Copy Me That VS cppq

• Ease of Use
  Copy Me That offers a straightforward interface allowing users to quickly copy and save recipes from any website. This user-friendly approach makes it accessible for users of all technical skill levels.
• Cross-Platform Access
  The service is accessible on multiple devices, including smartphones, tablets, and desktops, ensuring that users can access their saved recipes anywhere.
• Recipe Organization
  Copy Me That provides features for organizing recipes into custom collections and categories, helping users keep their recipes neatly sorted and easy to find.
• Browser Extension
  A browser extension allows for quick and easy saving of recipes directly from web pages with a single click, enhancing user convenience.
• Shopping List
  The service includes a shopping list feature where users can add ingredients from their recipes, streamlining meal planning and grocery shopping.
• Free Version
  Copy Me That offers a free version with a robust set of features, making it accessible to a wide range of users without any initial investment.

Possible disadvantages

• Limitations of Free Version
  While the free version is robust, certain advanced features may require a subscription, limiting full access to the functionality for non-paying users.
• Manual Cleaning
  Sometimes, recipes copied from websites may require manual cleaning up or editing to remove unnecessary sections or advertisements, which can be time-consuming.
• Learning Curve
  Despite its general ease of use, some users may experience a slight learning curve in fully utilizing all available features and organizing their recipe collections efficiently.
• Dependency on Internet
  Accessing saved recipes and utilizing features like shopping lists and browser extensions require an internet connection, which could be a limitation in areas with poor connectivity.
• Data Privacy
  As with any online service, there are potential concerns regarding data privacy and security. Users must rely on the company’s measures to protect their information.

• Lightweight C++ implementation
  cppq is written in modern C++ and designed to be a minimal, efficient task queue library, making it a good fit for performance-sensitive applications where the overhead of scripting language runtimes is undesirable.
• Redis-backed reliability
  Built on top of Redis as the message broker, cppq benefits from Redis's persistence, atomic operations, and wide adoption, giving the queue system durability and the ability to survive process restarts.
• Inspired by proven design (asynq)
  The library's architecture mirrors the popular Go asynq task queue, so it inherits a well-thought-out API design for task enqueueing, retries, and worker processing patterns that have already been validated in production systems.
• Native integration for C++ projects
  For teams already working in a C++ codebase, cppq allows adding background job processing without needing to introduce a separate service written in another language (like Go or Python), simplifying the technology stack.
• Open source and inspectable
  Being open source on GitHub, developers can review the source code, modify it for custom needs, and contribute improvements, which offers transparency not available with closed-source queueing solutions.

Possible disadvantages

• Limited maturity and battle-testing
  Compared to established task queue libraries like Sidekiq, Celery, or asynq itself, cppq is a newer and smaller project with less real-world production usage, which may translate into undiscovered bugs or edge cases.
• Smaller community and ecosystem
  Because it has far fewer users and contributors than mainstream task queue systems, finding community support, third-party tutorials, or pre-built integrations is more difficult.
• Documentation gaps
  As a smaller project, cppq may have less comprehensive documentation compared to major task queue frameworks, requiring developers to read source code directly to understand advanced features or edge-case behaviors.
• C++ build and dependency complexity
  Using cppq requires managing C++ build toolchains and dependencies (such as a Redis client library), which can be more cumbersome than installing a package via pip or npm in other ecosystems.
• Fewer built-in features and tooling
  cppq likely lacks the extensive ecosystem tooling of more mature queues, such as web-based monitoring dashboards, extensive metrics/observability integrations, or advanced scheduling features found in more established solutions.

Copy Me That - Review & Demo - Save recipes from many sites to a single app

More videos

No cppq videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

• with high inflation how have your saved money, grown your cooking skills etc?

  The app copymethat and the meal planner ad on: life changing. I can look back to this week last year and just copy the whole week and turn the recipes into a shopping list in a heart beat. Source: over 3 years ago

• Is it pointless to have a small collection of cookbooks when there are so many recipes online?

  I use copymethat.com It's a chrome extension that you just have to press a button and it copies it to your own list of recipes (aka won't change if the OP changes it). Source: over 3 years ago

• How to preserve old recipes

  I'm sure a lot of people here know of the site, but our family started using copymethat.com to keep family recipes on and share with each other. I'd already used it for it's original purpose of copying recipes from websites (because they... Source: about 4 years ago

View more

Tracking cppq since Nov 2022.