Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

ContractShield.dev VS authzed

Compare ContractShield.dev VS authzed and see what are their differences

ContractShield.dev logo ContractShield.dev

Open-source API security middleware โ€” contract-first validation beyond the WAF.

authzed logo authzed

The platform to store, compute, and validate app permissions
  • ContractShield.dev Monitoring exemple
    Monitoring exemple //
    2026-02-16
  • ContractShield.dev Gateway
    Gateway //
    2026-02-16
  • ContractShield.dev Multi-platform
    Multi-platform //
    2026-02-16
  • ContractShield.dev Boundary
    Boundary //
    2026-02-16

ContractShield is open-source runtime API security middleware that validates every API request against your OpenAPI contract. It catches business logic attacks โ€” authentication bypasses, BOLA/IDOR, parameter tampering, prototype pollution โ€” that traditional WAFs and API gateways miss because they only inspect payloads, not business rules. Think of it this way: API gateways are bouncers checking IDs at the door. ContractShield enforces the business rules inside the venue.

How it works:

Drop ContractShield into your API as middleware. It reads your OpenAPI specification and enforces it at runtime โ€” every request is validated against your contract before it reaches your application logic. Undocumented endpoints get blocked. Missing authentication gets rejected. Schema violations get caught. No agents, no sidecars, no infrastructure changes. Key capabilities:

  • Schema-enforced authentication and authorization
  • Deny-by-default for undocumented endpoints
  • CEL (Common Expression Language) invariants for custom business rules
  • Sink-aware RASP protection for injection detection (Pro)
  • Real-time blocking or monitoring mode
  • 5-minute integration with zero infrastructure changes

Multi-platform support:

  • Node.js / Express / Fastify (npm: @cshield/core)
  • Python / FastAPI / Flask (PyPI: contractshield)
  • Java / Spring Boot (Maven: dev.contractshield)

Covering ~80% of the API development market.

Open-core model:

Core features are Apache 2.0 licensed. Advanced capabilities like sink-aware RASP, Learning Mode, and BOLA auto-detection are available under commercial license.

Security certifications:

OWASP ASVS Level 1 compliant, OpenSSF Scorecard, OpenSSF Best Practices Passing, SLSA Build Level 1 provenance, CodeQL scanning.

ContractShield also offers Penetration Testing as a Service (PTaaS) for organizations that need expert-led API security assessments alongside automated protection.

  • authzed Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-22

ContractShield.dev

$ Details
freemium
Platforms
Python Java Node JS Linux MacOS Windows Azure AWS Docker
Release Date
2026 January
Startup details
Country
Switzerland
Founder(s)
David Martin
Employees
1 - 9

authzed

$ Details
-
Platforms
-
Release Date
-

ContractShield.dev features and specs

  • OpenAPI Contract Validation
    Validates every request against your OpenAPI/Swagger specification
  • Deny-by-Default Mode
    Blocks undocumented endpoints automatically
  • Schema-Enforced Authentication
    Rejects requests missing required auth headers
  • CEL Policy Engine
    Custom business rules via Common Expression Language
  • OWASP API Top 10 Coverage
    Protects against BOLA, broken auth, injection, mass assignment
  • Runtime Blocking & Monitoring
    Switch between blocking (403) and audit-only modes
  • Sink-Aware RASP Protection
    Deep injection detection at code level (Pro)
  • Zero Infrastructure Changes
    Standard middleware โ€” no agents, sidecars, or proxies
  • 5-Minute Integration
    One package install, one line of config
  • Open Source Core
    Apache 2.0 licensed, fully auditable
  • Multi-Platform Support
    Node.js, Python, Java โ€” covers ~80% of API dev market
  • Security Certified
    OWASP ASVS Level 1, OpenSSF Scorecard, SLSA Build Level 1

authzed features and specs

  • Fine-Grained Access Control
    Authzed provides fine-grained access control via its Zanau authorization system, allowing for highly specific permissions and access rules tailored to complex requirements.
  • Scalability
    Authzed is designed to handle large-scale applications and supports millions of users and permissions scenarios efficiently.
  • Open Source
    Authzed offers an open-source approach with SpiceDB, allowing developers to contribute and adapt the platform to their specific needs while benefiting from community support.
  • API-Driven
    The platform is API-driven, offering seamless integration with existing systems and technologies, making it easier for developers to incorporate into their architectures.
  • Cloud-Native
    Designed for modern cloud environments, Authzed supports cloud-native development practices, such as containerization and microservices architectures.

Possible disadvantages of authzed

  • Learning Curve
    Due to its detailed and customizable features, there is a steep learning curve associated with implementing Authzed, which may require more time and resources initially.
  • Complexity
    The system's capability for fine-grained permissions can add complexity to integration and management, potentially complicating simpler authorization needs.
  • Documentation Depth
    While improvements are continuously made, the documentation might not be as comprehensive or beginner-friendly as some users require, potentially complicating onboarding for new users.
  • Dependency on External Service
    Utilizing Authzed as an external service may introduce dependencies and concerns about service stability, uptime, and third-party management.
  • Early Stage
    As a relatively new entrant in the authorization space, some potential users may be hesitant to adopt Authzed due to concerns over the maturity and long-term support of the platform.

Analysis of ContractShield.dev

Overall verdict

  • I don't have verified information about ContractShield.dev (contractshield.dev) to assess its quality, features, pricing, or reputation. I cannot confirm whether this is a legitimate, established, or well-regarded product since it may be a newer, niche, or unindexed service not covered in my training data.

Why this product is good

  • No verifiable details available about its feature set, security practices, or track record
  • Cannot confirm company legitimacy, team credentials, or customer reviews
  • Unable to assess pricing, support quality, or contract audit accuracy without direct access or documented sources
  • Recommend checking the site directly, looking for user reviews, testimonials, and checking domain registration/company history before trusting it with sensitive contract data

Recommended for

  • Users should independently verify this service through direct research, third-party reviews, and security audits before use
  • Not recommended to rely on this assessment alone for any legal, financial, or contract-related decisions

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to ContractShield.dev and authzed)
Cyber Security
100 100%
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100
API Tools
100 100%
0% 0
APIs
0 0%
100% 100

Questions & Answers

As answered by people managing ContractShield.dev and authzed.

What makes your product unique?

ContractShield.dev's answer

ContractShield is the only open-source middleware that enforces your OpenAPI contract at runtime โ€” not just for documentation, but as a security policy.Most API security tools either scan for vulnerabilities (shift-left testing) or inspect payloads for known attack patterns (WAFs). ContractShield does neither. It sits inside your application and validates every request against what your API should do, not what attacks look like.

  • Deny-by-default: if an endpoint isn't in your OpenAPI spec, it doesn't exist
  • Schema-enforced auth: missing authentication is blocked regardless of whether your app forgot to check
  • CEL invariants: custom business rules that execute on every request
  • Zero infrastructure changes: standard middleware, 5-minute integration

The result: it catches business logic attacks โ€” authentication bypasses, BOLA/IDOR, parameter tampering, prototype pollution โ€” that produce perfectly valid HTTP requests every WAF in the world allows through.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

ContractShield.dev's answer

  • vs. WAFs (Cloudflare, AWS WAF, Reblaze): WAFs can't see business logic. A GET /api/v1/users/456 from an attacker looks identical to a legitimate request. ContractShield understands the contract and blocks it.

  • vs. API security platforms (Salt, Noname, Traceable): These are enterprise-grade, agent-based, and expensive. ContractShield is lightweight middleware you install in 5 minutes with zero infrastructure changes.

  • vs. API testing tools (Akto, Escape.tech, Pynt): These find vulnerabilities before production. ContractShield blocks attacks in production โ€” they're complementary, not competing.

  • Open source core (Apache 2.0): No vendor lock-in, fully auditable code, free for production use. Security certifications include OWASP ASVS Level 1, OpenSSF Scorecard, and SLSA Build Level 1 provenance.

  • Multi-platform from day one: Node.js, Python, and Java โ€” covering ~80% of the API development market.

How would you describe the primary audience of your product?

ContractShield.dev's answer

  • Backend developers and API engineers building REST APIs who want runtime protection without adding infrastructure complexity

  • DevSecOps teams looking to enforce API contracts as security policy in CI/CD and production

  • CTOs and engineering leads at startups and mid-market companies who need API security beyond their WAF but can't justify six-figure enterprise platform contracts

  • Regulated industries (fintech, healthtech, identity verification) where API business logic protection is a compliance requirement

  • Teams already using OpenAPI specifications โ€” ContractShield turns their existing documentation into an active security layer

What's the story behind your product?

ContractShield.dev's answer

ContractShield was born from years of penetration testing. Running API security assessments for clients, we kept finding the same pattern: organizations had invested in WAFs, API gateways, and network security โ€” yet their APIs were wide open to business logic attacks.

Authentication bypasses. BOLA/IDOR. Parameter tampering. Prototype pollution. Every single one produced clean, valid HTTP requests that sailed through every layer of infrastructure security. The vulnerability wasn't in the payload โ€” it was in the logic.

We realized the gap: infrastructure tools protect the transport layer, but nobody was protecting the contract layer โ€” the actual business rules that define what an API should and shouldn't do.

So we built ContractShield as middleware that reads your OpenAPI specification and enforces it at runtime. Your API contract becomes your security policy. If it's not in the spec, it's blocked. If auth is required, it's enforced. If the schema says no, it means no.

We open-sourced the core under Apache 2.0 because API security shouldn't be a luxury reserved for enterprises with six-figure budgets. We continue to offer Penetration Testing as a Service (PTaaS) alongside the product โ€” because automated protection and expert assessment together provide the strongest security posture.

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

ContractShield.dev's answer

  • TypeScript/Node.js โ€” Core middleware engine and npm packages (@cshield/core, @cshield/pro)
  • Python โ€” FastAPI and Flask middleware adapters (PyPI: contractshield)
  • Java/Spring Boot โ€” Spring Boot starter for enterprise Java APIs (Maven Central)
  • OpenAPI/Swagger โ€” Contract parsing and schema validation engine
  • CEL (Common Expression Language) โ€” Policy engine for custom business rule invariants
  • GitHub Actions โ€” CI/CD, CodeQL security scanning, SLSA provenance, automated publishing
  • Astro โ€” Marketing site and documentation

Who are some of the biggest customers of your product?

ContractShield.dev's answer

ContractShield PTaaS (our own penetration testing platform runs on ContractShield). Privacy is our moto, contact us for more information.

User comments

Share your experience with using ContractShield.dev and authzed. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, authzed seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 9 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

ContractShield.dev mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of ContractShield.dev yet. Tracking of ContractShield.dev recommendations started around Feb 2026.

authzed mentions (9)

  • Open Policy Agent
    Https://docs.opal.ac/ Universally, people I've met and worked with (20-30) hate writing rego (OPA). I'm always skeptical of Styra's analysis; they are literally selling you something. AuthZed looks interesting and they have good "ride along" videos in YouTube, e.g. Replicating GitHub auth. https://authzed.com/. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • Understanding Google Zanzibar and Why Shines at Building Permissions
    Plugging another company that's been implementing Google-Zanzibar-like auth tech: https://authzed.com/. - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
  • The developerโ€™s guide to IAM buzzwords
    Leading Authorization services include: โ Permit.io, AuthZed, Ory Keto, Styra DAS. - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago
  • Permissions (access control) in web apps
    Https://authzed.com/ (Provider) AuthZed brings a specialized SpiceDB permissions database which they use as a centralized place for storing and managing rules. Then, you can use their SDKs to query, store, and validate application permissions. - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago
  • Ask HN: Who is hiring? (February 2022)
    Authzed (YC W21) | Senior Site-Reliability Engineer (SRE) | NYC, Remote USA | Full-Time | https://authzed.com/ 20 milliseconds at the 99.5 percentile and five-nines (99.999) of uptime. Those are our goals for our globally-distributed permissions system as a service. If youโ€™re interested in helping us achieve these goals, we would like to talk. Weโ€™re currently using best-in-class open source solutions on the public... - Source: Hacker News / over 4 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing ContractShield.dev and authzed, you can also consider the following products

Reblaze - Reblaze is a cloud-native web application and API protection solution

Cerbos - Cerbos helps teams separate their authorization process from their core application code, making their authorization system more scalable, more secure and easier to change as the application evolves.

Akto - Akto is an Instant, Open Source API Security product. Discover all your APIs and find vulnerabilities by running 100+built-in tests. Write custom tests and automate in Akto.

Aserto - Fine-grained, scalable authorization in minutes

Escape.tech - Escape helps teams secure modern applications - APIs, Single Page Apps, and Microservices by finding business logic flaws at scale with proprietary algorithm and empowering developers to fix them efficiently.

Warrant - Authorization and access control infrastructure for developers