Cody AI Reviews

BrowserStack Reviews

Cody AI mentions (35)

• The $847/year Developer Tool Stack That Replaced My $4,200 SaaS Subscriptions

  Sourcegraph Cody and Continue.dev both offer AI code completion using open models. Cody works with Claude, Continue works with local LLMs via Ollama. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago

• AI Tools for Developer Productivity: Hype vs. Reality in 2025

  GitHub Copilot, Cody, and Supermaven fall into this category. They live inside your existing IDE as extensions, watching what you type and suggesting completions. The marketing implies they understand your codebase, your intentions, and your architectural decisions. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago

• Looking Beyond Cline? Here's The 7 Best Cline Alternatives to Check Out!

  Amp eliminates the setup burden Cline requires while adding collaboration features that isolated AI assistants can't provide. Built by the team behind Sourcegraph's Code Search and Cody (which was deprecated back in July), it's designed for engineering teams that need shared context and collective learning, not just individual productivity. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago

• Love Cursor but Need Options? 7 AI Tools That Excel Where Cursor Doesn’t

  Amp builds on many of the same ideas as Cursor — contextual understanding, fast refactoring, and multi-model intelligence — but scales them for teams. Developed by the team behind Cody and Code Search, Amp adds collaboration and shared memory to the mix. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago

• Windsurf Not Cutting It? 7 AI Coding Tools That Raise the Bar

  Amp eliminates the bottlenecks that limit many AI coding tools. Instead of credit systems that throttle complex tasks, Amp provides unlimited scalability. Built by the team behind Sourcegraph’s Code Search and Cody, it extends individual coding assistance into organizational collaboration. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago

BrowserStack mentions (8)

• Show HN: Quell – AI QA Agent Working Across Linear, Vercel, Jira, Netlify, Figma

  This is pretty cool - the Jira/Linear integration could save a ton of manual work. How do you handle test data setup and teardown? That's usually where these workflows get messy. For alternatives in this space, there's qawolf (https://qawolf.com) for similar automated testing workflows, or I'm actually building bug0 (https://bug0.com) which also does AI-powered test automation, still in beta. For the more... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago

• 🛑 Stop resizing your browser: improve testing for responsiveness

  Platforms like Browserstack or SauceLabs offer virtual instances of real devices and browsers for manual and end-to-end testing. Caveat: subscriptions cost money and are on a per-seat basis. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago

• Unsupported country

  If you go to browserstack.com (a website to test other websites) you can probably to the chatgpt url and sign up there. Source: over 3 years ago

• Windows vs Mac?

  For testing on Mac or iOS, use browserstack.com, you'll spend considerably less using that than you would buying the actual hardware. Source: over 3 years ago

• Free methods for testing websites/apps across devices?

  I've seen subscription services such as browserstack.com and lambdatest.com but I believe they cost to get the full range of mac browsers and devices. Source: over 3 years ago