Codacy VS Finicky
Compare Codacy VS Finicky and see what are their differences
Connect your tools into a living knowledge graph. Sugarbug captures every signal to deliver compounding insights and unified context.
sponsored
Codacy
SonarQube
CodeClimate
CodeFactor.io
ESLint
Coveralls
SensioLabs Insight
codebeat
Finicky
Choosy
Browser Tamer
Hurl - Choose a Browser
Junction
Browser Select
LinkSheet
Switchbar
Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request reporting back the impact of every commit or pull request, issues concerning code style, best practices, security, and many others. It monitors changes in code coverage, code duplication and code complexity. Saving developers time in code reviews thus efficiently tackling technical debt. JavaScript, Java, Ruby, Scala, PHP, Python, CoffeeScript and CSS are currently supported. Codacy is static analysis without the hassle.
Codacy FinickyBased on our record, Finicky should be more popular than Codacy. It has been mentiond 25 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
I'm trying to use Codacy to review my code. One of the issues is regarding the use of the "setcookie" function. Source: over 4 years ago
Does anyone have an example on how to get this conversion done on github actions where I can convert the *.coverage file into a *.xml file for uploading to codacy.com. Source: about 5 years ago
Online analysisFinally, if you want a simple way to analyze your code without having to manually configure everything locally, you can use an online code review service such as Codacy (shameless plug here). We already integrate some of the mentioned detection tools in this article and we are working every day to improve the service. The other main benefit of using automated code review tools is to allow you to... - Source: dev.to / over 5 years ago
Because you care and because you always want to be better, automation is a great way to optimize your review workflow process. Go ahead and do a quick search on Google for automated code reviews and see who better fits your workflow. You'll find Codacy on your Google search and we hope you like what we do. - Source: dev.to / over 5 years ago
There is an open source web browser proxy thing called finicky [0]. I use at work that lets me redirect urls clicked in other apps like slack to specific browers (firefox / chrome) or even specific chrome profiles. It'll also allow you to rewrite the urls. [0] https://github.com/johnste/finicky. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
On Mac I used Finicky. I switched to Linux with Omarchy almost a year ago and went looking for an equivalent. Junction only asks every time, mimi doesn't carry routing rules. The remaining path was "build your own", and I did. It worked well, with a TUI that paired nicely with Omarchy. Then I thought: this should be a built-in feature on every OS, the same way each OS has a rule for which app opens PDFs. So I... - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
On Mac I used Finicky for this. For anyone who never saw it: it lets you write rules that decide which browser opens each link. You set Finicky as the system's default browser, and it applies your rules to every link clicked in any app, picking the right one. Rules are short scripts in JavaScript, simple or as elaborate as you need. It can even rewrite the URL before opening it: force HTTPS, strip tracking... - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
In addition to making the link look shady, it adds considerable lag to opening the link. I'm using Finicky[1] on Mac to rewrite the URL by extracting the original URL from the query params[2]. 1: https://github.com/johnste/finicky 2: https://github.com/fphilipe/dotfiles/blob/31e3d18fe5f51b2fd86cb7f1762453c1c4779ef9/finicky.js#L4-L8. - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
Just curious, did you explore finicky(https://github.com/johnste/finicky)? - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
SonarQube - SonarQube, a core component of the Sonar solution, is an open source, self-managed tool that systematically helps developers and organizations deliver Clean Code.
Choosy - Choosy opens links in different browsers as specified, according to rules, set by the user.
CodeClimate - Code Climate provides automated code review for your apps, letting you fix quality and security issues before they hit production. We check every commit, branch and pull request for changes in quality and potential vulnerabilities.
Browser Tamer - Makes correct URLs open in browsers you want instead of the system defaults.
CodeFactor.io - Automated Code Review for GitHub & BitBucket
Hurl - Choose a Browser - A windows utility that lets you choose the browser on the click of a link