
Jenkins
CircleCI
Travis CI
Bamboo
TeamCity
Azure DevOps
Bitrise
Codeship is a fast and secure hosted Continuous Delivery platform that scales with your needs.

Wallarm
Metlo API Security
PromptGuard
SecureStack
API security risk scoring platform, Instant API & AI security scan, no setup required.

Which is more popular?
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | cloudbees.com | middlebrick.com |
| Pricing | ||
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


No description of Codeship yet.
middleBrickAPI Security Risk Scoring Platform middleBrick scans any API endpoint and returns a security risk score (A+ through F) with actionable findings — no agents, no config, no credentials required. How it works Submit a URL or OpenAPI spec. middleBrick runs 12+ security checks in parallel...
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


No analysis of Codeship yet.
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
LinuxFest Northwest 2017: Continuous Delivery to Microsoft Azure with Docker through Codeship
More videos
No middleBrick videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing Codeship and middleBrick.
middleBrick's answer:
middleBrick assigns a quantitative risk score (0-100) to any API in seconds, not weeks. It covers OWASP API Top 10, GraphQL, and LLM/AI-specific security checks in a single scan. It integrates directly into developer workflows via CLI, GitHub Action, and MCP server for AI assistants — no sales calls, no setup meetings.
middleBrick's answer:
Most API security tools require enterprise contracts, complex onboarding, or inline proxies. middleBrick is fully self-service: scan any API endpoint in minutes even with a free account.
middleBrick's answer:
DevSecOps engineers, API developers, and security teams at startups and scale-ups who need to test their APIs for vulnerabilities without long procurement cycles. Also teams building AI/LLM-powered products who need to secure their model-facing APIs.
Share your experience with using Codeship and middleBrick. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.


Codeship, a CI/CD platform based in the cloud, has an interface that is easy for users and it can integrate with numerous tools and services people are familiar with. It works well for different programming languages...
CodeShip is a CloudBees SaaS platform that provides a managed CI/CD experience in the cloud. It’s designed to give control back to developers by providing a guided workflow for creating and maintaining CI/CD...
You could consider using CodeShip to help you to optimize CI/CD cloud deployment. CodeShip can be used by just about any type of development team that looks to increase the efficiency and automation of their code...
We have no reviews of middleBrick yet. Be the first one to post
When comparing Codeship and middleBrick, you can also consider the following products.

Jenkins is an open-source continuous integration server with 300+ plugins to support all kinds of software development
Compare Jenkins to Codeship or middleBrick:

Wallarm WAF is AI-powered Platform that automates real-time application protection combines Active Threat Verification engine with a DevOps friendly NG-WAF and security testing for websites, microservices and APIs across public and private clouds.
Compare Wallarm to Codeship or middleBrick:

CircleCI gives web developers powerful Continuous Integration and Deployment with easy setup and maintenance.
Compare CircleCI to Codeship or middleBrick:

Open Source API Security Platform
Compare Metlo API Security to Codeship or middleBrick:

Simple, flexible, trustworthy CI/CD tools. Join hundreds of thousands who define tests and deployments in minutes, then scale up simply with parallel or multi-environment builds using Travis CI’s precision syntax—all with the developer in mind.
Compare Travis CI to Codeship or middleBrick:
