Software Alternatives & Reviews

CodeKit VS Parcel

Compare CodeKit VS Parcel and see what are their differences

CodeKit logo CodeKit

CodeKit allows you to optimize the performance of your website by automatically and efficiently compiling a variety of popular languages.

Parcel logo Parcel

Blazing fast, zero configuration web application bundler
  • CodeKit Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-12
  • Parcel Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-12-13

CodeKit videos

CodeKit Basics - How to Setup a Project & Pre Process CSS

More videos:

  • Review - CodeKit Overview
  • Review - CodeKit — GIVEAWAY + Features

Parcel videos

Danby Parcel Guard Smart Mailbox blogger Review

More videos:

  • Review - PARCEL MOVIE REVIEW | SASWATA CHATTERJEE | RITUPARNA SENGUPTA | RUPAM'S REVIEW
  • Review - Le Parcel Box review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to CodeKit and Parcel)
Image Optimisation
100 100%
0% 0
Web Application Bundler
0 0%
100% 100
Developer Tools
61 61%
39% 39
JS Build Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using CodeKit and Parcel. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare CodeKit and Parcel

CodeKit Reviews

We have no reviews of CodeKit yet.
Be the first one to post

Parcel Reviews

Rollup v. Webpack v. Parcel
Parcel's caching feature sees dramatically decreases in time consumption after the initial run. For frequent, small changes, in smaller projects **Parcel*8 is a great choice.
Source: x-team.com
If you’ve ever configured Webpack, Parcel will blow your mind!
document.body.className = document.body.className.replace(/(^|\s)is-noJs(\s|$)/, "$1is-js$2")HomepageHomepageJavascriptBecome a memberSign inGet startedIf you’ve ever configured Webpack, Parcel will blow your mind!And how to hit the ground running with Parcel.Ibrahim ButtBlockedUnblockFollowFollowingMar 16, 2018Click here to share this article on LinkedIn »Zero...
Source: medium.com
First impressions with Parcel JS
The big selling point of Parcel though is that it offers a zero configuration experience. This means all the features are available out of the box! It also boasts blazing fast bundle times 👟 You won’t be configuring how Parcel works or having to draft in various plugins to get started. If you do need something, Parcel magically detects this and will pull in stuff for you on...
Source: codeburst.io
Parcel vs webpack - Jakob Lind
Parcel has made their own benchmarks of Parcel and other bundlers. Parcel has been criticized because they have not made the benchmarks open source. People cannot verify that the benchmarks are true when they are not open source.

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Parcel seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 101 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

CodeKit mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of CodeKit yet. Tracking of CodeKit recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Parcel mentions (101)

  • DEMO - Voice to PDF - Complete PDF documents with voice commands using the Claude 3 Opus API
    It runs using Parcel, very simple and easy to setup. The app has 3 files:. - Source: dev.to / 2 days ago
  • React Server Components Example with Next.js
    In the Changelog Podcast episode referenced above, Dan Abramov alluded to Parcel working on RSC support as well. I couldn’t find much to back up that claim aside from a GitHub issue discussing directives and a social media post by Devon Govett (creator of Parcel), so I can’t say for sure if Parcel is currently a viable option for developing with RSCs. - Source: dev.to / 14 days ago
  • Build a Vite 5 backend integration with Flask
    Once you build a simple Vite backend integration, try not to complicate Vite's configuration unless you absolutely must. Vite has become one of the most popular bundlers in the frontend space, but it wasn't the first and it certainly won't be the last. In my 7 years of building for the web, I've used Grunt, Gulp, Webpack, esbuild, and Parcel. Snowpack and Rome came-and-went before I ever had a chance to try them.... - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • Building Node.js applications without dependencies
    I’ve tried something similar on the frontend side: I decided to build a UI for Ollama.ai using only HTML, CSS, and JS (Single-Page Application). The goal is to learn something new and have zero runtime dependencies on other projects and NPM modules. Only Node and Parcel.js (https://parceljs.org/) are needed during development for serving files, bundling, etc. The only runtime dependency is a modern browser. Here's... - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • 11 Ways to Optimize Your Website
    Besides Webpack, there are many other popular web bundlers available, such as Parcel, Esbuild, Rollup, and more. They all have their own unique features and strengths, and you should make your decision based on the needs and requirements of your specific project. Please refer to their official websites for details. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing CodeKit and Parcel, you can also consider the following products

ImageOptim - Faster web pages and apps.

Webpack - Webpack is a module bundler. Its main purpose is to bundle JavaScript files for usage in a browser, yet it is also capable of transforming, bundling, or packaging just about any resource or asset.

Node.js - Node.js is a platform built on Chrome's JavaScript runtime for easily building fast, scalable network applications

17track - All-in-one package tracking

Ruby on Rails - Ruby on Rails is an open source full-stack web application framework for the Ruby programming...

rollup.js - Rollup is a module bundler for JavaScript which compiles small pieces of code into a larger piece such as application.