Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login
MD

Codeship VS Macro Deck

Compare Codeship VS Macro Deck and see what are their differences

NinjaOne
NinjaOne (Formerly NinjaRMM) provides remote monitoring and management software that combines powerful functionality with a fast, modern UI. Easily remediate IT issues, automate common tasks, and support end-users with powerful IT management tools. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. ยป Base Details
  2. ยป Videos
  3. ยป Reviews
  4. ยป Alternatives

Codeship logo Codeship

Codeship is a fast and secure hosted Continuous Delivery platform that scales with your needs.

Macro Deck logo Macro Deck

Use smartphone as macropad for pc
  • Codeship Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-19
  • Macro Deck Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-30

Codeship features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Codeship offers an intuitive interface that simplifies the setup process, making it accessible for developers who may not be experienced with continuous integration (CI) and continuous deployment (CD) tools.
  • Integration with Cloud Services
    Codeship integrates seamlessly with cloud services such as AWS, Google Cloud, and Heroku, facilitating easy deployment of applications.
  • Flexible Workflows
    The tool provides support for both Codeship Basic and Codeship Pro, allowing for flexibility in choosing between a more straightforward or a more customizable CI/CD workflow.
  • Docker Support
    Codeship Pro offers extensive support for Docker, allowing developers to use containerization strategies for their build and deployment processes.
  • Parallel Test Pipelines
    It supports parallel test pipelines, which can significantly speed up the testing process and reduce build times.
  • Slack Integration
    Codeship integrates with communication tools like Slack, enabling notifications and updates directly within team communication channels.

Possible disadvantages of Codeship

  • Cost
    Codeship can be more expensive compared to other CI/CD tools, particularly for larger teams or more complex projects that require more build resources.
  • Limited Customization
    For highly customized CI/CD processes, Codeship Basic might be limiting. Users may need to switch to Codeship Pro, which requires more configuration and a steeper learning curve.
  • Performance Bottlenecks
    Users have reported occasional performance bottlenecks, particularly under heavy workloads, which can slow down the CI/CD pipeline.
  • Plugin Ecosystem
    The plugin ecosystem for Codeship is not as extensive as some other CI/CD tools like Jenkins, potentially limiting its integration capabilities.
  • Learning Curve
    While Codeship Basic is relatively easy to use, Codeship Pro has a steeper learning curve, particularly for users who are new to Docker and advanced CI/CD practices.
  • Support
    Although support is available, some users have reported slower response times and less comprehensive support compared to other CI/CD platforms.

Macro Deck features and specs

  • Customizability
    Macro Deck allows users to create and customize their own button layouts and actions, providing a high level of personalization to fit specific user needs and workflows.
  • Cost-effective
    Macro Deck is available for free, making it an attractive option for users who need a powerful macro tool without the expense associated with commercial alternatives.
  • Plugin Support
    The platform supports plugins, enabling the integration of additional features and functionalities that extend the application's capabilities.
  • Cross-platform Compatibility
    Macro Deck can be used on multiple devices including Windows and Android, allowing for flexibility in how users interact with the software.
  • Easy Setup
    The software is relatively simple to set up, making it accessible to users who may not have advanced technical skills.

Possible disadvantages of Macro Deck

  • Limited iOS Support
    Macro Deck does not currently offer native support for iOS devices, which can be a limitation for users heavily reliant on Apple products.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its ease of use, new users might encounter a learning curve while familiarizing themselves with the wide array of functions and customization options.
  • Reliability
    As with many open-source or free applications, users may experience occasional bugs or stability issues that can affect reliability.
  • Community-driven Development
    The development and support of the software rely heavily on the community, which may result in slower updates and less immediate customer support compared to commercial options.

Codeship videos

+ Add

LinuxFest Northwest 2017: Continuous Delivery to Microsoft Azure with Docker through Codeship

More videos:

  • Review - The Codeship --ย Continuous Deployment made simple

Macro Deck videos

+ Add

Turn your Android phone into an Elgato Stream Deck! - Macro Deck Tutorial

More videos:

  • Review - FREE STREAM DECK ALTERNATIVE for the Elgato Stream Deck! Macro Deck Android App Review 2020

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Codeship and Macro Deck)

Codeship

Macro Deck

Continuous Integration
100 100%
Continuous Integration
0% 0
Entertainment
0 0%
Entertainment
100% 100
DevOps Tools
100 100%
DevOps Tools
0% 0
Office & Productivity
0 0%
Office & Productivity
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Codeship and Macro Deck. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Codeship and Macro Deck

Codeship Reviews

The Best Alternatives to Jenkins for Developers
Codeship, a CI/CD platform based in the cloud, has an interface that is easy for users and it can integrate with numerous tools and services people are familiar with. It works well for different programming languages and platforms, which makes it suitable for many teams involved in development work.
Source: morninglif.com
Top 10 Most Popular Jenkins Alternatives for DevOps in 2024
CodeShip is a CloudBees SaaS platform that provides a managed CI/CD experience in the cloud. Itโ€™s designed to give control back to developers by providing a guided workflow for creating and maintaining CI/CD pipelines. This avoids much of the complexity thatโ€™s associated with Jenkins.
Source: spacelift.io
10 Jenkins Alternatives in 2021 for Developers
You could consider using CodeShip to help you to optimize CI/CD cloud deployment. CodeShip can be used by just about any type of development team that looks to increase the efficiency and automation of their code delivery. You can get started within minutes and gain access to an incredible amount of control when setting everything up. The customization options will seem...
Source: solutionsuggest.com
The Best Alternatives to Jenkins for Developers
CodeShip is a hosted continuous integration and continuous delivery platform found by CloudBees. It provides fast feedback and customized environments to build applications. It provides integration with almost anything and is good at helping you scale as per your needs. It comes free for up to 100 monthly builds.
Source: www.lambdatest.com

Macro Deck Reviews

We have no reviews of Macro Deck yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Macro Deck seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 9 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Codeship mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Codeship yet. Tracking of Codeship recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Macro Deck mentions (9)

  • Use Surface Pro 4 as Input Switcher
    I've looked at OBS Remote and macrodeck.org, deckboard.app, but these are all for changing scenes on the same device. I'd like something similar to a Crestron switch panel, but on my Surface Pro 4 instead. Source: about 3 years ago
  • Is making the switch from SLOBS to OBS a good idea?
    Also, if you do not have an Elgato Stream Deck, it has way more compatibility with Deckboard and MacroDeck (apps that let you use your phone as a Stream Deck). Source: about 3 years ago
  • Is it possible to use a laptop as a stream deck?
    You can use MacroDeck for that. Works over the network, you'd open it in the browser of your Laptop. Cheers! :). Source: about 3 years ago
  • Just finished my budget stream deck!
    If you'r ein the market for something fully free - as in: No cost and open source - I can also recommend https://macrodeck.org/. Source: about 3 years ago
  • Open source StreamDeck alternative
    I know there are some alternative solutions that works with smartphones such as touch-portal and macrodeck but they have some things that I don't like. - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Codeship and Macro Deck, you can also consider the following products

Jenkins - Jenkins is an open-source continuous integration server with 300+ plugins to support all kinds of software development

TouchPortal - Touch Portal is a companion app to control a PC or a Mac by using a deck of buttons to improve the workflow & productivity of game streamers, content creators and professionals.

CircleCI - CircleCI gives web developers powerful Continuous Integration and Deployment with easy setup and maintenance.

Deckboard - Deckboard helps you create macros for Windows PC and launch them on your phone.

Travis CI - Simple, flexible, trustworthy CI/CD tools. Join hundreds of thousands who define tests and deployments in minutes, then scale up simply with parallel or multi-environment builds using Travis CIโ€™s precision syntaxโ€”all with the developer in mind.

MATRIC - Control PC applications via smarthone/tablet. Especially suitable for space/flightsims.

Loading...