CodePush Reviews

Vue Reviews

1. Alan

   · CEO at Self employeed · almost 4 years ago
   VUE A-Z

   I became a VUE artist, when VUE 5 was released, and eventually went up the ladder to V.15 Complete. And , where I got tired of waiting hours, to create that "Perfect picture." And , why VUE failed miserably as an animation tool. VUE, for all it's improvements and changes, was basically stuck in the 90's, and still using the archaic frame building architecture found in WINDOWS . AVI. . IF , I wanted to animate anything, IT was going to be limited, and a VERY slow process. I.E. A two minute Ocean Sim, would take days to render, and the output, at best. COOL. but, with the brutally long, render times; IT basically became an expensive, worthless tool.

   Would I still recommend this for beginners? - YES, for the simple reason, it introduces them 3-D modeling, and scene development. IT'S also a good tool for matte artists, because creating a simple PHOTO REAL background ,takes very little time.

   OVER the years, though, I found the software, was real flakey, and prone to crashing. SO, in the end, I simply got tired of the nonsense, and moved on. I USE UNREAL 5 now, and it's a totally different world. I can create, and a fully animated scene, in a matter of minutes... and in full 3D , and with pre-animated objects. IT was game changer.

   SO, final words? I would give VUE a plug , for ease of use, and stunning photo real output, but, would not be my choice for an animation solution. Just, by it's design.

   I simply had too many bad experiences with the software. I hope the company focuses more on system stability, instead of adding MORE tweaks. MY assessment of V6.I , was very mixed. IT crashed constantly, yet, eventually was stable enough to use. V.9 , compete was an amazing program, and that's where E-ON got it right. Where they got it wrong, was the product was NOT affordable for the average user, and was also a factor; in me dropping the platform.

   🏁 Competitors: Unreal Engine

   👍 Pros:    Easy to use

CodePush mentions (6)

• A Deep Look at the Flutter SDK: What's Actually Under the Hood

  This creates Flutter's fundamental limitation: no code push capability. React Native developers can update JavaScript bundles at runtime through services like Microsoft's CodePush. Flutter's compiled Dart code is static machine code. There's no runtime interpreter in release builds. Once you publish an app, fixing bugs requires a full app store submission. That's typically 1-7 days for Apple review and hours to a... - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago

• Searching: react native ota update self hosted

  In my opinion it doesn't make any sense you can use https://microsoft.github.io/code-push/ which is free. I use this for my apps android/ios and works fine.. I hope it helps. Source: about 3 years ago

• Hot fixes on Chrome Extension live

  I come from smartphone app development and now moving to chrome extensions I miss something called CodePush which would push Javascript changes live to app store, but not native code so we could hot fix critical stuff without waiting for store reviews... Source: over 3 years ago

• All you should know about Flutter development

  One feature I feel holding Flutter back compared to ReactNative and other options is Code Push. I really enjoy writing Flutter apps but the ability to push updates and bypass store reviews has been extremely valuable for multiple companies I've built apps for. https://microsoft.github.io/code-push/. - Source: Hacker News / over 4 years ago

• Ask HN: Robust and affordable alternatives to Google Play for app distribution?

  Couldn't you just add the adults as testers to the Google Play app, avoiding oversight? The problem with breaking off from Google Play is you lose the ability to send push notifications. You could look at Code Push [0] for seamless updates. TBH its not the easiest to integrate with. [0] - https://microsoft.github.io/code-push/. - Source: Hacker News / over 4 years ago

Vue mentions (1)

• More of my AMIGA coverdisks magazines

  It says right there: "Play God with the ultimate landscape generator" and that's what it did. You generate a random terrain, mould it to how you want it, set the levels of trees, water, grass, type of sky etc, set the camera position, and then it would render it for you. These days there are many more options: Terragen, Vue, World Machine, World Creator, Instant Terra, Bryce. Source: about 5 years ago