
codebunk
coderpad
Floobits
Koding
Codeanywhere
AWS Cloud9
collabedit
A better way to conduct remote interviews. Collaborative code editor + video conferencing + code execution = Awesome interviews.

HackerRank
coderpad
Coderbyte
Codility
CodeSignal
DevSkiller
See how engineers actually work. Live or async technical interviews, in your repo, right in the browser.

Which is more popular?
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | codassium.com | kendor.io |
| Pricing | — | |
| Platforms | — | |
| Company | — | 2026 |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


No description of Codassium yet.
Kendor is a technical hiring platform for running live coding interviews and take-home assessments in a real development environment instead of a puzzle editor. Each candidate gets an isolated cloud sandbox in the browser with a VS Code editor, a terminal, running services and a live preview....
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing Codassium and Kendor.
Kendor's answer:
Kendor runs technical interviews in a real development environment, not a puzzle editor. Candidates work in a full VS Code editor in the browser, backed by a secure cloud sandbox that runs their code. That can be your own repository, with real services, a live preview and databases like PostgreSQL and Valkey. They can use AI coding agents such as Claude Code and Codex when you allow it, and reviewers see exactly how the AI was used. Live interviews happen in the same environment, with a built-in video call. You see how someone actually works, not how well they memorised algorithm puzzles.
Kendor's answer:
Most assessment tools still test isolated puzzles in a simple editor, and treat AI as cheating. Kendor reflects how engineers work today:
Kendor's answer:
Engineering-led hiring teams at startups and growing tech companies: CTOs, engineering managers and the recruiters who work with them. They want to see how a candidate really builds software, including with AI tools, rather than how they score on algorithm puzzles. Kendor suits teams hiring a few engineers at a time as well as companies running technical screens at volume.
Kendor's answer:
TypeScript throughout:
Kendor's answer:
I started building it when I was hiring engineers and found no good solution in the market. Most at the time focus on Leetcode like puzzle-tests and I didn't think they were realistic skill assessment for the job. So for the first couple of hires, we were just sending candidates repos with READMEs as take home assessment with manual timer. But the problem with that is we have no insights to how they work or what's their thinking process was while implementing it(Now with Agentic coding, it's even harder). And everything was manual including reviewing process so it wasted a lot of time. So I built Kendor to make my own hiring process easier and my colleagues liked it as well so they started using it for hiring as well.
Share your experience with using Codassium and Kendor. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
When comparing Codassium and Kendor, you can also consider the following products.

Realtime Collaborative Editor with Code Execution, REPLs and Chat
Compare codebunk to Codassium or Kendor:

HackerRank is a platform that allows companies to conduct interviews remotely to hire developers and for technical assessment purposes.
Compare HackerRank to Codassium or Kendor:

Collaborative code editor with in-browser, real-time execution. Conduct programming phone screens like a boss.
Compare coderpad to Codassium or Kendor:

Floobits brings real-time collaborative editing to text editors, IDEs, and now Atom.
Compare Floobits to Codassium or Kendor:

Coderbyte is a place built for anyone to practice and perfect their programming skills.
Compare Coderbyte to Codassium or Kendor:
