Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

ConEmu VS QuickPlay

Compare ConEmu VS QuickPlay and see what are their differences

ConEmu

ConEmu-Maximus5 is a full-featured local terminal for Windows devs, admins and users. Get better console window with tabs, splits, Quake style, copy+paste, DosBox and PuTTY integration, and much more.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
Alternatives Is it good?
QuickPlay

Quickplay the universal emulator Frontend

Rating
0 reviews
Alternatives Is it good?
Solitaire Arcade
Play free Solitaire and classic card games online, with no download required. sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, ConEmu seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 19 times since March 2021.

social mentions
19 vs 0
SSH popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
174 vs 41

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

ConEmu
QuickPlay
Website conemu.github.io quickplay.sourceforge.net
Pricing
Open source
—
Listed in
SSH Server Management Terminal Tools Server Configuration And Automation +1
Gaming Games Online Games Video +1

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

ConEmu 6 features
QuickPlay 4 features
  • Customizability
    ConEmu offers a high degree of customizability, allowing users to tailor the interface, keyboard shortcuts, colors, and behavior to suit their workflow.
  • Tab Management
    The application supports multiple tabs, permitting users to manage various command-line sessions within a single window, enhancing multitasking capabilities.
  • Integrations
    ConEmu can integrate with various shells such as Command Prompt, PowerShell, Git Bash, Cygwin, and more, thus making it a versatile tool for a wide range of needs.
  • Quake-style Mode
    This feature allows users to quickly summon and hide the terminal with a specific key combination, similar to the drop-down console in Quake games.
  • Split View
    ConEmu offers split-view functionality, which allows users to see and interact with multiple terminal panes simultaneously.
  • Portable Mode
    The application can be used in portable mode, enabling users to carry their ConEmu settings and preferences across different machines without installation.

Possible disadvantages

  • Complex Setup
    For new users, the initial configuration can be somewhat complex and may require a steep learning curve to leverage all features effectively.
  • Windows Only
    ConEmu is exclusive to the Windows operating system, limiting its usage for individuals who work across multiple OS platforms.
  • Resource Intensive
    Compared to some lightweight terminal emulators, ConEmu can be more demanding on system resources, which may be a concern for users on lower-end hardware.
  • Occasional Stability Issues
    Some users have reported occasional crashes or instability, particularly when dealing with complex configurations or extensive usage.
  • Lack of Built-in SSH
    Unlike some terminal emulators, ConEmu does not come with built-in SSH capabilities, necessitating the use of third-party tools for SSH sessions.
  • Lightweight
    QuickPlay is designed to be lightweight, which means it has a minimal impact on system resources, making it ideal for older or less powerful hardware.
  • Supports Multiple Emulators
    QuickPlay supports a wide range of emulators, allowing users to enjoy games from different platforms within a single interface.
  • Customizable Interface
    The interface of QuickPlay is customizable, offering users the ability to tailor the software to their liking and enhance their user experience.
  • Free and Open Source
    Being an open-source project, QuickPlay is free to use, and users can contribute to its development or modify the software to suit their needs.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited Updates
    QuickPlay may not receive frequent updates, which could lead to compatibility issues with newer emulators or gaming platforms.
  • Learning Curve
    New users might find it challenging to set up and configure QuickPlay initially due to its requirement for manual setup and emulator integration.
  • Dependence on Emulator Compatibility
    QuickPlay's performance and compatibility largely depend on the specific emulators it integrates with, which can vary in terms of quality and stability.
  • No Native Game Support
    QuickPlay itself does not run games natively; it acts as a front-end for other emulators, which means users must manage emulator compatibility separately.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

ConEmu
QuickPlay

Overall verdict

  • Yes, ConEmu is a good option for users seeking a powerful and customizable terminal emulator on Windows. Its feature-rich environment and active development community make it a solid choice.

Why this product is good

  • ConEmu is considered a good terminal emulator because it offers a wide range of features including extensive customization options, support for multiple tabs, and compatibility with various shells such as PowerShell, Command Prompt, and WSL. It enhances productivity by allowing users to configure hotkeys, split the terminal window, and create complex workflows, making it a versatile tool for developers and system administrators.

Recommended for

    ConEmu is recommended for developers, system administrators, and power users who need a flexible and feature-rich terminal emulator. It's particularly useful for users who frequently work with multiple command-line tools or need advanced window management capabilities.

No analysis of QuickPlay yet.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

ConEmu 1 video + Add
QuickPlay 3 videos + Add

Development Tools: ConEmu

Quickplay Spot Rebounder Review - Is it worth the money?

More videos

  • - QuickPlay Review
  • - QuickPlay kickster elite 1.5x1m goal review

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
ConEmu
QuickPlay
100% 100%
SSH
0% 0%
0% 0%
Gaming
100% 100%
100% 100%
Server Management
0% 0%
0% 0%
Gaming Software
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using ConEmu and QuickPlay. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

ConEmu no reviews yet
QuickPlay no reviews yet

We have no reviews of QuickPlay yet. Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

ConEmu 19 mentions
QuickPlay 0 mentions
  • Dos Navigator – an orthodox file manager
    The sources for the awesome Dos Navigator are published on Github. An updated fork named Necromancer's Dos Navigator [NDN] can be found here: http://ndn.muxe.com/ An alternative to DN/NDN, that is in active development, is Far Manager:... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
  • Any user with Win 7 user + Vim at terminal+airline_with_Powerline_symbols?
    On Windows 7 your best bet is to install a modern terminal emulator like ConEmu: https://conemu.github.io/. Source: over 3 years ago
  • The amount of times I have accidentally done this...
    On my work system I have local admin but Windows Store is blocked by policy. One of my coworkers over on the DBA team had me install ConEmu which has some nice features similar to to Windows Terminal. Also, Posh-Git is a nice addition to... Source: over 3 years ago

View more

Tracking QuickPlay since Mar 2021.

Alternatives to ConEmu and QuickPlay

When comparing ConEmu and QuickPlay, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...