
Free Dev Tools Studio
CodeTray.dev
DeveloperToolBox.tech
DeveloperTools.Tech
DevLab.tools
DevNestTools
DevTool.io
Free, fast, and practical developer tools that run instantly in your browser. JSON, encoding, hashing, time, and more.

Logseq
Obsidian
Zim Wiki
Nuclino
Trilium Notes
TiddlyWiki
Roam Research
Personal knowledge management and sharing on VSCode & GitHub

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Foam seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 49 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | codingtool.dev | foambubble.github.io |
| Pricing | ||
| Company | — | Startup from the United States |
| Listed in |
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


No features have been listed yet.
Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


No analysis of CodingTool.dev yet.
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
No CodingTool.dev videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
These panels DESTROYED my STUDIO....REVERB? - ArrowZoom Foam Review
More videos
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing CodingTool.dev and Foam.
CodingTool.dev's answer
CodingTool.dev brings 330+ developer utilities into one fast, privacy-focused platform. Most tools run locally in the browser, while tools that require network or server processing clearly disclose it. There is no signup, no installation, and no paywall. The platform also supports multiple languages and covers everything from data conversion and API debugging to security, productivity, PDF, browser, and AI developer tools.
CodingTool.dev's answer
CodingTool.dev focuses on three things: breadth, privacy, and zero friction. Instead of switching between many single-purpose websites, developers can access hundreds of tools from one consistent interface. Most processing happens locally in the browser, processing boundaries are clearly disclosed, and users can start immediately without creating an account or installing anything. All tools are free to use.
CodingTool.dev's answer
CodingTool.dev is primarily built for software developers and technical professionals, including frontend, backend, full-stack, DevOps, QA, security, and API engineers. It is also useful for students, technical creators, and anyone who frequently works with code, structured data, APIs, files, debugging, or developer workflows.
CodingTool.dev's answer
CodingTool.dev started from a simple frustration: having to jump between dozens of websites for everyday development tasks such as formatting JSON, decoding data, testing regular expressions, or generating hashes.
As a full-stack developer, I wanted a single place where these utilities were fast, trustworthy, and easy to use without registration or unnecessary data uploads. What began as a small collection of tools gradually grew into CodingTool.dev, which now provides 330+ utilities for developers.
The guiding principle remains simple: build tools that are genuinely useful in everyday development work.
CodingTool.dev's answer
CodingTool.dev is primarily built with Next.js 15, React 19, TypeScript, Tailwind CSS, shadcn/ui, and next-intl. The platform uses the Next.js App Router and is designed around a local-first architecture, with most deterministic processing performed directly in the browser.
CodingTool.dev's answer
CodingTool.dev is a free, self-service platform with no required user accounts, so we do not maintain or publicly disclose a list of named customers. It is used by developers across startups, independent projects, and enterprise environments.
Share your experience with using CodingTool.dev and Foam. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Tracking CodingTool.dev since Oct 2026.
Choose a local Markdown tool like Obsidian, Logseq, Foam, or Tolaria to store all your knowledge as plain .md files you own and control. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
I've been using foam instead of obsidian for my personal knowledge base. It works rather well. And it's completely free and ultimately just markdown. While I might wish it was djot, I don't wish hard enough to make that so myself... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
I gave up on Obsidian and just use Foam (https://foambubble.github.io/foam/) and/or vimwiki. I just can’t get into overwrought, arbitrarily designed organization schemes or proprietary apps (Foam-managed content is just plain Markdown,... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
When comparing CodingTool.dev and Foam, you can also consider the following products.

FreeDevTools- Your digital Swiss Army knife: security, coding, design, and media tools. 50 tools free to use. No signup required.
Compare Free Dev Tools Studio to CodingTool.dev or Foam:

Logseq is a local-first, non-linear, outliner notebook for organizing and sharing your personal knowledge base.
Compare Logseq to CodingTool.dev or Foam:
Fast, free developer tools. JSON formatter, Base64, JWT, Regex and more. Runs 100% in your browser.
Compare CodeTray.dev to CodingTool.dev or Foam:

A second brain, for you, forever. Obsidian is a powerful knowledge base that works on top of a local folder of plain text Markdown files.
Compare Obsidian to CodingTool.dev or Foam:

Free browser-based tools for formatting, encoding, decoding, conversion, generators and everyday software development tasks.
Compare DeveloperToolBox.tech to CodingTool.dev or Foam:

Zim is a graphical text editor used to maintain a collection of wiki pages. Each page can contain links to other pages, simple formatting and images.
Compare Zim Wiki to CodingTool.dev or Foam: