple separate tools.
  • Built on Battle-Tested Technologies
    The platform leverages well-established cloud-native technologies such as Kubernetes, KubeVirt for virtualization, Kamaji for managed Kubernetes, and Cilium for networking, providing a solid and reliable foundation rather than reinventing the wheel.
  • Simplified Bare-Metal Deployment
    Cozystack is designed to be installed directly on bare-metal servers using Talos Linux, making it relatively straightforward to set up your own cloud infrastructure without needing pre-existing cloud providers or complex manual configurations.
  • GitOps-Driven and Declarative Management
    Using FluxCD and Helm charts under the hood, Cozystack follows GitOps principles, enabling declarative infrastructure management, reproducible deployments, and easy customization of platform components through a standardized workflow.

Possible disadvantages

  • Steep Learning Curve
    Cozystack requires solid knowledge of Kubernetes, Talos Linux, networking, and various cloud-native technologies. Users unfamiliar with these ecosystems may find the initial setup and ongoing management challenging.
  • Relatively Young and Small Community
    Compared to established platforms like OpenStack or major managed Kubernetes services, Cozystack has a smaller user community, which means fewer community-contributed resources, tutorials, third-party integrations, and slower issue resolution from peers.
  • Limited Enterprise Support and Ecosystem
    As a relatively new open-source project, Cozystack lacks the extensive enterprise support contracts, professional services, and partner ecosystems that more mature platforms offer, which may concern organizations requiring SLA-backed support.
  • Hardware and Infrastructure Requirements
    Cozystack is designed for bare-metal deployments and requires a minimum cluster of nodes with specific hardware capabilities (e.g., for KubeVirt virtualization), which may not be accessible or cost-effective for smaller teams or those without dedicated infrastructure.
  • Limited Documentation and Maturity
    Being a newer project, the documentation can be sparse or incomplete in certain areas, and some features may still be evolving, potentially leading to breaking changes or gaps in functionality compared to more mature alternatives.
  • Pricing Model
    Flat monthly, unlimited viewers — not per-seat ($249–$499/mo)
  • BI integration
    Power BI, Tableau, QuickSight, Metabase — embed the one you already use
  • Security Features
    Multi-tenant row-level security, short-lived signed tokens, TLS 1.3/AES-256
  • Authentication
    SSO/SAML (Professional tier and up)
  • Branding
    Full custom branding per tenant
  • Audit and Compliance
    Immutable audit log, exportable to your own SIEM

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Cozystack
Embedportal

Overall verdict

  • Cozystack is a solid choice for teams wanting a free, open-source PaaS built on Kubernetes, Kubevirt, and Flux, offering a self-hosted alternative to public cloud platforms with strong automation and GitOps principles baked in.

Why this product is good

  • Fully open-source and free, avoiding vendor lock-in and licensing costs
  • Built on proven CNCF technologies like Kubernetes, KubeVirt, and Flux CD
  • Provides a unified platform for both containers and virtual machines
  • Enables self-service infrastructure provisioning similar to major cloud providers
  • Strong GitOps-native approach simplifies deployment consistency and rollback
  • Active development backed by a community and commercial support options
  • Reduces operational overhead by automating cluster and tenant management

Recommended for

  • Organizations wanting to build an internal private cloud platform
  • DevOps teams already invested in Kubernetes and GitOps workflows
  • Companies seeking to reduce reliance on public cloud providers
  • Managed service providers offering PaaS/IaaS to clients
  • Teams needing both VM and container workloads unified under one platform
  • Cost-conscious enterprises looking for open-source cloud infrastructure alternatives

No analysis of Embedportal yet.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Cozystack 3 videos + Add
Embedportal 0 videos + Add

Cozystack community meeting 2024-07-04

More videos

  • Review - Sunkworks - Pt. 56 (Build, Test Cozystack 0.9-pre)
  • Review - Cozystack community meeting 2024.05.09

No Embedportal videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Cozystack
Embedportal
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

Questions & Answers

As answered by people managing Cozystack and Embedportal.

What makes your product unique?

Embedportal's answer:

It's multi-vendor — it embeds the BI tool you already use (Power BI, Tableau, QuickSight, or Metabase) instead of making you rebuild dashboards in a new visualization layer. It's flat-rate, not per-seat, so cost doesn't scale with how many external viewers you're serving. And the multi-tenant security layer (row-level security, white-labeling, SSO/SAML, short-lived signed tokens, audit logging) ships out of the box, live in under an hour per integration.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

Embedportal's answer:

Most embedded-analytics tools (Luzmo, Explo, Embeddable, Qrvey) expect you to rebuild your charts in their visualization layer — wasted work if your dashboards already exist in Power BI or Tableau. Native embedding SDKs (Power BI Embedded, Tableau Embedding) still leave you to build the multi-tenant security layer yourself, a real engineering project. Embedportal skips both: keep your existing dashboards, get the multi-tenant layer built-in, at a flat price instead of one that scales per external viewer.

How would you describe the primary audience of your product?

Embedportal's answer:

B2B SaaS companies with roughly 10-100 employees and a lean engineering team, who have — or are being asked for — a customer-facing analytics feature and can't spare a quarter of engineering time to build it properly. Also agencies delivering themed per-client reporting, and companies with large partner, distributor, or franchise networks that need to push dashboards out to the field.

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

Embedportal's answer:

Stack: Backend = NestJS 11 + TypeScript + PostgreSQL + BigQuery. Frontend = React 19 + TypeScript + Vite 8 + Tailwind 4 + shadcn/ui. dbt Services = dbt 1.7 + BigQuery + Jinja2 + Docker/ECS. Auth = AWS Cognito + SAML SSO, multi-method MFA.

User comments

Share your experience with using Cozystack and Embedportal. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with