Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Confs.tech VS ManualTesting.dev

Compare Confs.tech VS ManualTesting.dev and see what are their differences

CloudCLI
Shared cloud environments for AI coding agents. Run Claude Code, Cursor CLI, Codex, and Gemini CLI from any device, API, or automation tool. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. ยป Base Details
  2. ยป Reviews
  3. ยป Alternatives

Confs.tech logo Confs.tech

Open source list of tech conferences: JS / Ruby / Data etc.

ManualTesting.dev logo ManualTesting.dev

Manual Testing for Developers - Test Management Tool for developers and startups
  • Confs.tech Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-11
  • ManualTesting.dev Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-03-26

Confs.tech features and specs

  • User-friendly Interface
    Confs.tech offers an intuitive and easy-to-navigate interface, making it simple for users to find conferences relevant to their interests.
  • Comprehensive Conference Listings
    The platform provides a wide range of listings for tech conferences around the world, categorized by month and technology stack.
  • Bookmarking Feature
    Users can bookmark conferences for easy access later, helping them to organize their schedules and keep track of events they are interested in.
  • Community Driven
    Confs.tech relies on community contributions for keeping the list of conferences up-to-date, ensuring that the information is both current and relevant.
  • Tech Stack Categories
    Allows users to filter conferences based on specific tech stacks, making it easier for developers to find events tailored to their specific interests.

Possible disadvantages of Confs.tech

  • Reliance on Community Updates
    As the platform depends on community inputs, there might be delays or incomplete information if not enough contributors update the listings consistently.
  • Limited Details on Conferences
    The site provides basic information only, and users often need to visit the actual conference website to get detailed information like schedules and speakers.
  • No User Reviews or Ratings
    There are no user reviews or ratings for conferences, which could help users make more informed decisions about which events to attend.
  • Focus on Tech Conferences Only
    The platform is specialized for tech events, which may not be useful for users looking for conferences in other fields.
  • Mobile Experience
    Some users might find the mobile experience less optimal compared to the desktop version, affecting ease of access on-the-go.

ManualTesting.dev features and specs

  • Focused on Manual Testing
    ManualTesting.dev is specifically dedicated to manual testing, providing a niche resource for QA professionals who need to strengthen their manual testing skills rather than being overwhelmed by automation-focused content.
  • Beginner-Friendly
    The platform appears designed to be accessible for those new to software testing, offering foundational knowledge and guidance that helps newcomers enter the QA field without requiring prior technical expertise.
  • Structured Learning Path
    The site offers organized content that guides learners through manual testing concepts in a logical progression, making it easier to build knowledge incrementally rather than jumping between disconnected topics.
  • Practical and Job-Oriented
    The platform focuses on practical, real-world manual testing skills that are directly applicable to job roles, helping testers prepare for actual work scenarios and interviews in QA positions.
  • Free or Affordable Access
    ManualTesting.dev provides accessible content without significant financial barriers, making it a cost-effective option for individuals looking to learn manual testing without investing in expensive courses or certifications.

Possible disadvantages of ManualTesting.dev

  • Limited Scope
    By focusing exclusively on manual testing, the platform may not adequately prepare testers for the modern QA landscape where automation skills are increasingly expected and valued by employers.
  • Relatively Unknown Platform
    ManualTesting.dev is not as well-established or widely recognized as major learning platforms like Udemy, Coursera, or ISTQB resources, which may limit community support and peer interaction.
  • Limited Advanced Content
    The platform may lack depth for experienced QA professionals looking for advanced testing methodologies, complex test strategy development, or specialized domain testing knowledge.
  • Smaller Community
    Compared to larger testing communities like Ministry of Testing or Software Testing Help, the platform likely has a smaller user base, resulting in fewer discussion opportunities, peer reviews, and networking possibilities.
  • Content Freshness Concerns
    As a smaller, niche website, there may be concerns about how frequently the content is updated to reflect current industry trends, tools, and best practices in manual testing.

Analysis of ManualTesting.dev

Overall verdict

  • ManualTesting.dev appears to be a niche resource site focused on manual testing concepts, tutorials, and interview preparation for QA professionals. It's a solid, budget-friendly (often free) option for learners wanting to build foundational manual testing skills, though it may lack the depth, interactivity, or certification value of paid, structured courses.

Why this product is good

  • Provides free or low-cost access to manual testing concepts and materials, making it accessible for beginners
  • Focuses specifically on manual testing, offering targeted content rather than generic QA overviews
  • Often includes practical examples, sample test cases, and interview questions useful for job seekers
  • Simple, straightforward format that's easy to digest without needing extensive technical setup
  • Useful as a supplementary study resource alongside other QA learning platforms

Recommended for

  • Beginners entering the QA/software testing field looking for foundational knowledge
  • Job seekers preparing for manual testing interview questions
  • Students or self-learners who want free supplementary material on testing concepts
  • QA professionals needing a quick refresher on manual testing fundamentals
  • Those on a tight budget who can't afford premium testing courses or bootcamps

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Confs.tech and ManualTesting.dev)

Confs.tech

ManualTesting.dev

Web App
100 100%
Web App
0% 0
Software Development Tools
0 0%
Software Development Tools
100% 100
Tech
100 100%
Tech
0% 0
Software Development
0 0%
Software Development
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Confs.tech and ManualTesting.dev. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Confs.tech should be more popular than ManualTesting.dev. It has been mentiond 8 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Confs.tech mentions (8)

  • 100 Most-Watched Software Engineering Talks of 2024
    There's a good directory of conferences at https://confs.tech/ and at https://dev.events/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • An Engineer's Toolkit for continuous upskilling
    To curate a list of talks for future viewing, I visit websites like confs.tech or dev.events, focusing on Backend engineering and Golang conferences. From there, it's a dive into individual conference websites to choose the talks to my "watch later" list. I give preference to conferences with shorter 30-minute talks over longer 50-minute sessions. As I think they provide better value to time ration. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
  • Ask HN: For $5000, what conferences or online training would you attend/buy?
    I found a pretty good conf aggregator here: https://confs.tech/?online=hybrid&topics=data Hopefully it can assist. - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
  • Speaking at Tech Conferences - Finding a CFP
    Some of these platforms like sessionize or papercall.io even let you set up your different talks as well as information about yourself, including your socials and speaker bio. This helps you keep track of conferences you have already applied for, quickly find new openings and submit your full applications at a click of a button. If you plan to submit many talks in the future, this might be good option to look... - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago
  • Are tech conferences a thing in Europe?
    Where to find them? Well just like the US I guess, just look into some event website likehttps://dev.events/https://confs.tech/Some might be targeted to the local language, but the better ones (IMO) are always in english. Source: almost 4 years ago
View more

ManualTesting.dev mentions (1)

  • How I improved my confidence, code quality and became a better developer
    We built ManualTesting.dev, a simple and powerful tool, to help my team and people like me write code, test it, and deliver on time with confidence. - Source: dev.to / over 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Confs.tech and ManualTesting.dev, you can also consider the following products

Huntathon - Browse and submit Product Hunt Global Hackathon projects

Foundler - Online hackathon weekends. Attend every other week.

Konflist - Curated list of tech conferences all around the world!

Sessionize - Sessionize is the smart way to manage Call for Papers, Speakers and Agenda for your conference.

Woz U - Steve Wozniak's new tech education platform

Free Code Camp - Learn to code by helping nonprofits.

Loading...