Codecov Reviews

Babel Reviews

Codecov mentions (18)

• To Review or Not to Review: The Debate on Mandatory Code Reviews

  If you're actively testing your codebase, which I hope you are, consider integrating a code coverage automatic checker such as codecov. This tool can alert if the coverage drops below a threshold. While I've had positive experiences with such tools, it's worth mentioning that the adoption process may pose some challenges. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago

• DevOps CI/CD Quick Start Guide with GitHub Actions 🛠️🐙⚡️

  The code coverage is printed out in the Coverage Report step but it is useful to track code coverage over time and have a repository badge which shows the current coverage percentage. There are many different code coverage and testing applications but we will use CodeCov. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago

• Build an Open Source Project: Behind the Scenes

  Usually, you can't build a product without using various tools. Some of them can be free, and some of them can be commercial. The great benefit of working on Open Source projects is that a lot of companies with commercial products have special offers for non-commercial development. In the case of the "xq" utility, which is written in Go, I use GoLand IDE by JetBrains. I paid for it for several months but later... - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago

• CI CD strategies for UI apps and deployed services

  This YAML file details the CI implementation, including combined code coverage with CodeCov. For a simpler example without Cypress parallelization and code coverage, check the Github Actions YAML file of this template. The ideas presented here can be applied to any front-end application. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago

• Almost 1000 applications this year, still no job.

  High unit-test coverage, and automated coverage reports on your repo by something like Codecov. Source: over 1 year ago

Babel mentions (135)

• The Basics of BABEL

  Also if you are interested in what trans compiled code looks like, head to this site that will transcompile anything given to it. https://babeljs.io/. - Source: dev.to / 1 day ago

• How, and why, you should add JavaScript linting to your project. With ESLint and Gulp

  Some of the most popular JavaScript linting tools are ESLint, JSHint, JSLint and JSCS. We're going to be using ESLint. It’s very flexible, easy to use and has the best ES6 support, which will be helpful if we introduce more modern JavaScript (that will be transpiled for older browsers using https://babeljs.io/). All rules for ESLint can be found here: https://eslint.org/docs/rules/. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago

• What is Server Side Rendering (SSR) and Static Site Generation (SSG)?

  This simply extends the existing build process that many front-end frameworks have. After Babel's done with its transpilation, it merely executes code to compile your initial screen into static HTML and CSS. This isn't entirely dissimilar from how SSR hydrates your initial screen, but it's done at compile-time, not at request time. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago

• Storybook 8 Beta

  First, we switched the default compiler for new projects from Babel to SWC (Speedy Web Compiler). SWC is dramatically faster than Babel and requires zero configuration. We’ll continue to support Babel in any project currently using it. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago

• Nuxt vs Next: Which JavaScript Framework Suits Your Next Project?

  Nuxt.js is an open-source JavaScript framework built on Vue.js, Node.js, Vite, and Babel.js used for creating fast, cutting-edge applications. Nuxt.js possesses similar features to Next.js, with the major difference being the web framework it is compatible with. Next.js is a React framework whereas Nuxt.js is a Vue framework. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago