Coolify
Railway
Heroku
Netlify
Render UIKit
Vercel
CapRover
DigitalOcean
Amazon Elastic Transcoder
HandBrake
VideoLan
BombBomb
Renderforest
Rendi
Moovly
Reflector
Coolify Amazon Elastic TranscoderBased on our record, Coolify seems to be a lot more popular than Amazon Elastic Transcoder. While we know about 96 links to Coolify, we've tracked only 8 mentions of Amazon Elastic Transcoder. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Coolify puts those tasks behind a web interface. It is an open-source, self-hosted platform for deploying applications and databases to infrastructure you control. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
That's the gap Coolify walks into. It promises the thing a lot of teams have been quietly thinking: why pay $20 per seat or $25 per process to a US platform when a $6 server hosts the same app? The answer isn't "never" and it isn't "always." It's a calculation โ and that calculation has one line item both sides conveniently leave off the landing page. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
Install Coolify (free, open source) on a VPS and deploy Memos from its catalog. You get a web UI and auto-updates, but Coolify itself wants ~2 GB of RAM, which is heavier than the app it is managing. Worth it only if you are already running Coolify for other apps. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
Coolify is a self-hosted PaaS. Deploy from git, automatic SSL, databases โ basically Vercel/Heroku but on your own $5/month VPS. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
Before getting to know why we switch from cloud to coolify, ask yourself "what is the cloud?". - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
That's certainly true to an extent. Other commenters have already highlighted necessary complexities. There is absolutely a lot of very entrenched "ways-of-working" that add unnecessary complexity, as with every domain. Not everything is a technical problem though and the social / process side of this sort of setup is what can make it work at all. The approach that you're hinting mostly describes the general... - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
Alternatively, if your Internet connection can handle it, you could upload your videos to a cloud service that processes them for you. For example, Amazon's AWS has a transcoding service called Elastic, which charges 3 cents per minute of video (half of that if it's lower than 720p). Might be worth the reduced time and effort for business use. Source: about 3 years ago
If you're looking for an AWS specific solution, check out Amazon Elastic Transcoder. I think it'll do what you want with a pipeline and you can do it serverless. Source: almost 4 years ago
If you use https://aws.amazon.com/elastictranscoder/ then you donโt need a computer, itโs a managed service, get your files to s3 somehow and thats it. There are some other services from other providers that can do the same too, I strongly encourage to look into that, unless you have specific encoding specs that you canโt do somewhere. Source: over 4 years ago
However compressing on the server is the better option in case you want to generate gifs, thumbnails, and different sizes and formats of the video. A lot of big video streaming companies will use something like Amazons media convert. Source: almost 5 years ago
Railway - Made for any language, for projects big and small.
HandBrake - HandBrake allows users to easily convert video files into a wide variety of different formats.
Heroku - Agile deployment platform for Ruby, Node.js, Clojure, Java, Python, and Scala. Setup takes only minutes and deploys are instant through git. Leave tedious server maintenance to Heroku and focus on your code.
VideoLan - VLC: Official site - Free multimedia solutions for all OS!
Netlify - Build, deploy and host your static site or app with a drag and drop interface and automatic delpoys from GitHub or Bitbucket
BombBomb - BombBomb allows companies to easily record and send video email from Gmail, mobile, or web.
