Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

Codility VS Kendor

Compare Codility VS Kendor and see what are their differences

Codility

Codility provides a SaaS platform with advanced validation, security and protection features to evaluate the skills of software engineers.

Rating
0 reviews
Alternatives Is it good?
Kendor

See how engineers actually work. Live or async technical interviews, in your repo, right in the browser.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Paid $500 / Monthly
Alternatives Is it good?
Sugarbug
Connect your tools into a living knowledge graph. Sugarbug captures every signal to deliver compounding insights and unified context. sponsored

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Codility seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 2 times since March 2021.

social mentions
2 vs 0
Hiring And Recruitment popularity
97% vs 3%
alternatives listed
240+ vs 6

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Codility
Kendor
Website codility.com kendor.io
Pricing
Official pricing
Paid $500 / Monthly Official pricing
Platforms
Web Browser
Web
Company — 2026
Listed in
Hiring And Recruitment Digital Interview Platform Online Learning Online Education Pre-employment Testing Technical Skills Assessment +3
Technical Hiring Tool Hiring And Recruitment Hiring Tools AI Hiring Recruitment Ai Recruitment Skill Assessment AI +5

About Codility and Kendor

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

Codility
Kendor

The Codility platform includes: CodeCheck - Design role-specific remote skills assessments to screen your technical candidates before moving them to the interview stage. CodeLive - Host technical remote or onsite interviews via our shared editor using a range of templates and whiteboards....

Read more about Codility

Kendor is a technical hiring platform for running live coding interviews and take-home assessments in a real development environment instead of a puzzle editor. Each candidate gets an isolated cloud sandbox in the browser with a VS Code editor, a terminal, running services and a live preview....

Read more about Kendor

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Codility 7 features
Kendor 15 features
  • Automated Assessment
    Codility provides automated coding assessments that save time for both recruiters and candidates by quickly identifying technical abilities.
  • Standardized Testing
    Codility offers standardized tests, ensuring evaluations are consistent and unbiased across all candidates.
  • Diverse Question Bank
    The platform has a large repository of coding problems that cover a wide range of topics and difficulty levels, catering to various roles and expertise levels.
  • Real-Time Code Execution
    Codility allows for real-time code execution and validation, enabling candidates to see the results of their code immediately.
  • Customizable Tests
    Recruiters can create custom tests tailored to the specific needs of their company or position, making the assessments more relevant.
  • Detailed Reports
    Codility provides detailed reports and analytics on candidate performance, helping hiring managers to make data-driven decisions.
  • Integration Capabilities
    The platform integrates with various Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS) and other HR tools, streamlining the recruiting process.

Possible disadvantages

  • Cost
    Codility can be relatively expensive, especially for small companies or startups with limited recruitment budgets.
  • Learning Curve
    There might be a learning curve for both recruiters and candidates to get accustomed to the platform and its features.
  • Language Limitations
    While Codility supports multiple programming languages, some niche or less commonly used languages may not be available.
  • Potential Stress for Candidates
    Automated assessments can induce stress for candidates, which might not accurately reflect their true abilities in a real-world setting.
  • Internet Connection Dependency
    A stable internet connection is required to complete assessments, which can be a limitation in areas with unreliable internet access.
  • Limited Collaboration Features
    Codility's focus on individual assessments means it has limited support for evaluating collaborative or team-based coding skills.
  • Algorithm Focus
    The platform often emphasizes algorithmic problem-solving, which may not fully represent the day-to-day coding skills required for certain positions.
  • Real development environment
    A full VS Code editor in the browser, backed by a cloud sandbox with a terminal, a live preview and code completion. Nothing for candidates to install.
  • Live coding interviews
    Pair with candidates in the same environment, with a built-in video call and a shared editor.
  • Interview review and AI summaries
    Rate candidates, leave comments, and get an AI summary of each submission or interview.
  • Bring your own codebase
    Start an interview from your own GitHub or GitLab repository, including private ones, or from a ready template.
  • Multi-language projects
    Node.js, TypeScript, Python, Go, Java, Rust, C++ and PHP, from single-file exercises to full-stack apps.
  • Built-in databases and services
    PostgreSQL and Valkey run inside the sandbox, and candidates can even run Docker containers for multi-service projects.
  • AI coding agents, visible
    Let candidates use Claude Code or Codex in the terminal when you choose, and review every prompt and change they made.
  • Take-home assessments
    Send async coding tasks with a time limit. Candidates join from a link, with no account needed.
  • ATS integrations
    Send assessments and sync results with Ashby, Greenhouse and Lever.
  • Custom branding
    Your logo and company name on candidate pages and emails.
  • EU data residency and GDPR
    Data stored in the EU, with candidate data export and erasure, and retention policies.
  • API requests panel
    A built-in Postman-style client for testing the APIs candidates build.
  • Interview review and AI summaries
    Rate candidates, leave comments, and get an AI summary of each submission or interview.
  • Session replay
    Play back how a solution was built: the typing timeline, terminal sessions and the AI conversation.
  • Integrity signals
    See tab switches and pastes on a timeline, shown to candidates before they start.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Codility 1 video + Add
Kendor 0 videos + Add

An Introduction to Codility: The Tech Hiring Platform for Engineering Teams

No Kendor videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Codility
Kendor
97% 97%
Hiring And Recruitment
3% 3%
94% 94%
Skill Assessment
6% 6%
100% 100%
Candidate Screening And Assessment
0% 0%
0% 0%
Recruitment
100% 100%

Questions & Answers

As answered by people managing Codility and Kendor.

What makes your product unique?

Kendor's answer:

Kendor runs technical interviews in a real development environment, not a puzzle editor. Candidates work in a full VS Code editor in the browser, backed by a secure cloud sandbox that runs their code. That can be your own repository, with real services, a live preview and databases like PostgreSQL and Valkey. They can use AI coding agents such as Claude Code and Codex when you allow it, and reviewers see exactly how the AI was used. Live interviews happen in the same environment, with a built-in video call. You see how someone actually works, not how well they memorised algorithm puzzles.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

Kendor's answer:

Most assessment tools still test isolated puzzles in a simple editor, and treat AI as cheating. Kendor reflects how engineers work today:

  • Real projects instead of puzzles: start from your own GitHub or GitLab repository or a ready template, in Node.js, TypeScript, Python, Go, Java, Rust, C++ or PHP.
  • AI allowed and visible: you decide whether candidates may use AI agents, and every prompt and change is there for review.
  • One place for take-homes and live interviews: the same environment, with video calls, a shared editor and review summaries.
  • Fits your hiring process: integrations with Ashby, Greenhouse and Lever. Candidates need no account and nothing to install.
  • Clear pricing: from $79/month with unlimited candidates, with an annual discount, instead of opaque per-seat enterprise quotes.
  • Built for the EU: GDPR-ready, with data stored in the EU.

How would you describe the primary audience of your product?

Kendor's answer:

Engineering-led hiring teams at startups and growing tech companies: CTOs, engineering managers and the recruiters who work with them. They want to see how a candidate really builds software, including with AI tools, rather than how they score on algorithm puzzles. Kendor suits teams hiring a few engineers at a time as well as companies running technical screens at volume.

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

Kendor's answer:

TypeScript throughout:

  • React with TanStack Start for the web app
  • NestJS with PostgreSQL (Prisma) and Valkey for the API
  • a Docker-based sandbox service, built with Fastify, that runs each candidate’s code in an isolated container
  • VS Code’s editor running in the browser, with language servers inside the sandbox
  • LiveKit for video calls and Yjs for real-time collaborative editing
  • integrations with Anthropic (Claude Code) and OpenAI (Codex) for AI agents
  • hosted in the EU, with storage on Amazon S3 and delivery through Cloudflare

What's the story behind your product?

Kendor's answer:

I started building it when I was hiring engineers and found no good solution in the market. Most at the time focus on Leetcode like puzzle-tests and I didn't think they were realistic skill assessment for the job. So for the first couple of hires, we were just sending candidates repos with READMEs as take home assessment with manual timer. But the problem with that is we have no insights to how they work or what's their thinking process was while implementing it(Now with Agentic coding, it's even harder). And everything was manual including reviewing process so it wasted a lot of time. So I built Kendor to make my own hiring process easier and my colleagues liked it as well so they started using it for hiring as well.

User comments

Share your experience with using Codility and Kendor. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

Codility no reviews yet
Kendor no reviews yet
  • Examining Top 22 Alternatives to LeetCode
    www.inven.ai · Jun 2024

    Codility is a platform that helps companies assess the coding skills of developers. They offer a range of online coding tests and assessments that enable employers to evaluate candidates' technical abilities.

We have no reviews of Kendor yet. Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Codility 2 mentions
Kendor 0 mentions
  • How to Hire Mobile App Developers
    - Technical skills: have they got the walk to match the talk? Programming languages on a resume mean little if candidates are unable to demonstrate their hard coding skills. You can test these skills with technical skill tests, such as... - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • Best Websites Every Programmer Should Visit
    Codility : Verify and improve coding skills. - Source: dev.to / over 5 years ago

Tracking Kendor since Oct 2026.

Alternatives to Codility and Kendor

When comparing Codility and Kendor, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...