Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

CodeBottle VS Measure.sh

Compare CodeBottle VS Measure.sh and see what are their differences

CodeBottle

MIT-licensed reusable code snippets

Rating
0 reviews
Alternatives Is it good?
Measure.sh

Measure helps mobile teams monitor and fix crashes, ANRs, bugs, and performance issues. The open source alternative to Firebase Crashlytics.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source Freemium Free trial $25 / Monthly (25GB of log/metric/ traces/session replay)
Alternatives Is it good?
HTMLCSS to Image API
Capture website screenshots, render HTML/CSS, or create templated graphics. Render images or PDFs. Use MCP with AI, no-code automation, or the REST API. No browsers needed. sponsored

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, CodeBottle seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 1 time since March 2021.

social mentions
1 vs 0
Productivity popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
108 vs 9

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

CodeBottle
Measure.sh
Website codebottle.io measure.sh
Pricing —
Open source Freemium Free trial $25 / Monthly (25GB of log/metric/ traces/session replay) Official pricing
Platforms —
React Native Android iOS Flutter Kotlin Multiplatform +2
Company — Startup from the United States · 1 - 9 employees · 2024
Listed in
Developer Tools Productivity Tech Web App +1
Observability APM Error Monitoring Mobile Analytics Bug Reporting User Monitoring Monitoring Tools Developer Tools Error Tracking Exception Monitoring Crash Reporting +8

About CodeBottle and Measure.sh

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

CodeBottle
Measure.sh

No description of CodeBottle yet.

Measure is an open source mobile observability platform built for production debugging. It helps mobile teams find and fix crashes, ANRs, UI freezes, slow API chains and edge-case state bugs, the failures that crash reporters never show you. Most crash tools tell you that an app broke. Measure...

Read more about Measure.sh

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

CodeBottle 4 features
Measure.sh 8 features
  • User-Friendly Interface
    CodeBottle offers an intuitive and easy-to-navigate interface, which makes it accessible for developers of all skill levels. The streamlined layout and design help users to quickly find the tools and resources they need.
  • Integration with Popular Tools
    The platform provides seamless integration with widely-used development and version control tools, such as GitHub and GitLab, enabling users to effortlessly manage their code projects across multiple platforms.
  • Collaboration Features
    CodeBottle includes robust collaboration features that allow teams to work together in real-time on code projects. This promotes effective communication and coordination among team members, enhancing productivity.
  • Code Snippet Sharing
    Users can easily share code snippets with others, facilitating code reuse and knowledge sharing within the development community. This feature helps in speeding up the development process.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited Language Support
    CodeBottle currently supports only a limited number of programming languages, which may not meet the needs of developers working outside of these supported languages.
  • Subscription Costs
    While CodeBottle offers a free tier, some of its more advanced features require a paid subscription. This might be a barrier for individual developers or small teams with limited budgets.
  • Learning Curve
    New users might face a learning curve when getting started with the platform, especially if they are unfamiliar with the specific tools and features offered by CodeBottle.
  • Performance Issues
    Some users have reported performance issues such as slow loading times or occasional lags, which can hinder the overall user experience and productivity.
  • Crash Reporting
    Crashes and ANRs with symbolicated stacktraces, grouping and version impact
  • Session Replay
    Session Timeline replays every user action, screen, network call, log and system metric
  • Performance Monitoring
    Traces, app launch times, network latency and app health metrics per release
  • Bug Reporting
    Shake the device to file a bug, attached to the full session that led to it
  • Network Monitoring
    Request latency, status codes and failing endpoints, tied to the session
  • User Journeys
    See how users move between screens and where they drop off
  • AI Debugging
    Measure Agent plus an MCP server so coding agents can read production sessions
  • Adaptive Capture
    Dial data collection up or down remotely, without shipping a new release

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

CodeBottle 0 videos + Add
Measure.sh 1 video + Add

No CodeBottle videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Measure.sh: open source crash and performance monitoring for mobile apps (demo)

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
CodeBottle
Measure.sh
100% 100%
Productivity
0% 0%
0% 0%
User Monitoring
100% 100%
100% 100%
Developer Tools
0% 0%
0% 0%
Mobile Analytics
100% 100%

Questions & Answers

As answered by people managing CodeBottle and Measure.sh.

Who are some of the biggest customers of your product?

Measure.sh's answer:

Porsche, Astro, Hoichoi

What's the story behind your product?

Measure.sh's answer:

Measure grew out of a problem its founders kept running into. Between them they had led mobile engineering at companies including Gojek, Rapido and Groww, including the years when Gojek's app scaled from around 10,000 to 35 million daily active users. At each company they ended up building similar internal tooling to answer the same question: why is the app slow, frozen or broken for a real user in production when crash reporting shows nothing wrong? After rebuilding versions of the same tool more than once, they decided to apply the DRY principle to the problem itself and turn it into a product instead of another internal project. Measure was released publicly in September 2024 and is developed in the open under the Apache 2.0 license, with the roadmap and issues visible on GitHub.

How would you describe the primary audience of your product?

Measure.sh's answer:

Mobile engineering teams running consumer apps in production, especially at high growth companies where app quality has a direct effect on revenue and retention. Typical users are Android and iOS engineers, mobile platform and foundation teams, mobile leads and engineering managers who are accountable for crash free rates, ANRs, startup time and release health, along with the CTOs and VPs of Engineering who own those outcomes. Because Measure is open source and can be self hosted, it also fits teams with strict data residency or privacy requirements, and smaller teams looking for an open alternative to Firebase Crashlytics.

What makes your product unique?

Measure.sh's answer:

Measure.sh is an open source observability platform built specifically for mobile apps, rather than a mobile SDK attached to a backend monitoring product. Its defining capability is the session timeline, which reconstructs a complete user session including interactions, navigations, network calls, logs, lifecycle events and CPU and memory signals. This allows teams to diagnose problems that never produce a crash, such as ANRs, UI freezes, slow API chains and edge case state bugs. Measure also provides Adaptive Capture, which lets teams change what data is collected remotely without shipping an app update, and an MCP server that exposes crashes, traces and sessions to coding agents. It is available as a managed cloud service or fully self hosted, and is licensed under Apache 2.0.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

Measure.sh's answer:

  • Mobile first by design. Measure is built by mobile engineers for mobile teams, not adapted from a web or backend APM tool.
  • Full session context. Session replays and timelines show the user actions, navigations, network calls and logs that led to an issue, not just a stack trace.
  • Coverage beyond crashes. Crashes, ANRs, performance traces, network performance, bug reports, user journeys and app health metrics live in a single dashboard.
  • Open source and self hostable. Apache 2.0 licensed, so teams can keep all app and user data inside their own infrastructure.
  • Cost control. Per GB pricing combined with Adaptive Capture, which lets teams increase data collection during a risky release and reduce it afterwards without shipping an app update.
  • Broad platform support. Android, iOS, Flutter, React Native and Kotlin Multiplatform.
  • Agent ready. An MCP server exposes errors, traces and session data to coding agents and Slack for natural language debugging.

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

Measure.sh's answer:

  • Backend services: Go
  • Dashboard: TypeScript, React and Next.js
  • Data stores: ClickHouse for events, sessions and traces, PostgreSQL for application data
  • Streaming and caching: Apache Iggy and Valkey
  • Object storage: S3 compatible storage, with MinIO used in self hosted deployments
  • Symbolication: Symbolicator for native and mobile stack traces
  • SDKs: Kotlin for Android, Swift for iOS, Dart for Flutter, and TypeScript for React Native, plus Kotlin Multiplatform support
  • Deployment: Docker and Docker Compose for self hosting
  • License: Apache 2.0, with the full source available on GitHub at github.com/measure-sh/measure

User comments

Share your experience with using CodeBottle and Measure.sh. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

CodeBottle 1 mention
Measure.sh 0 mentions

Tracking Measure.sh since Sep 2026.

Alternatives to CodeBottle and Measure.sh

When comparing CodeBottle and Measure.sh, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...