
CodeClimate
Codacy
SensioLabs Insight
ESLint
SonarQube
Source-Navigator NG
CodeFactor.io
Coveralls is a code coverage history and tracking tool that tests coverage reports and statistics for engineering teams.

Managed Hosting for developers, entrepreneurs, and businesses like yours

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Coveralls seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 14 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | coveralls.io | opalstack.com |
| Pricing | ||
| Listed in |
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Coveralls is recommended for software development teams and individual developers who are focused on improving code quality through comprehensive test coverage. It is especially useful for projects that already utilize CI/CD workflows, as it integrates smoothly into these processes. Teams seeking to maintain high standards of test-driven development will particularly benefit from its features.
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
High Quality Mens Work Clothing Long Sleeve Coveralls review
More videos
No Opalstack videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


Share your experience with using Coveralls and Opalstack. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


For open-source projects, many SaaS platforms offer free tiers for monitoring. For tracking code coverage, you can use Codecov or Coveralls. For tracking complexity, CodeClimate is a good option. These platforms integrate well with... - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
Cpan_coverage: This calculates the coverage of your test suite and reports the results. It also uploads the results to coveralls.io. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
I will normally use GitHub Actions to automatically run my test suite on each push, on every major version of Perl I support. One of the test runs will load Devel::Cover and use it to upload test coverage data to Codecov and Coveralls. - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago
Tracking Opalstack since Sep 2023.
When comparing Coveralls and Opalstack, you can also consider the following products.

Code Climate provides automated code review for your apps, letting you fix quality and security issues before they hit production. We check every commit, branch and pull request for changes in quality and potential vulnerabilities.
Compare CodeClimate to Coveralls or Opalstack:

Automatically reviews code style, security, duplication, complexity, and coverage on every change while tracking code quality throughout your sprints.
Compare Codacy to Coveralls or Opalstack:

PHP Project Quality Done Right.
Compare SensioLabs Insight to Coveralls or Opalstack:


SonarQube, a core component of the Sonar solution, is an open source, self-managed tool that systematically helps developers and organizations deliver Clean Code.
Compare SonarQube to Coveralls or Opalstack:

Source-Navigator NG is a source code analysis tool.
Compare Source-Navigator NG to Coveralls or Opalstack: