Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

Codeship VS LocalXpose

Compare Codeship VS LocalXpose and see what are their differences

Codeship

Codeship is a fast and secure hosted Continuous Delivery platform that scales with your needs.

Rating
0 reviews
Alternatives Is it good?
LocalXpose

Your network without the IT work. Radically simple, always-on tunneling service for mission-critical applications.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Freemium $8 / Monthly (1 seat)
Alternatives Is it good?
PromptBrake
Automated AI security testing for agents, chatbots, and APIs. Find prompt injection, data leaks, and unsafe behavior before launch. sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, LocalXpose seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 16 times since March 2021.

social mentions
0 vs 16
Continuous Integration popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
240+ vs 121

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Codeship
LocalXpose
Website cloudbees.com localxpose.io
Pricing
Official pricing
Freemium $8 / Monthly (1 seat) Official pricing
Platforms —
Windows Mac OSX Linux
Company — Startup from the United States · 1 - 9 employees · 2019
Listed in
Continuous Integration DevOps Tools Continuous Deployment Mobile Continuous Integration +1
Localhost Tools Testing Webhooks Port Forwarding Load Balancer / Reverse Proxy Tunnel +3

About Codeship and LocalXpose

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

Codeship
LocalXpose

No description of Codeship yet.

LocalXpose is a SaaS reverse proxy solution that makes it incredibly easy to share any application running on your local network with the world, securely. LocalXpose removes the frustration of dealing with complex network configurations (NATs, firewalls) that typically prevent you from accessing...

Read more about LocalXpose

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Codeship 6 features
LocalXpose 13 features
  • Ease of Use
    Codeship offers an intuitive interface that simplifies the setup process, making it accessible for developers who may not be experienced with continuous integration (CI) and continuous deployment (CD) tools.
  • Integration with Cloud Services
    Codeship integrates seamlessly with cloud services such as AWS, Google Cloud, and Heroku, facilitating easy deployment of applications.
  • Flexible Workflows
    The tool provides support for both Codeship Basic and Codeship Pro, allowing for flexibility in choosing between a more straightforward or a more customizable CI/CD workflow.
  • Docker Support
    Codeship Pro offers extensive support for Docker, allowing developers to use containerization strategies for their build and deployment processes.
  • Parallel Test Pipelines
    It supports parallel test pipelines, which can significantly speed up the testing process and reduce build times.
  • Slack Integration
    Codeship integrates with communication tools like Slack, enabling notifications and updates directly within team communication channels.

Possible disadvantages

  • Cost
    Codeship can be more expensive compared to other CI/CD tools, particularly for larger teams or more complex projects that require more build resources.
  • Limited Customization
    For highly customized CI/CD processes, Codeship Basic might be limiting. Users may need to switch to Codeship Pro, which requires more configuration and a steeper learning curve.
  • Performance Bottlenecks
    Users have reported occasional performance bottlenecks, particularly under heavy workloads, which can slow down the CI/CD pipeline.
  • Plugin Ecosystem
    The plugin ecosystem for Codeship is not as extensive as some other CI/CD tools like Jenkins, potentially limiting its integration capabilities.
  • Learning Curve
    While Codeship Basic is relatively easy to use, Codeship Pro has a steeper learning curve, particularly for users who are new to Docker and advanced CI/CD practices.
  • Support
    Although support is available, some users have reported slower response times and less comprehensive support compared to other CI/CD platforms.
  • Connections
    Unlimited
  • Tunnels types
    HTTP/s, TLS, TCP and UDP
  • Active tunnels per seat
    10 tunnels
  • Custom domains
  • Custom endpoints
  • Request rate limiter
  • IP whitelisting
  • Edit request & response headers
  • Basic authentication
  • Key authentication
  • Built-in let's encrypt
  • Built-in file server
  • Multi Regions
    United states, Asia Pacific and Europe

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Codeship 2 videos + Add
LocalXpose 0 videos + Add

LinuxFest Northwest 2017: Continuous Delivery to Microsoft Azure with Docker through Codeship

More videos

  • - The Codeship -- Continuous Deployment made simple

No LocalXpose videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Codeship
LocalXpose
100% 100%
Continuous Integration
0% 0%
0% 0%
Localhost Tools
100% 100%
100% 100%
DevOps Tools
0% 0%
0% 0%
Testing
100% 100%

Questions & Answers

As answered by people managing Codeship and LocalXpose.

How would you describe the primary audience of your product?

LocalXpose's answer:

LocalXpose serves two main segments: (1) Full-stack developers who need reliable webhook testing and API development tools, and (2) B2B technology integrators managing distributed systems - particularly in restaurant POS, retail systems, industrial IoT, and building management. LocalXpose is built for technical teams at growing companies who need enterprise reliability without enterprise complexity.

What makes your product unique?

LocalXpose's answer:

LocalXpose provides managed tunneling infrastructure that bridges the gap between consumer-grade tools and enterprise complexity. LocalXpose offers production-ready tunneling with UDP support, custom domains, and white-label options, while maintaining the simplicity of setup that developers expect. Unlike self-hosted alternatives, LocalXpose handles all infrastructure, SSL certificates, and scaling automatically.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

LocalXpose's answer:

Choose LocalXpose if you need reliable tunneling without the operational overhead. LocalXpose is excellent for webhook testing, remote device management, and B2B integrations. Key advantages: production-ready from day one, UDP protocol support (rare among competitors), transparent pricing without usage surprises, and responsive founder-led support. Best fit for teams that need tunneling to work reliably without becoming networking experts.

What's the story behind your product?

LocalXpose's answer:

"LocalXpose was founded to solve a frustration we experienced firsthand: existing tunneling solutions were either too unreliable for production use or required extensive networking expertise to deploy. We built LocalXpose as the tunneling service we wished existed - powerful enough for production, simple enough to start using immediately, and backed by support from people who actually understand the technical challenges our customers face."

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

LocalXpose's answer:

LocalXpose runs on a distributed architecture using Go for high-performance tunnel servers, with automatic SSL certificate management via Let's Encrypt. The service supports multiple protocols including HTTP/HTTPS, TCP, and UDP (unique among major providers). The client application offers a GUI with request/response and webhook inspection tools, and supports enterprise features like custom domains and IP whitelisting.

Who are some of the biggest customers of your product?

LocalXpose's answer:

  • multi-location restaurant chains using LocalXpose for POS management
  • home automation and security products integrating on-site, cloud, and mobile applications
  • managed service providers (MSPs) in the retail POS industry
  • IoT platform providers connecting industrial equipment and facilities management applications
  • development teams at fast-growing SaaS companies testing payment integrations and webhook workflows

User comments

Share your experience with using Codeship and LocalXpose. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

Codeship no reviews yet
LocalXpose no reviews yet

View more

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Codeship 0 mentions
LocalXpose 16 mentions

Tracking Codeship since Mar 2021.

View more

Alternatives to Codeship and LocalXpose

When comparing Codeship and LocalXpose, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...