This creates Flutter's fundamental limitation: no code push capability. React Native developers can update JavaScript bundles at runtime through services like Microsoft's CodePush. Flutter's compiled Dart code is static machine code. There's no runtime interpreter in release builds. Once you publish an app, fixing bugs requires a full app store submission. That's typically 1-7 days for Apple review and hours to a... - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago

In my opinion it doesn't make any sense you can use https://microsoft.github.io/code-push/ which is free. I use this for my apps android/ios and works fine.. I hope it helps. Source: about 3 years ago

I come from smartphone app development and now moving to chrome extensions I miss something called CodePush which would push Javascript changes live to app store, but not native code so we could hot fix critical stuff without waiting for store reviews... Source: over 3 years ago

One feature I feel holding Flutter back compared to ReactNative and other options is Code Push. I really enjoy writing Flutter apps but the ability to push updates and bypass store reviews has been extremely valuable for multiple companies I've built apps for. https://microsoft.github.io/code-push/. - Source: Hacker News / over 4 years ago

Couldn't you just add the adults as testers to the Google Play app, avoiding oversight? The problem with breaking off from Google Play is you lose the ability to send push notifications. You could look at Code Push [0] for seamless updates. TBH its not the easiest to integrate with. [0] - https://microsoft.github.io/code-push/. - Source: Hacker News / over 4 years ago

When a team moves from a monolith into microservices and event-driven, asynchronous systems, it inherits a class of problems that used to be someone else's: work that fails halfway through, steps that must not run twice, calls that return before the work is done. Temporal is a durable execution engine that handles a lot of this - you define a multi-step process, and it guarantees the process runs to completion... - Source: dev.to / 14 days ago

Durable execution — the pattern implemented by Temporal, Inngest, Rivet Actors, and now Cloudflare Workflows — treats waiting as a continuation rather than a loop:. - Source: dev.to / 20 days ago

Two specific moves stand out in Duncan's account. The first is durable execution, via Temporal — Mercury replaced fragile cron-and-database state machines with workflow code whose failure semantics are platform-handled (replay, retry, timeout, cancellation). Mercury open-sourced its hs-temporal-sdk, which wraps Temporal's official Rust Core SDK via FFI and provides a Haskell-native API. The dovetail with Haskell's... - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago

We picked Temporal as the first reference engine on purpose. Temporal has the strictest execution model we know of – a V8 sandbox, determinism constraints, replay-driven recovery. If our port contract holds up against that, easier engines – an in-memory test double, a BullMQ queue, or JSON-first platforms like Inngest or Restate – plug in through the same two interfaces. We're shipping Temporal first; the rest is... - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago

The trick is to find whatever metadata channel the queue already gives you and use that and thankfully, almost every mature queue has one (probably because of this scenario). SQS has message attributes, Temporal has context propagators built into the SDK, and Hatchet (which we use to run our workflows) has a metadata field called additionalMetadata. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago