Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

Coveralls VS SOAPEngine

Compare Coveralls VS SOAPEngine and see what are their differences

Coveralls

Coveralls is a code coverage history and tracking tool that tests coverage reports and statistics for engineering teams.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
Alternatives Is it good?
SOAPEngine

This generic SOAP client allows you to access web services using a your iOS app, Mac OS X app and AppleTV app. - priore/SOAPEngine

Rating
0 reviews
Alternatives Is it good?
SuperOps
Modern PSA and RMM Software for MSP's and IT Teams sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Coveralls seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 14 times since March 2021.

social mentions
14 vs 0
Code Coverage popularity
100% vs 0%

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Coveralls
SOAPEngine
Website coveralls.io github.com
Pricing
Open source Official pricing
—
Listed in
Code Coverage Code Quality Code Analysis Code Review +1
Mobile Development

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Coveralls 6 features
SOAPEngine 4 features
  • Code Coverage Visualization
    Coveralls provides detailed code coverage reports that help developers visualize which parts of the codebase are thoroughly tested and which are not.
  • Integration with CI/CD Tools
    Coveralls seamlessly integrates with various continuous integration and continuous delivery tools like Jenkins, Travis CI, GitHub Actions, and more, facilitating automated workflows.
  • Multi-language Support
    Coveralls supports a wide array of programming languages, making it a versatile tool for teams working in different tech stacks.
  • Public and Private Repositories
    Coveralls offers services for both public and private repositories, making it suitable for open-source projects as well as private, professional work.
  • Historical Data
    Coveralls maintains historical coverage data, allowing teams to track improvements or regressions in code coverage over time.
  • Badge Generation
    Coveralls generates coverage badges that can be embedded in your repository's README file, providing an at-a-glance view of code coverage status.

Possible disadvantages

  • Pricing
    While Coveralls offers a free tier for open-source projects, the pricing for private projects can be somewhat high, especially for small teams or individual developers.
  • Complex Configuration
    Setting up Coveralls for the first time can be complex and may require intricate configuration, particularly for projects with non-standard setups.
  • Performance Overhead
    Running coverage analysis can introduce performance overhead to the CI/CD pipelines, potentially slowing down build times.
  • Limited Free Tier Features
    The free tier may lack some advanced features and functionalities that are available only in the paid versions, potentially limiting its utility for more complex projects.
  • Learning Curve
    There can be a learning curve associated with understanding and fully utilizing all the features that Coveralls offers.
  • Comprehensive SOAP Support
    SOAPEngine provides robust and thorough support for SOAP-based web services, making it easier for developers to integrate complex SOAP operations in their applications.
  • iOS and macOS Compatibility
    It is designed to work seamlessly with iOS and macOS platforms, ensuring that developers can build applications across Apple’s ecosystem using SOAP services.
  • Easy Integration
    SOAPEngine is relatively straightforward to integrate into existing projects, providing a variety of functionalities needed to quickly start consuming SOAP web services.
  • Automatic XML Parsing
    The library handles the parsing of XML responses automatically, which simplifies the developer's job by abstracting away the complexity of handling XML data.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited to Apple Platforms
    SOAPEngine is specifically designed for iOS and macOS, making it unsuitable for developers targeting cross-platform solutions that include Android or other systems.
  • Outdated Documentation
    Some users might find the documentation for SOAPEngine outdated or lacking clarity, potentially complicating the learning curve for new users.
  • Dependency on SOAP Protocol
    As SOAP is an older protocol compared to REST, developers using SOAPEngine are tied to using SOAP services, which might not be the best fit for newer web service designs.
  • Performance Overheads
    SOAP can introduce performance overheads due to its verbose nature and the XML format, potentially affecting the performance of applications using SOAPEngine.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Coveralls
SOAPEngine

Overall verdict

  • Coveralls is generally considered a good tool for developers and teams looking to monitor and improve their code coverage. Its effectiveness in visualizing coverage data and facilitating continuous integration processes makes it a valuable asset in the software development lifecycle.

Why this product is good

  • Coveralls is a popular code coverage analysis tool that helps developers ensure that their code is adequately tested. By integrating with various CI/CD platforms, it provides detailed insights into which parts of your codebase are covered by tests, helping identify untested sections and improving overall code quality. Furthermore, its user-friendly interface and support for multiple languages make it a versatile tool for teams aiming to maintain high code quality standards.

Recommended for

    Coveralls is recommended for software development teams and individual developers who are focused on improving code quality through comprehensive test coverage. It is especially useful for projects that already utilize CI/CD workflows, as it integrates smoothly into these processes. Teams seeking to maintain high standards of test-driven development will particularly benefit from its features.

Overall verdict

  • SOAPEngine is a solid choice for developers needing SOAP/XML web service integration in Apple ecosystem apps (iOS, macOS, tvOS, watchOS), offering a mature, well-documented library that simplifies working with legacy SOAP-based backends without requiring extensive boilerplate code.

Why this product is good

  • Provides a straightforward Objective-C/Swift API for consuming SOAP web services, abstracting away much of the complexity of manual XML parsing and request construction
  • Supports multiple Apple platforms (iOS, macOS, watchOS, tvOS) making it versatile for cross-platform Apple development
  • Actively maintained with a track record on GitHub, giving developers confidence in its reliability
  • Handles common SOAP complexities like WSDL parsing, authentication, and complex data types
  • Good documentation and examples make it accessible for developers unfamiliar with SOAP intricacies
  • Reduces development time when integrating with older enterprise systems that still rely on SOAP APIs

Recommended for

  • iOS/macOS developers who need to integrate with legacy enterprise SOAP web services
  • Teams maintaining apps that connect to backend systems using WSDL-based services
  • Developers who want to avoid writing manual XML parsing and SOAP envelope construction from scratch
  • Projects requiring cross-platform support across multiple Apple devices with SOAP backend communication
  • Enterprise app developers working in industries (banking, healthcare, government) where SOAP remains a common integration standard

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Coveralls 2 videos + Add
SOAPEngine 0 videos + Add

High Quality Mens Work Clothing Long Sleeve Coveralls review

More videos

  • - Scentlok coveralls review!

No SOAPEngine videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Coveralls
SOAPEngine
100% 100%
Code Coverage
0% 0%
0% 0%
Mobile Development
100% 100%
100% 100%
Code Quality
0% 0%
100% 100%
Code Analysis
0% 0%

User comments

Share your experience with using Coveralls and SOAPEngine. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Coveralls 14 mentions
SOAPEngine 0 mentions
  • Build metrics and budgets with git-metrics
    For open-source projects, many SaaS platforms offer free tiers for monitoring. For tracking code coverage, you can use Codecov or Coveralls. For tracking complexity, CodeClimate is a good option. These platforms integrate well with... - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
  • GitHub Actions for Perl Development
    Cpan_coverage: This calculates the coverage of your test suite and reports the results. It also uploads the results to coveralls.io. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • Perl Testing in 2023
    I will normally use GitHub Actions to automatically run my test suite on each push, on every major version of Perl I support. One of the test runs will load Devel::Cover and use it to upload test coverage data to Codecov and Coveralls. - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago

View more

Tracking SOAPEngine since Mar 2021.

Alternatives to Coveralls and SOAPEngine

When comparing Coveralls and SOAPEngine, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...