Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Cotter VS intl-tel-input

Compare Cotter VS intl-tel-input and see what are their differences

Cotter logo Cotter

One-click phone number login and checkout

intl-tel-input logo intl-tel-input

jQuery plugin for validating international telephone numbers
  • Cotter Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-12-10
  • intl-tel-input Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-27

Cotter features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    Cotter offers a clean and intuitive interface, making it easy for developers to implement authentication solutions without a steep learning curve.
  • Passwordless Authentication
    Cotter supports passwordless authentication, providing a secure and convenient way for users to log in using methods like email or mobile number without needing a password.
  • Multi-Platform Support
    The platform supports web and mobile applications, allowing you to integrate authentication across different device types seamlessly.
  • Fast Integration
    Cotter provides comprehensive documentation and code snippets, which helps in speeding up the integration process for developers.
  • Cost-Effective
    Pricing plans are competitive and often more affordable compared to other authentication platforms, making it suitable for startups and small businesses.

Possible disadvantages of Cotter

  • Limited Customization
    While Cotter is easy to use, it offers limited customization options, which might be a drawback for businesses with specific branding or workflow requirements.
  • Scalability Issues
    Cotter is suitable for small to medium-sized businesses, but it may not scale well for enterprises with extensive and complex authentication needs.
  • Lack of Advanced Features
    Compared to other authentication services, Cotter lacks some advanced features like adaptive authentication, detailed analytics, and role-based access control.
  • Dependency on Third-Party Services
    Relying on a third-party service for authentication can introduce dependencies and potential vulnerabilities, which may be a concern for businesses requiring higher security.
  • Support Limitations
    Customer support options may be limited, especially for lower-tier plans, which could be problematic when immediate technical support is needed.

intl-tel-input features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Analysis of Cotter

Overall verdict

  • Cotter can be considered a good solution for businesses and developers who are looking to enhance security while simplifying the login process for users. Its ease of integration and focus on passwordless technology make it a compelling choice for those prioritizing user experience and security.

Why this product is good

  • Cotter is a passwordless authentication solution designed to improve security and user experience. It allows users to log in using methods such as one-time passwords (OTPs) sent via email or phone, social logins, or other passwordless options. This approach can reduce the risk of breaches related to password theft or weak passwords.

Recommended for

  • Developers needing easy integration of authentication systems
  • Businesses looking to enhance security by eliminating passwords
  • Applications aiming to improve user experience through seamless login processes
  • Companies seeking to reduce the risk of credential stuffing attacks

Cotter videos

A Review of Organic Mushroom Farming and Mycoremediation by Tradd Cotter

More videos:

  • Review - Meet Mabel and Olive: Andrew Cotter's world famous Labradors! | 60 Minutes Australia
  • Review - Review of Fix Your Swing Plane , by Robert Cotter [Video Summary]

intl-tel-input videos

No intl-tel-input videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Cotter and intl-tel-input)
Developer Tools
89 89%
11% 11
APIs
100 100%
0% 0
AI
0 0%
100% 100
Identity Provider
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Cotter and intl-tel-input. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, intl-tel-input should be more popular than Cotter. It has been mentiond 3 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Cotter mentions (1)

intl-tel-input mentions (3)

  • Build bigger, better, and faster with upgraded design and dev superpowers Read the recap โ†’ Phone prefix from int-tel-input wonโ€™t show in Webflow Logic
    Hi all, I am working on a clientโ€™s website with a form calling their API with Logic and the form has a phone with a prefix. I have added the phone prefix with this javascript plugin - GitHub - jackocnr/intl-tel-input: A JavaScript plugin for entering and... Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Geolocation form Wordpress plugin WANTED
    There's a fantastic JS library that will do the country detection and has a great UI for entering the country code and validation https://github.com/jackocnr/intl-tel-input. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • Input formatting wtforms Flask
    Since there's no dedicated phone number field in wtforms, you would have to use javascript for that, maybe use a readymade library like this one https://github.com/jackocnr/intl-tel-input. Source: almost 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Cotter and intl-tel-input, you can also consider the following products

MojoAuth - Allow users to login without passwords

NaturalReader - Main Feature: Full Common Functions: Read Text Files o Text files o MS Word files

Amazon Cognito - Amazon Cognito lets you add user sign-up, sign-in, and access control to your web and mobile apps quickly and easily. It scales to millions of users and supports sign-in with social identity providers and enterprise identity providers via SAML 2.0.

Verbatik - AI Powered Text to Speech Converter

Authentiq - Strong authentication, without the passwords

SafeContext API - As developers, we are constantly challenged to ensure end-user input will not damage the community.