Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

collected VS CrossBrowserTesting

Compare collected VS CrossBrowserTesting and see what are their differences

collected

collected is a web design showcase which shows only eight sites, shuffled on every visit.Unlike other showcases, you will find new sites all the time instead of being limited to the recent entries.New sites are added to the stack every day.

Rating
0 reviews
Alternatives Is it good?
CrossBrowserTesting

Browser Testing made simple! Run automated, visual, and manual tests on 1500+ real browsers and mobile devices. Test more browsers, in less time.

Rating
0 reviews
Alternatives Is it good?
STATUS: Project Governance
STATUS: Project Governance — lightweight project governance for professional project managers and consultants. Keep RAID, decisions and actions live, then export client-ready status reports. For iPhone, iPad and Mac. sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, CrossBrowserTesting seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 6 times since March 2021.

social mentions
0 vs 6
Design Tools popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
64 vs 158

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

collected
CrossBrowserTesting
Website collected.jonaspelzer.com crossbrowsertesting.com
Pricing —
Official pricing
Listed in
Design Tools User Experience Marketing Twitter Prototyping +2
Website Testing Browser Testing Automated Testing Project Management +1

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

collected 4 features
CrossBrowserTesting 7 features
  • Ease of Use
    Collected offers a user-friendly interface that simplifies the process of gathering and organizing content from the web.
  • Organization
    The tool enables users to efficiently categorize and tag content, making it easier to retrieve specific information later.
  • Collaboration
    Collected allows for seamless sharing and collaboration among teams or groups, facilitating better communication and productivity.
  • Integration
    It can integrate with various web services and platforms, enhancing its functionality and ease of content management.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited Features
    Some users might find the feature set limited compared to other comprehensive content management systems.
  • Cost
    If Collected requires a subscription fee, it might be considered expensive for individual users or small teams with limited budgets.
  • Learning Curve
    Although it is generally user-friendly, some users might experience a learning curve when adapting to the platform's functionalities.
  • Dependence on Internet
    Functionality can be limited in offline modes, making it necessary for users to have a stable internet connection.
  • Wide Range of Browsers and Devices
    CrossBrowserTesting offers a large selection of browsers and devices, allowing developers to test their applications in various environments to ensure compatibility.
  • Live Testing
    Users can perform live interactive testing on real devices, enabling them to manually verify the behavior of their application and catch issues that automated tests might miss.
  • Automated Testing Integration
    The platform provides integration with popular testing frameworks and tools such as Selenium, Appium, and others, facilitating automated testing workflows.
  • Visual Testing
    CrossBrowserTesting offers visual testing capabilities, allowing users to compare screenshots from different browsers to identify design inconsistencies.
  • Comprehensive Reports
    Detailed test reports with screenshots and logs are generated, helping users to quickly identify and address issues found during testing.
  • Parallel Testing
    The service supports parallel testing, enabling users to run multiple tests simultaneously, significantly reducing the overall testing time.
  • Easy-to-Use Interface
    The user interface is intuitive and user-friendly, making it easy for both beginners and experienced testers to navigate and utilize the platform effectively.

Possible disadvantages

  • Cost
    CrossBrowserTesting can be expensive, especially for small teams or individual developers who might find the subscription plans to be cost-prohibitive.
  • Performance
    Tests on real devices can sometimes be slow due to the availability and network constraints, which can affect the overall efficiency of the testing process.
  • Limited Mobile Devices
    While the platform includes a variety of devices, the selection might not cover all the latest models or less common devices, potentially limiting testing coverage.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    Some advanced features and integrations might require a learning curve, which could be challenging for users who are not familiar with automated testing or the specific tools supported.
  • Test Timeout Issues
    Occasional issues with test timeouts have been reported, which can disrupt the testing process and require reruns or additional troubleshooting.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

collected
CrossBrowserTesting

No analysis of collected yet.

Overall verdict

  • CrossBrowserTesting is generally regarded as a good solution for cross-browser testing needs, particularly for teams that require real-time testing and robust automation capabilities. Its ease of use, extensive browser/device coverage, and integration options make it a strong choice for many development and QA teams.

Why this product is good

  • CrossBrowserTesting is considered a valuable tool because it provides a cloud-based platform for testing websites and mobile applications across different browsers, devices, and operating systems. It enables developers and QA teams to ensure that their applications function correctly on various platforms without needing to maintain a complex setup of physical devices. The platform offers real-time debugging, automated screenshot testing, and integration with various CI/CD tools, which streamlines the testing process.

Recommended for

    This service is highly recommended for software development teams, QA engineers, and web developers who need to ensure compatibility and functionality of their web applications across multiple browsers and devices. It is particularly useful for organizations with a focus on maintaining high-quality user experiences across various platforms.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

collected 2 videos + Add
CrossBrowserTesting 1 video + Add

Jorge Luis Borges - Collected Fictions BOOK REVIEW

More videos

  • - The Collected Schizophrenias | Book Review

Cross Browser Testing Tool Comparison – LambdaTest vs. CrossBrowserTesting

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
collected
CrossBrowserTesting
100% 100%
Design Tools
0% 0%
0% 0%
Website Testing
100% 100%
100% 100%
User Experience
0% 0%
0% 0%
Browser Testing
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using collected and CrossBrowserTesting. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

collected 0 mentions
CrossBrowserTesting 6 mentions

Tracking collected since Oct 2021.

  • How can I test my site on safari if I don't have a Mac ?
    Yeah I moved on pretty quick from browserstack, but it seems to be the most popular. I've tried crossbrowsertesting.com but at the moment I really like app.lambdatest.com. Source: about 4 years ago
  • great list of "cool" sites from hnews
    Https://geizhals.de/ - this is a german site but the UI is nice and you can find a lot of stuff. Https://www.gsmarena.com/search.php3? - a phone search site. When I was at https://crossbrowsertesting.com we used this site a... - Source: dev.to / over 4 years ago
  • Learn How To Create, Test and Deploy a Single Page App with Vue 3 + Vite and Pinia
    Fortunately we don’t need to install, nor configure, any other tools, unless maybe some fancy reporters, but for now we can get everything we need in terms of end-to-end automated testing out of Nightwatch. Besides Chrome, Nightwatch has... - Source: dev.to / over 4 years ago

View more

Alternatives to collected and CrossBrowserTesting

When comparing collected and CrossBrowserTesting, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...