Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

CodeSubmit VS DevScreen

Compare CodeSubmit VS DevScreen and see what are their differences

CodeSubmit logo CodeSubmit

Make Better Hiring Decisions Real-World Technical Interviews

DevScreen logo DevScreen

Automated, practical interview assessments for developers
  • CodeSubmit Landing page
    Landing page //
    2020-02-16

Identify great candidates using real tasks, not brainteasers. Streamline your tech recruiting workflow and make better hiring decisions.

  • DevScreen Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-12-10

CodeSubmit

$ Details
paid Free Trial $99 / Monthly (15 candidates/month and access to the CodeSubmit library)
Platforms
Web
Release Date
2019 March

CodeSubmit features and specs

  • Real-world assessment
    CodeSubmit allows employers to assess candidates using real-world coding assignments, which better evaluates a candidate's practical skills compared to traditional algorithmic quizzes.
  • Customizable assessments
    Employers can tailor the coding assignments according to the specific requirements of the job role, providing a more relevant evaluation process.
  • Integration with recruiting tools
    CodeSubmit offers integration with popular recruiting tools like Greenhouse and Lever, making it easier to streamline the candidate evaluation process.
  • Detailed feedback and insights
    Recruiters and developers can give detailed feedback and gain insights from the candidate's code submissions, helping in making informed hiring decisions.
  • Candidate experience
    Candidates benefit from a practical and engaging coding challenge that more accurately reflects their potential day-to-day work, improving their overall experience.

Possible disadvantages of CodeSubmit

  • Time-consuming
    Creating and managing customized coding tests can be time-consuming for hiring teams, especially if assessments need to be regularly updated or tailored to different roles.
  • Potential for bias
    If not carefully designed, coding assessments might introduce bias, potentially overlooking relevant skills not covered in the test.
  • Limited assessment of soft skills
    While CodeSubmit evaluates technical skills effectively, it might not be sufficient to assess a candidate's communication, collaboration, and other soft skills.
  • Dependence on resource availability
    For smaller companies, dedicating resources to manage and review coding tests might be challenging amidst other recruitment responsibilities.
  • Learning curve for recruiters
    Some recruiters might face a learning curve to fully utilize the platform's features, especially if they are more accustomed to traditional recruitment assessments.

DevScreen features and specs

  • Efficient Screening
    DevScreen allows companies to efficiently assess the technical skills of candidates through coding challenges, reducing the time and effort needed for initial screenings.
  • Customizable Tests
    The platform offers customizable coding tests that can be tailored to match the specific requirements of the job role or organization.
  • Objective Evaluation
    DevScreen provides an objective way to evaluate candidates' coding abilities, minimizing potential biases that can occur in traditional hiring processes.
  • Scalable Solution
    It can handle a large number of applicants, making it suitable for companies that need to screen many candidates efficiently.
  • Detailed Analytics
    The platform offers detailed analytics and reporting on candidate performance, helping recruiters make informed hiring decisions.

Possible disadvantages of DevScreen

  • Technical Familiarity Required
    Recruiters need some level of technical expertise to understand and set up the coding challenges effectively.
  • Limited Skill Assessment
    While it focuses on coding skills, DevScreen may not comprehensively assess other important qualities such as problem-solving skills or cultural fit.
  • Potential for Candidate Stress
    Timed coding challenges can create stress for candidates, which might not accurately reflect their true abilities.
  • Risk of Cheating
    There's a potential risk of candidates using unfair means or external help during unsupervised online assessments.
  • Initial Setup Time
    Organizations might need a significant initial time investment to set up the tests and integrate the platform into their existing recruitment workflow.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to CodeSubmit and DevScreen)
Hiring And Recruitment
72 72%
28% 28
Online Learning
100 100%
0% 0
Recruitment
65 65%
35% 35
Candidate Screening And Assessment

User comments

Share your experience with using CodeSubmit and DevScreen. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, CodeSubmit seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

CodeSubmit mentions (1)

DevScreen mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of DevScreen yet. Tracking of DevScreen recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing CodeSubmit and DevScreen, you can also consider the following products

HackerRank - HackerRank is a platform that allows companies to conduct interviews remotely to hire developers and for technical assessment purposes.

Reviewly - Create take-home projects to send to your job candidates, where you can ask them to code, discuss an issue, and/or review a PR directly in a private repository on GitHub.

Codility - Codility provides a SaaS platform with advanced validation, security and protection features to evaluate the skills of software engineers.

CodeSignal - CodeSignal is the leading assessment platform for technical hiring.

Coderbyte - Coderbyte is a place built for anyone to practice and perfect their programming skills.

iMocha - Make intelligent talent decisions.