Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

CodeRunner VS Textastic

Compare CodeRunner VS Textastic and see what are their differences

CodeRunner logo CodeRunner

An advanced, highly flexible, and easy-to-use programming editor for your Mac.

Textastic logo Textastic

Textastic is a text, code, and markup editor for iPad and iPhone with support for syntax highlighting, FTP, SFTP, and Dropbox.
  • CodeRunner Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-22
  • Textastic Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-17

CodeRunner features and specs

  • Multi-language Support
    CodeRunner supports a wide range of programming languages, making it a versatile tool for developers who need to work with multiple syntaxes.
  • Lightweight and Fast
    The application is designed to be lightweight, which results in fast performance and quick startup times compared to more resource-intensive IDEs.
  • Customizable Features
    CodeRunner offers users the ability to highly customize their coding environment, from themes to shortcuts, enhancing user productivity and comfort.
  • Integrated Debugging Tools
    Comes with built-in debugging tools which aid in identifying and resolving coding errors more efficiently.

Possible disadvantages of CodeRunner

  • Limited Advanced Tools
    While it covers basics well, CodeRunner might lack some of the advanced tools and plugins available in more comprehensive IDEs.
  • MacOS Exclusive
    CodeRunner is only available for MacOS, which limits its accessibility for users on other operating systems like Windows or Linux.
  • Not Free
    The application is not free, requiring a purchase, which might be a barrier for some users considering it alongside free alternatives.
  • Less Community Support
    Due to its smaller user base compared to popular IDEs like Visual Studio Code, community support and plugins might be more limited.

Textastic features and specs

  • Wide Language Support
    Textastic supports syntax highlighting for more than 80 programming languages including HTML, CSS, JavaScript, Python, and PHP, making it versatile for diverse coding needs.
  • iOS Compatibility
    Designed specifically for Apple's ecosystem, Textastic offers a seamless coding experience on iPad and iPhone, providing portability and ease of use on mobile devices.
  • FTP and SFTP Integration
    Textastic allows users to connect to FTP, SFTP, and WebDAV servers, facilitating easy file uploads and downloads directly from within the app.
  • Code Auto-completion
    The app provides auto-completion features for various languages, enhancing productivity by reducing typing time for developers.
  • Customizable Themes
    Textastic allows customization of the editor’s appearance with themes, giving users the ability to create a comfortable visual environment for coding.

Possible disadvantages of Textastic

  • Limited Advanced Features
    Compared to more robust IDEs, Textastic lacks some advanced features such as integrated debugging tools and built-in support for version control systems like Git.
  • No Cross-Platform Availability
    Textastic is only available for iOS and macOS, limiting its use to Apple's platforms and restricting cross-platform workflows.
  • Paid Application
    Unlike some other text editors and IDEs that are free, Textastic requires a purchase, which might not be ideal for users looking for free coding solutions.
  • Learning Curve for Beginners
    While not overly complex, new users or beginner programmers might find it challenging to fully utilize all features due to a lack of in-depth tutorials.
  • Dependency on Apple Ecosystem
    Being a product tailored for Apple's ecosystem, it doesn’t cater to users on other platforms, limiting collaborative and cross-device coding experiences outside Apple devices.

CodeRunner videos

CGRundertow CODERUNNER for iPhone Video Game Review

More videos:

  • Review - CodeRunner - Review & Preview [Mac OS X Mavericks]
  • Review - Best Mac Developer Tool 2016 - CodeRunner 2 (Review)

Textastic videos

Textastic Mac & iOS Review

More videos:

  • Review - Textastic Review 2
  • Review - Textastic Code Editor - iPad App Review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to CodeRunner and Textastic)
Text Editors
51 51%
49% 49
IDE
48 48%
52% 52
Software Development
43 43%
57% 57
Productivity
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using CodeRunner and Textastic. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare CodeRunner and Textastic

CodeRunner Reviews

Top 10 Notepad++ Alternatives for Mac in 2022
Here we have discussed more Notedpad++ Mac alternatives. We discussed that it is actually not available on Mac. However, we have discussed different alternatives you can choose with your computer. These include Atom, Sunset Code, Brackets, BBEdit, SlickEdit, Komodo IDE, Coderunner, and Coda, among others. All of these have their own limitations, capabilities, and features,...
Source: www.imymac.com

Textastic Reviews

We have no reviews of Textastic yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, CodeRunner should be more popular than Textastic. It has been mentiond 4 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

CodeRunner mentions (4)

  • Simple compile and run?
    Https://coderunnerapp.com is a good lightweight alternative if you want to try out snippets of Swift code. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Xcode users how can I disable this blue line?
    BTW, if you're just start learning C++, get CodeRunner. Xcode is for project development, not a good learning tool. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Best IDE for C++ on M1 Mac
    I'm going to presage this by saying that if what you want from an IDE is that you can open a tab, tap in some C++, add some breakpoints if necessary and hit run, and if you're willing to spend $20, then I highly recommend CodeRunner. You can also set it up to invoke whatever you want to invoke for building, allowing you to use it as a full project-management IDE, but I usually don't bother with that. But it's... Source: almost 4 years ago
  • Your Username Story
    Mine is simple, probably wont win but I made this my username cause I like code, conuidentley coderunner is a program editor for macOS. Source: about 4 years ago

Textastic mentions (1)

  • Top 5 text editors for mobile in India 2021
    Textastic is a very popular text editor on IOS devices and it is from Alexander Blach. This text editor is has a lot of features and it supports more than 80 programming and markup languages including C++, C#, JavaScript, PHP, PERL, Java, HTML, CSS, XML, MARKDOWN, Objective-C, Swift, SQL, Python, Shell scripts etc for full list you can visit their website, you can connect your FTP, SFTP, SSH and WEBDAV servers to... - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing CodeRunner and Textastic, you can also consider the following products

VS Code - Build and debug modern web and cloud applications, by Microsoft

Sublime Text - Sublime Text is a sophisticated text editor for code, html and prose - any kind of text file. You'll love the slick user interface and extraordinary features. Fully customizable with macros, and syntax highlighting for most major languages.

SlickEdit - SlickEdit is a cross-platform, multi-language source code editor text editor that allows programmers to developer in over 40 languages on seven platforms.

Light Table - Light Table is a new interactive IDE that lets you modify running programs and embed anything from...

Buffer Editor - Buffer Editor is a POWERFUL code and text editor that lets you easily develop software, review code...

BBEdit - BBEdit is a professional HTML and text editor for Macintosh that provides features for editing, searching, and minipulation of text for web authors and software developers.