CodeClimate VS Parcel
Compare CodeClimate VS Parcel and see what are their differences
The PAQATO After-Sales Experience Platform is the growth driver that makes online stores successful for tomorrow.
featured
CodeClimate
SonarQube
Codacy
ESLint
CodeFactor.io
Coveralls
SensioLabs Insight
Source Insight
Parcel
Webpack
17track
rollup.js
AfterShip
Vite
esbuild
Grunt
CodeClimate ParcelBased on our record, Parcel should be more popular than CodeClimate. It has been mentiond 102 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Codeclimate.com — Automated code review, free for Open Source and unlimited organisation-owned private repos (up to 4 collaborators). Also free for students and institutions. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Want to know how to enforce allowing only high-quality software into production? Check out this post on how to use CodeClimate can help you do just that! #DevOps #SoftwareDeveloper #softwaredevelopment #SoftwareEngineering #webdevelopment #codequality. Source: almost 2 years ago
Ideally, software can quickly go from development to production. Continuous deployment and delivery are some processes that make this possible. Continuous deployment means establishing an automated pipeline from development to production while continuous delivery means maintaining the main branch in a deployable state so that a deployment can be requested at any time. Predecos uses these tools. When a commit goes... - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
The new code should not drop existing code coverage I've found in practice mainly catches changes to existing code that lack proper updates to existing tests. Our company uses Code Climate for these checks, so we don't have to manage / write our own tooling for this purpose. Source: over 2 years ago
TL;DR: Using static analysis tools helps by giving objective ways to improve code quality and keeps your code maintainable. You can add static analysis tools to your CI build to fail when it finds code smells. Its main selling points over plain linting are the ability to inspect quality in the context of multiple files (e.g. Detect duplications), perform advanced analysis (e.g. Code complexity), and follow the... - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
At first we wanted to just get rid of all the helper utilities. Keep only the kernel, but this would mean a loss of backward compatibility. We needed some efficient code processing instead with recomposition and tree-shaking. We needed a bundler. But which one? Our testing approach relies on targets, not sources. We rebuilt the project frequently, speed was critical requirement. In essence, we chose a solution... - Source: dev.to / 6 days ago
It runs using Parcel, very simple and easy to setup. The app has 3 files:. - Source: dev.to / 13 days ago
In the Changelog Podcast episode referenced above, Dan Abramov alluded to Parcel working on RSC support as well. I couldn’t find much to back up that claim aside from a GitHub issue discussing directives and a social media post by Devon Govett (creator of Parcel), so I can’t say for sure if Parcel is currently a viable option for developing with RSCs. - Source: dev.to / 25 days ago
Once you build a simple Vite backend integration, try not to complicate Vite's configuration unless you absolutely must. Vite has become one of the most popular bundlers in the frontend space, but it wasn't the first and it certainly won't be the last. In my 7 years of building for the web, I've used Grunt, Gulp, Webpack, esbuild, and Parcel. Snowpack and Rome came-and-went before I ever had a chance to try them.... - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
I’ve tried something similar on the frontend side: I decided to build a UI for Ollama.ai using only HTML, CSS, and JS (Single-Page Application). The goal is to learn something new and have zero runtime dependencies on other projects and NPM modules. Only Node and Parcel.js (https://parceljs.org/) are needed during development for serving files, bundling, etc. The only runtime dependency is a modern browser. Here's... - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
SonarQube - SonarQube, a core component of the Sonar solution, is an open source, self-managed tool that systematically helps developers and organizations deliver Clean Code.
Webpack - Webpack is a module bundler. Its main purpose is to bundle JavaScript files for usage in a browser, yet it is also capable of transforming, bundling, or packaging just about any resource or asset.
Codacy - Automatically reviews code style, security, duplication, complexity, and coverage on every change while tracking code quality throughout your sprints.
17track - All-in-one package tracking
ESLint - The fully pluggable JavaScript code quality tool
rollup.js - Rollup is a module bundler for JavaScript which compiles small pieces of code into a larger piece such as application.