CodeClimate
Codacy
SonarQube
ESLint
CodeFactor.io
Coveralls
SensioLabs Insight
Source-Navigator NG
Exstats
ChromeStats
ExtPose
Extension Ranker
CRX4Chrome
CRX Extractor
AppBrain
Chrome Winner
Most browser extension developers ship the same product to Chrome, Edge, and Firefox, then try to track its performance across three separate developer dashboards, three different review feeds, and three sets of keyword rankings. The data is fragmented, history is short, and there is no easy way to compare a release against a competitor over time.
Exstats fixes this by grouping the Chrome, Edge, and Firefox versions of an extension into one product view, alongside the competitors you want to watch. It tracks daily changes in installs, ratings, reviews, category rank, and search rank, then keeps up to a full year of history so weekly and monthly trends are visible at a glance. Email and Slack alerts fire on rating drops, rank shifts, and competitor updates so a regression does not sit unnoticed for a week.
Beyond your own products, the Extension Explorer indexes 360,000+ extensions with 30+ searchable fields and exportable CSV or XLSX, the Keyword Tracker suggests AI-generated keyword ideas and tracks rank by store, and the Store Trends dashboard reports category growth, rating distributions, and review activity across each store.
CodeClimate ExstatsNo Exstats videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
Exstats's answer:
Exstats treats an extension as one product across stores, not as three separate listings on three sites. The Chrome, Edge, and Firefox versions sit in one row, and history, reviews, alerts, and competitor data flow from there.
Exstats's answer:
Exstats started because developers shipping browser extensions kept running into the same wall. The Chrome Web Store, Edge Add-ons, and Firefox Add-ons each give publishers a siloed view with short history, no competitor data, and no way to compare a release against a rival over time. Teams that maintained extensions on more than one store ended up checking three dashboards a day and keeping competitor numbers in spreadsheets. We built Exstats so an extension and its store versions live in one place, with daily history, alerts, and competitor tracking built in.
Exstats's answer:
Unified multi-browser view. Exstats is the only dashboard that groups the Chrome, Edge, and Firefox versions of an extension into one product, with shared history and shared alerts. Most analytics tools cover only the Chrome Web Store, or split the three stores across separate sites.
Full year of daily history. Stores show current numbers and a short trail. Exstats keeps daily snapshots for up to a year so weekly and monthly trends, rating regressions, and competitor launches are visible at a glance.
Reviews from every store in one table. Chrome, Edge, and Firefox reviews sit in one sortable, filterable table, so a developer can read a week of feedback without rotating between three dashboards.
Keyword tracking with AI suggestions. Search rank is tracked per store with daily change indicators, and the keyword tool suggests new keywords from competitor listings rather than expecting the developer to bring a complete list.
Exstats's answer:
Exstats is built for the people shipping and growing browser extensions.
The core audience is independent extension developers and small product teams who need one place to watch installs, ratings, reviews, and keyword rank for their extensions, on whichever stores they publish to.
A second audience is extension growth and marketing specialists who track competitor launches, rating shifts, and category trends on behalf of clients and need a single view across Chrome, Edge, and Firefox rather than three separate workflows.
A third audience is product and engineering teams at companies whose extension is a meaningful acquisition or retention surface, who need daily alerts, exportable data, and API access for internal dashboards.
Based on our record, CodeClimate seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 19 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Automated analysis tools: SonarQube, CodeClimate, and Codacy detect code-level debt automatically: cyclomatic complexity, code duplication, dependency staleness, and coverage gaps. These tools supplement but don't replace the architectural and business-logic debt that requires human judgment to identify and document. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
CodeClimate and Codacy can generate before/after metrics for code quality that make the starting and ending states concrete rather than subjective. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
CodeClimate quantifies maintainability so teams canโt hand-wave garbage away. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
Code Climate: Link - Automated code review and quality analysis for codebase health. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
Use tools like SonarQube or CodeClimate to spot the high-risk 20%. Then fix one thing at a time not everything at once. This isnโt Dark Souls. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Codacy - Automatically reviews code style, security, duplication, complexity, and coverage on every change while tracking code quality throughout your sprints.
ChromeStats - Compare and analyze Chrome extensions and Android Apps
SonarQube - SonarQube, a core component of the Sonar solution, is an open source, self-managed tool that systematically helps developers and organizations deliver Clean Code.
ExtPose - Optimize your Chrome extension to get more installs
ESLint - The fully pluggable JavaScript code quality tool
Extension Ranker - Boost your Chrome Extension ranking with the help of Extension Ranker โ driving more impressions, installs, and sustainable user growth.
