This creates Flutter's fundamental limitation: no code push capability. React Native developers can update JavaScript bundles at runtime through services like Microsoft's CodePush. Flutter's compiled Dart code is static machine code. There's no runtime interpreter in release builds. Once you publish an app, fixing bugs requires a full app store submission. That's typically 1-7 days for Apple review and hours to a... - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago

In my opinion it doesn't make any sense you can use https://microsoft.github.io/code-push/ which is free. I use this for my apps android/ios and works fine.. I hope it helps. Source: about 3 years ago

I come from smartphone app development and now moving to chrome extensions I miss something called CodePush which would push Javascript changes live to app store, but not native code so we could hot fix critical stuff without waiting for store reviews... Source: over 3 years ago

One feature I feel holding Flutter back compared to ReactNative and other options is Code Push. I really enjoy writing Flutter apps but the ability to push updates and bypass store reviews has been extremely valuable for multiple companies I've built apps for. https://microsoft.github.io/code-push/. - Source: Hacker News / over 4 years ago

Couldn't you just add the adults as testers to the Google Play app, avoiding oversight? The problem with breaking off from Google Play is you lose the ability to send push notifications. You could look at Code Push [0] for seamless updates. TBH its not the easiest to integrate with. [0] - https://microsoft.github.io/code-push/. - Source: Hacker News / over 4 years ago

Even Strapi needs to be hosted somewhere, and that usually involves a recurring fee. I've had great success over the past 2 years building blogs using http://webiny.com, and because they get low traffic, I've only ever had 1 bill from AWS that was around 80 cents US. Source: about 4 years ago

Strapi is awesome, I've been a fan of the project since its early days. However, I've been closely watching Webiny too. It's easier to host because you don't have to worry about running Docker containers or installing MongoDB on your local machine. Instead you put it on your AWS account (can be done with a few clicks), define your content models once it's there and you then only pay for usage. http://webiny.com. Source: over 4 years ago

Yeah I hear you, SAAS CMS platforms can get prohibitively expensive really quickly after the initial free tier expires. I've found hosting Strapi (or similar) on Heroku has saved me the cost of keeping a server instance running, which usually would cost $5-10 per month. However, the most cost effective for me so far has been Webiny. It's serverless so you install it on AWS and typically don't pay as much (if... Source: over 4 years ago

Otherwise if you want a framework to build on, there's Redwood (which works particularly well on Netlify and Vercel) or Webiny (for AWS, Azure and others). - Source: dev.to / almost 5 years ago