Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

CodeIgniter VS MEAN

Compare CodeIgniter VS MEAN and see what are their differences

CodeIgniter

A Fully Baked PHP Framework

Rating
5.0 · 1 review
Pricing
Open source
Alternatives Is it good?
MEAN

A Simple, Scalable and Easy starting point for full stack javascript web development

Rating
0 reviews
Alternatives Is it good?
ReleasePad
Changelog software that turns GitHub commits into release notes your users actually see — inside your app. Built for founders and teams who ship fast. sponsored

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, CodeIgniter seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 12 times since March 2021.

social mentions
12 vs 0
Web Frameworks popularity
95% vs 5%
alternatives listed
238 vs 114

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

CodeIgniter
MEAN
Website codeigniter.com github.com
Pricing
Open source
—
Listed in
PHP Web Framework Web Frameworks Frameworks (Full Stack) Developer Tools +1
Web Frameworks Developer Tools Python Web Framework PHP MVC Framework +1

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

CodeIgniter 7 features
MEAN 5 features
  • Performance
    CodeIgniter is known for its exceptional performance and fast execution, which is beneficial for applications requiring quick load times.
  • Documentation
    CodeIgniter offers comprehensive and clear documentation, making it easier for developers to understand and use the framework effectively.
  • Easy to Learn
    CodeIgniter's simple and straightforward syntax makes it relatively easy for beginners to learn and start developing applications quickly.
  • Lightweight
    The framework is lightweight and does not impose many dependencies or require a specific server environment, providing flexibility to developers.
  • Community Support
    CodeIgniter has a strong and active community, which means plenty of resources, forums, and add-ons are available for developers.
  • Built-in Security Features
    CodeIgniter comes with built-in security features like XSS filtering and CSRF protection, helping developers to secure their applications with minimal effort.
  • MVC Architecture
    The framework follows the Model-View-Controller (MVC) architecture, promoting clean code separation and better organization of the project.

Possible disadvantages

  • Lack of Modern Features
    CodeIgniter does not include many modern features found in other frameworks, such as built-in ORM or out-of-the-box RESTful API support.
  • Limited Modular Extensions
    It has fewer modular extensions compared to other frameworks like Laravel or Symfony, which can limit code reusability and scalability.
  • Manual Routing
    Routing in CodeIgniter is somewhat manual and less intuitive compared to other frameworks that offer more automatic and flexible routing mechanisms.
  • Outdated PHP Practices
    Some of the practices and conventions in CodeIgniter are considered outdated with respect to modern PHP development trends.
  • No Built-in Authentication
    CodeIgniter does not come with a built-in authentication system, requiring developers to implement their own or use third-party libraries.
  • Less Emphasis on Testing
    CodeIgniter has less built-in support and emphasis on unit testing compared to other frameworks like Laravel, making it harder to implement TDD or BDD.
  • Lack of Native Composer Support
    The framework's native support for Composer, PHP's dependency manager, is not as robust as other modern frameworks, which can complicate dependency management.
  • Full JavaScript Stack
    The MEAN stack uses JavaScript for both client-side and server-side development, creating a more unified and cohesive development environment.
  • Open-Source
    All components of the MEAN stack are open-source and have large, active communities that contribute to continuous improvement and support.
  • Scalability
    MEAN stack applications can be easily scaled by distributing the load across multiple servers and databases, especially MongoDB, which is designed for horizontal scaling.
  • JSON Natively
    Data flows seamlessly in JSON format, which makes it easier to work with NoSQL databases like MongoDB and allows for a consistent data format across the stack.
  • Rapid Development
    MEAN stack simplifies the development process, enabling rapid prototyping and faster iterations due to its non-blocking architecture and well-integrated tools.

Possible disadvantages

  • Immaturity
    Some MEAN stack technologies, particularly Angular and MongoDB, are relatively new and may not be as mature or stable as established alternatives.
  • Callback Hell
    JavaScript is an asynchronous programming language, and excessive use of callbacks can make the code more difficult to read and maintain, often referred to as 'callback hell'.
  • Performance Bottlenecks
    While efficient for many use-cases, Node.js' single-threaded nature can be a limitation for CPU-intensive tasks, potentially leading to performance bottlenecks.
  • Tooling Diversity
    The plethora of available tools and frameworks within the MEAN ecosystem can be overwhelming and may cause inconsistencies if not chosen and managed carefully.
  • Security Concerns
    Using MongoDB's flexible schema can lead to unintentional vulnerabilities if input validation and authorization are not handled properly.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

CodeIgniter
MEAN

Overall verdict

  • Yes, CodeIgniter is a good choice for developers looking for a simple and efficient PHP framework. It's particularly well-suited for projects where performance is a priority, and extensive feature sets found in larger frameworks are not necessary.

Why this product is good

  • CodeIgniter is considered a good PHP framework because it is lightweight, easy to set up, and requires minimal server resources. It offers a straightforward approach to building web applications, especially for developers who appreciate simplicity and performance. Its comprehensive documentation and active community support are additional positives.

Recommended for

  • Developers who need a lightweight and fast framework
  • Projects with straightforward requirements and simplistic architectures
  • Developers who prefer a framework with easy installation and minimal configuration
  • Smaller projects or prototypes that require rapid development
  • Projects with limited server resources

Overall verdict

  • MEAN is a good choice for developers who are comfortable with JavaScript and want to use the same language across their entire development process. It offers great flexibility, scalability, and a modern approach to web development.

Why this product is good

  • The MEAN stack, which stands for MongoDB, Express.js, Angular, and Node.js, is a popular full-stack JavaScript framework for building dynamic web applications. It allows developers to write both client-side and server-side code in JavaScript, providing a consistent and efficient workflow. MongoDB, a NoSQL database, offers flexible and scalable data storage, while Express.js provides a robust web server framework. Angular, a powerful front-end framework, enables the creation of dynamic user interfaces, and Node.js allows server-side scripting that can handle many connections simultaneously.

Recommended for

  • Developers looking to use a single language (JavaScript) for both client and server-side development.
  • Projects requiring high scalability and flexibility, such as real-time applications.
  • Teams familiar with or willing to learn modern JavaScript frameworks and concepts.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

CodeIgniter 3 videos + Add
MEAN 2 videos + Add

PHP CodeIgniter tutorial: What is CodeIgniter and why should I use it? | lynda.com

More videos

  • - Laravel vs Codeigniter - A quick comparison for you to decide
  • - Review Codeigniter 4

What is REVIEW? What does REVIEW mean? REVIEW meaning - REVIEW definition - How to pronounce REVIEW?

More videos

  • - Mean Creek (2004) - Movie Review | Best Movies You've Never Seen

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
CodeIgniter
MEAN
95% 95%
Web Frameworks
5% 5%
89% 89%
Developer Tools
11% 11%
90% 90%
Python Web Framework
10% 10%
100% 100%
PHP MVC Framework
0% 0%

User comments

Share your experience with using CodeIgniter and MEAN. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

CodeIgniter 5.0 · 1 review
MEAN no reviews yet

View more

We have no reviews of MEAN yet. Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

CodeIgniter 12 mentions
MEAN 0 mentions
  • CodeIgniter Tutorial for Beginners: Build Powerful PHP Web Applications Fast
    Step 1: Download CodeIgniter from the official website (https://codeigniter.com/). Step 2: Extract it into your web server’s root directory (e.g., htdocs or www). Step 3: Configure the base_url in application/config/config.php. Step... - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
  • CodeIgniter Made Simple: Develop Powerful Web Applications
    Visit the official website: https://codeigniter.com and download the latest version of CodeIgniter. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • 19+ Laravel Best Practices for Developers in 2024
    For history's sake, you should know that Laravel was built in place of the CodeIgniter framework as a modern replacement because the CodeIgniter framework missing important core features such as built-in support for user authentication... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

View more

Tracking MEAN since Mar 2021.

Alternatives to CodeIgniter and MEAN

When comparing CodeIgniter and MEAN, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...