CodeClimate
Codacy
SonarQube
ESLint
CodeFactor.io
Coveralls
SensioLabs Insight
Source-Navigator NG
giscus
DISQUS
utterances
ReplyBox
Cusdis
Hyvor Talk
FastComments
HTML Comment Box
CodeClimateNo giscus videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
Based on our record, giscus should be more popular than CodeClimate. It has been mentiond 33 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Automated analysis tools: SonarQube, CodeClimate, and Codacy detect code-level debt automatically: cyclomatic complexity, code duplication, dependency staleness, and coverage gaps. These tools supplement but don't replace the architectural and business-logic debt that requires human judgment to identify and document. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
CodeClimate and Codacy can generate before/after metrics for code quality that make the starting and ending states concrete rather than subjective. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
CodeClimate quantifies maintainability so teams can’t hand-wave garbage away. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
Code Climate: Link - Automated code review and quality analysis for codebase health. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
Use tools like SonarQube or CodeClimate to spot the high-risk 20%. Then fix one thing at a time not everything at once. This isn’t Dark Souls. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Maybe giscus https://giscus.app/ It works for static sites, you just need to embed their script, and spam and moderation would be handled by GitHub. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
Look the bottom of that page: An error occurred: API rate limit already exceeded for installation ID 73591946. Error from https://giscus.app/ Fellow says one thing and uses another. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
I did the same. I was sad to lose the comments, but the ads were awful and I don't particularly want someone elses ads / tracking on my hobby site. I switched to gisqus [1], which is powered by GitHub discussions, which seems to be working ok. (The site is hosted on GH pages so seems reasonable to also use GH discussions for the comments.) [1] https://giscus.app/. - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
3) No commenting feature, luckily I found your post here on HN. But it would be better to have comment blocks, like from https://giscus.app/ or just a link where readers can comment. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
If you're a developer, you might start by using a static site generator and GitHub Pages. Stick to Markdown and start collecting and writing stuff. Sooner or later you'll get comments and regular readers. Then you might start to add editing or simply give other people access to GitHub. The editing experience of Markdown files in GitHub is not too bad and you get started in no time. From my experience it's more... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
Codacy - Automatically reviews code style, security, duplication, complexity, and coverage on every change while tracking code quality throughout your sprints.
DISQUS - Disqus is a global comment system that improves discussion on websites and connects conversations across the web.
SonarQube - SonarQube, a core component of the Sonar solution, is an open source, self-managed tool that systematically helps developers and organizations deliver Clean Code.
utterances - A lightweight comments widget built on GitHub issues.
ESLint - The fully pluggable JavaScript code quality tool
ReplyBox - ReplyBox, a simple, honest comment system. No ads, no dodgy affiliate links, no fluff.